Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship between Environmental Quality, Globalization and Institutions: An Analysis for G-20 Countries Case

Çevresel Kalite, Küreselleşme ve Kurumlar Arasındaki İlişki: G-20 Ülkeleri İçin Bir Analiz

Pages
238–251
Publication Date
2022-03-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, in the long term, it is determined that while there is a causal relationship between environmental quality and globalization, there is no causality relationship between environmental quality and institutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Globalization is an important factor that creates socio-economic and political effects for both developed countries and developing, underdeveloped countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Economic mobility which increased with disappearance of the borders between countries, ensured increasing in global production level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, in the long term, it is determined that while there is a causal relationship between environmental quality and globalization, there is no causality relationship between environmental quality and institutions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Küreselleşme · çevresel kalite · kurumsal kalite

Abstract

Globalization is an important factor that creates socio-economic and political effects for both developed countries and developing, underdeveloped countries. Economic mobility which increased with disappearance of the borders between countries, ensured increasing in global production level. However, it also caused negative consequences in terms of sustainability of natural resources and environmental factors. This has increased the interest of countries in socio-economic policies that consider the sustainability and environmental quality. In this context, this paper aims to examine the dynamic relationship between environmental quality, globalization and institutions for G-20 countries. The study examines validity and direction of the relationship between environmental quality, globalization, institutions, renewable energy and economic growth for these 19 countries covering the period of 1990-2018 by using panel causality and panel cointegration methods. According to the results of the study, in the long term, it is determined that while there is a causal relationship between environmental quality and globalization, there is no causality relationship between environmental quality and institutions. On the other hand, the extent of the relationship of variables differs across countries.

Özet

Küreselleşme, hem gelişmiş ülkeler, hem de gelişmekte olan ve az gelişmiş ülkeler için önemli sosyo-ekonomik ve politik etkiler yaratan bir unsurdur. Ülkeler arasındaki sınırların kalkmasıyla birlikte artan ekonomik hareketlilik üretim artışını beraberinde getirmekle birlikte, doğal kaynakların sürdürülebilirliği ve çevresel unsurlar açısından olumsuz sonuçların oluşabilmesine neden olmaktadır. Bu durum, ülkelerin sürdürülebilirliği ve çevresel kaliteyi dikkate alan ekonomik politikalara olan ilgisini artırmıştır. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada G-20 ülkeleri için çevresel kalite, küreselleşme ve kurumlar arasındaki dinamik ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. 1990-2018 dönemini kapsayan çalışmada panel nedensellik ve panel eşbütünleşme yöntemi kullanılarak çalışmaya konu olan 19 ülke için çevresel kalite, küreselleşme, kurumlar, yenilenebilir enerji ve ekonomik büyüme değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkinin geçerliliği ve yönü incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, uzun dönemde çevresel kalite ve küreselleşme arasında nedensellik ilişkisi varken, çevresel kalite ve kurumlar arasında bir nedensellik ilişkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, ülkeler bazında değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin boyutu farklılaşmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHTİYAR, B., YAĞLIKARA, A. (2022). The Relationship between Environmental Quality, Globalization and Institutions: An Analysis for G-20 Countries Case. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 238–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/389920

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ahad, M., ve Khan, W. (2016). Does globalization impede environmental quality in Bangladesh? The role of real economic activities and energy use. Bulletin of Energy Economics, 4(3), 258-279.
  2. Ali, H. S., Zeqiraj, V., Lin, W. L., Law, S. H., Yusop, Z., Bare, U. A. A., ve Chin, L. (2019). Does quality institutions promote environmental quality?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(11), 10446-10456.
  3. Amuakwa-Mensah, F., ve Adom, P. K. (2017). Quality of institution and the FEG (forest, energy intensity, and globalization)-environment relationships in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(21), 17455-17473.
  4. Baliamoune-Lutz, M. (2017). Trade and environmental quality in African countries: Do institutions matter?. Eastern Economic Journal, 43(1), 155-172.
  5. Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., ve Khan, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 176-184.
  6. Bayar, Y., ve Sasmaz, M. U. (2017). Impact of foreign direct investments on unemployment in emerging market economies: A co-integration analysis. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), 10(3), 90-96.
  7. BP (2020). BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2020.
  8. Breitung, J. (2005). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econometric Reviews, 24(2), 151-173.
  9. Breusch, T. S., ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  10. Dasgupta, S., ve De Cian, E. (2016). Institutions and the environment: existing evidence and future directions. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
  11. Dumitrescu, E. I., ve Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  12. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., ve Sturm, J. E. (2018). The KOF globalisation index-revisited, 14(3), 543-574.
  13. Haseeb, A., Xia, E., Baloch, M. A., ve Abbas, K. (2018). Financial development, globalization, and CO 2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(31), 31283-31296.
  14. Hosseini, H. M., ve Kaneko, S. (2013). Can environmental quality spread through institutions?. Ener