Journals / Gıda / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTIES OF PROBIOTIC FERMENTED DAIRY PRODUCTS MADE BY USING COW AND GOAT MILK

İNEK VE KEÇİ SÜTÜ KULLANILARAK ÜRETİLEN PROBİYOTİK FERMENTE SÜT ÜRÜNLERİNİN KARAKTERİSTİK ÖZELLİKLERİ

Journal
Gıda
Pages
315–328
Publication Date
2020-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Volatile components of butyric acid, acetic acid, acetoin, diacetyl, d-limonene, hexanoic acid and 2-nonanone were determined in all probiotic fermented products.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, determination of physicochemical and sensory properties of fermentation of cow and goat milk by using L.acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and S.thermophilus mixed culture (ABT), Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (BB) and L.acidophilus (LA) cultures during 30 day storage at 4°C was aimed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lactoferrin levels were higher in milk samples than probiotic fermented products.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Volatile components of butyric acid, acetic acid, acetoin, diacetyl, d-limonene, hexanoic acid and 2-nonanone were determined in all probiotic fermented products.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Probiyotik · Laktoferrin · angiotensin I-dönüştürücü enzim

Abstract

In this study, determination of physicochemical and sensory properties of fermentation of cow and goat milk by using L.acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and S.thermophilus mixed culture (ABT), Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (BB) and L.acidophilus (LA) cultures during 30 day storage at 4°C was aimed. Lactoferrin levels were higher in milk samples than probiotic fermented products. The results of ACE inhibitory activity measurement were found to be lower in probiotic fermented products produced with goat milk than those produced with cow's milk. Cooked, creamy, fermented, milky, bland, sour, sweet, salty and astringent were the sensory descriptors detected in all products. However, animal-like odor was found only in the products produced with goat milk. Volatile components of butyric acid, acetic acid, acetoin, diacetyl, d-limonene, hexanoic acid and 2-nonanone were determined in all probiotic fermented products.

Özet

Çalışmada, inek ve keçi sütünün L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis ve S.thermophilus karışık kültürü (ABT), Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (BB) ve L.acidophilus (LA) kültürleriyle fermente edilmesiyle elde edilen probiyotik süt ürünlerinin 4°C’de 30 gün depolanması süresince fizikokimyasal ve duyusal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Laktoferrin değerinin süt örneklerinde probiyotik fermente ürünlere göre daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. ACE inhibitör aktivitesi ölçümü sonuçlarının, keçi sütü ile üretilen probiyotik fermente ürünlerde inek sütü ile üretilenlere göre daha düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Pişmiş, kremamsı, fermente, sütümsü, yavan, ekşi, tatlı, tuzlu ve buruk tüm ürünlerde tespit edilen duyusal tanımlayıcılardır. Ancak hayvansı koku yalnızca keçi sütü ile üretilen ürünlerde tespit edilmiştir. Tüm probiyotik fermente ürünlerde bütirik asit, asetik asit, asetoin, diasetil, d-limonen, hekzanoik asit ve 2-nonanon uçucu bileşenleri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NALBANT, D., YÜCEER, Y. (2020). CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTIES OF PROBIOTIC FERMENTED DAIRY PRODUCTS MADE BY USING COW AND GOAT MILK. Gıda, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 315–328. https://ajindex.com/articles/39018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alkan E., 2008. Laktoferrin ve Gıdalarda Kullanımı. Gıda ve Yem Bilimi Teknolojisi, 10 (5): 31-38.
  2. Atamer M., Sezgin E., 1986. Yoğurtlarda Kurumadde Artırımının Pıhtının Fiziksel Özelliklerine Etkisi, Gıda Dergisi, 11: 327-331.
  3. Avcı G., Sel T., 2004. Laktasyon Periyodundaki Ankara Keçilerinde Süt ve Serum. Ankara Üniversitesi Veterinerlik Fakakültesi Dergisi, 51: 181-187.
  4. Avşar Y.K., Karagul Yuceer Y., Drake M.A., Singh T.K., Yoon Y., Cadwallader K.R., 2004. Characterization of Nutty Flavor in Cheddar Cheese. Journal of Dairy Science, 87: 1999-2010.
  5. Başpınar E., Mendeş M., Çamdeviren H., 2000. Multidimensional Scaling Analysis and Its Usage. Biyoteknoloji (KUKEM), 24: 89-98.
  6. Bradley Jr.R.L., Arnold Jr.E., Barbano D.M., Semerad R.G., Smith D.E., Vines B.K., 1992. Chemical and Physical Methods. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, Ed: Marshall, R.T., American Public Health Association, Washington D.C., 433-531.
  7. Chen P.W., Mao F.C., 2004. Detection of Lactoferrin in Bovine and Goat Milk by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 12 (2): 133-139.
  8. Danowski K., Gross J. J., Meyer H. H. and Kliem H., 2012. Effects of Induced Energy Deficiency on Lactoferrin Concentration in Milk and the Lactoferrin Reaction of Primary Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells in Vitro. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 97: 647–655.
  9. Dave R., Shah N., 1996. Evaluation of Media for Selective Enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacteria. Journal of Dairy Science, 79: 1529-1536.
  10. Dupont D., Arnould C., Rolet-Repecaud O., Duboz G., Faurie F., Martin B., Beuvier E., 2006. Determination of Bovine Lactoferrin Concentrations in Cheese with Specific Monoclonal Antibodies. International Dairy Journal, 16: 1081-1087.
  11. Erdmann K., Cheung B.W.Y., Schröder H., 2008. The Possible Roles of Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides in Reducing the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 19: 643-654.
  12. Gonzalez-Gonzalez C., Gibson T., Jauregi P., 2013. Novel Probiotic-Fermented Milk with Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides Produced By Bifidobacterium Bifidum MF 20/5. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 167: 131-137.
  13. İşleten M., Karagül-Yüceer Y., 2006. Effects of Dried Dairy Ingredients on Pyhsical and Sensory Properties of Nonfat Yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 2865-2872.
  14. Kailasapathy K., Harmstorf I., Phillips