Journals / Gıda / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF BILECIK HONEYS IN TERMS OF MELISSOPALYNOLOGY AND CHEMICAL ANALYSES

BİLECİK BALLARININ MELİSSOPALİNOLOJİK VE KİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİ AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Journal
Gıda
Pages
275–289
Publication Date
2020-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

GC-MS analysis showed that honey samples were rich in volatile components.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The composition of honey varies depending on many factors such as flora, climatic characteristics, collection time and stile.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, melissopalinological, moisture, total phenolic content, glucose and fructose ratio were measured in 16 honey samples collected from Bilecik province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:GC-MS analysis showed that honey samples were rich in volatile components.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bal · melissopalinolojik analiz · toplam polifenol

Abstract

The composition of honey varies depending on many factors such as flora, climatic characteristics, collection time and stile. In determining the quality of honey, its chemical origin and antioxidant properties should be investigated. In this study, melissopalinological, moisture, total phenolic content, glucose and fructose ratio were measured in 16 honey samples collected from Bilecik province. Accordingly, 35 different plant taxa belonging to 20 families were found. When total pollen counts were evaluated, six honeys were found to be normal quality whereas ten honeys were considered to be low quality. The moisture content of honeys varied between 15.8% and 19.5%. Fructose/glycose ratio of honeys was found to be between 0.96 and 1.19. Total phenolic content of honey sample was determined as the lowest value of 33 mg GAE/ 100 g and the highest value of 81 mg GAE/ 100 g. GC-MS analysis showed that honey samples were rich in volatile components.

Özet

Balın içeriği toplandığı bölgenin florası, iklimsel özellikleri, toplanma zamanı ve şekli gibi birçok etkene göre farklılık gösterebilmektedir. Balın kalitesinin belirlenmesinde başta bitkisel orijini olmak üzere kimyasal ve antioksidan özelliklerinin de ortaya konulması gerekmektedir. Yapılan bu çalışmada Bilecik ilinden toplanan 16 adet bal örneği melissopalinolojik açıdan incelenmiş, balların nem, toplam fenolik madde miktarı, glukoz, fruktoz oranları ve aroma bileşenleri belirlenmiştir Elde edilen bulgular sonucu ballarda 20 familyaya ait 35 farklı bitki taksonuna rastlanmıştır. Toplam polen sayıları açısından değerlendirildiğinde 6 adet balın normal, 10 adet balın ise düşük kalitede oldukları görülmüştür. Balların nem içerikleri %15.8 ile %19.5 arasında değişmektedir. Balların fruktoz/glikoz (F/G) oranlarının ise 096 ile 1.19 aralığında olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ballarda toplam fenolik madde miktarı en düşük 33 mg GAE/ 100 g iken en yüksek 81 mg GAE/ 100 g olarak ölçülmüştür. GC-MS analizleri sonucu balların aldehitler, alifatik asit ve esterleri, alkoller, ketonlar, terpenler ve yağ asitleri gibi bileşik gruplarını içerdikleri gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, Ş., MAYDA, N., KESKİN, M., ÖZKÖK, A. (2020). INVESTIGATION OF BILECIK HONEYS IN TERMS OF MELISSOPALYNOLOGY AND CHEMICAL ANALYSES. Gıda, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 275–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/39015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anonymous (2012),
  2. Türk Gıda Kodeksi. Bal Tebligi (2012). Teblig no: 2012/58. Resmi Gazete, 28366. Alimentarius, C. (1998). Draft revised for honey at step 6 of the Codex Procedure. CX 5/10.2. CL 1998/12-S. Barcarolo, R., Centeleghe, M., Zanatta, P., Conte, L. S. (1998). GC-MS coupled with head space sampling with reverse carrier flow in sampling step applied to honey characterization. In 5th international symposium of hyphenated technique in chromatography, Bruges, Belgium (pp. 11-21).
  3. Bertoncelj, J., Doberšek, U., Jamnik, M., Golob, T. (2007). Evaluation of the phenolic content, antioxidant activity and colour of Slovenian honey. Food Chem., 105, 822-828.Bogdanov, S. (1997). Charakterisierung von Schweizer Sortenhonigen. Agrarforschung, 4, 427-430.
  4. Bogdanov, S., Martin, P., Lullmann, C. (2002). Harmonised methods of the international honey commission. Swiss Bee Research Centre, FAM, Liebefeld. Cuevas-Glory, L. F., Pino, J. A., Santiago, L. S., Sauri-Duch, E. (2007). A review of volatile analytical methods for determining the botanical origin of honey. Food Chem, 103(3), 1032-1043.
  5. Cianciosi D., Forbes-Hernández T.Y., Afrin S., Gasparrini M., Reboredo-Rodriguez P., Manna P.P., Zhang J., Lamas L.B., Martínez Flórez S., Toyos P.A., Quiles, J.L., Giampieri F., Maurizio Battino,M. (2018). Phenolic Compounds in Honey and Their Associated Health Benefits: A Review. Molecules, 23, 2322. Çelemli, Ö. G., Özenirler, Ç., Ecem Bayram, N., Zare, G., Sorkun, K. (2018). Melissopalynological Analysis for Geographical Marking of Kars Honey, Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 24(1), 53-59.
  6. Devillers, J., Morlot, M., Pham-Delegue, M. H., Dore, J. C. (2004). Classification of monofloral honeys based on their quality control data. Food Chem, 86(2), 305-312.7. Feller-Demalsy, M. J., Parent, J., Strachan, A. A. (1989). Microscopic analysis of honeys from Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Apicultural Research, 28(1), 41-49.
  7. Gül A., Pehlivan, T. (2018). Antioxidant activities of some monofloral honey types produced across Turkey. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 25, 1056–1065.
  8. Hasan, S. H. (2013). Effect of storage and processing temperatures on honey quality. JUBPAS, 6(21), 2244-2253.
  9. Karadal, F., Yıldırım, Y. (2012). Balın kalite nitelikleri, beslenme ve sağlık açısından önemi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 197-209.
  10. Kolaylı, S., Aliyazıcıoğlu, R., Ulusoy, E., Karaoğlu, Ş. (2008). antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of selected turkish honeys. Hacettepe J.