Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 37

TRACES OF OLD CODES IN NEW MEDIA: ANALYSIS OF THE TWITTER USE OF CANDIDATES IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AT 2018

YENİ MEDYADA ESKİ KODLARIN İZLERİ: 24 HAZİRAN 2018 CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI SEÇİMLERİNDE SİYASİ AKTÖRLERİN TWITTER KULLANIMININ ANALİZİ

Pages
232–265
Publication Date
2021-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the data collected through content analysis technique, it was determined that political actors used social media in one way and used the new technology within the framework of the old political communication strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social media, which has become an effective tool for political parties or political actors to convey their views and opinions to their followers and citizens independently of time and place, is referred to the transformational effect of political communication campaigns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aims to analysis the ways in which presidential candidates use Twitter in political communication campaigns in the Presidential and General Elections of June 24, 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the data collected through content analysis technique, it was determined that political actors used social media in one way and used the new technology within the framework of the old political communication strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Medya · İçerik Analizi · Twitter

Abstract

Social media, which has become an effective tool for political parties or political actors to convey their views and opinions to their followers and citizens independently of time and place, is referred to the transformational effect of political communication campaigns. Considering the fact that both voters and political actors do not achieve equal access to mainstream media tools, social media tools offer important opportunities for voters to interact with political actors and to explain their ideas to political actors. The study aims to analysis the ways in which presidential candidates use Twitter in political communication campaigns in the Presidential and General Elections of June 24, 2018. During the election campaign, the role of political actors in creating online campaigns, how and how they use Twitter, what they intend to use Twitter, what issues they keep on the agenda during the election campaign, and the level of their interaction with the electorate are presented. As a result of the data collected through content analysis technique, it was determined that political actors used social media in one way and used the new technology within the framework of the old political communication strategies.

Özet

Siyasi partilerin ya da siyasi aktörlerin zaman ve mekândan bağımsız olarak kendi görüş ve düşüncelerini takipçilerine, yurttaşlara iletmesinde etkin bir araç haline gelen sosyal medyanın siyasal iletişim kampanyalarını dönüştürücü etkisinden söz edilmektedir. Özellikle ana akım medya araçlarına hem seçmenlerin hem de siyasi aktörlerin eşit bir şekilde ulaşamayacağı hallerde, sosyal medya araçları seçmenlere siyasal aktörlerle etkileşime geçebilme, onlara fikirlerini açıklamada önemli olanaklar sunmaktadır. Çalışma, 24 Haziran 2018 Cumhurbaşkanlığı ve Genel Seçimleri’nde Cumhurbaşkanı adaylarının siyasal iletişim kampanyalarında Twitter’ı kullanma biçimlerini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, seçim kampanyası sırasında siyasi aktörlerin çevrimiçi (online) kampanya oluşturma stilleri ve seçim kampanyası boyunca hangi konuları gündemde tuttukları ve seçmenle olan etkileşimlerinin düzeyi ortaya konulmaktadır. İçerik analizi tekniğiyle toplanan veriler üzerinden yapılan değerlendirme sonucunda siyasi aktörlerin çift yönlü iletişime ve etkileşime olanak sağlayan sosyal medyayı, tek yönlü olarak ve yeni olan bu teknolojiyi eski siyasal iletişim stratejileri çerçevesinde kullandıkları tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURT, E. V., NEĞİŞ, H. M. (2021). TRACES OF OLD CODES IN NEW MEDIA: ANALYSIS OF THE TWITTER USE OF CANDIDATES IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AT 2018. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 37, 232–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/388577

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Avrupa Birliği, https://ab.org.tr/ab12/bildiri/205.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05.03.2019
  2. Aziz, A. (2015).
  3. Siyasal İletişim, Ankara:
  4. Nobel Yayınları.
  5. Bayraktutan, G., Binark, M., Çomu, T., Doğu, B., İslamoğlu, G. ve Telli Aydemir, A.(2012). “Sosyal Medyada 2011 Genel Seçimleri: Nicel – Nitel Arayüzey İncelemesi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi, İletişim Dergisi, 7, 3, 5-29.
  6. Blumler, J.G. ve Kavanagh, D. (1999). “The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features”, Political Communication, 16,3, 209 – 230. Broersma, M. Ve Graham, T. (2012). “Social Media as Beat”, Journalism Practice, 6, (3), 403-419.
  7. Bruns, A. ve Highfield, T. (2016). “May the best tweeter win: The Twitter strategies of key campaign accounts in the 2012 US election”. (Editörler) Bieber, Christoph, & Kamps, Klaus, Die US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2012. Wiesbaden: Springer, 425–442.
  8. Bouza, F.(2004). “The Impact Area of Political Communication: Citizanship Faced with Public Discourse”. International Review of Sociology, 14:2, 245 – 259. Chang, V. (2009). “Obama and the Power of Social Media and Technology”, Stanford Graduate School of Business, http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/cases/documents/M321.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 20.02.2019.
  9. Cohen, B. (1969).
  10. The Press and Foreign Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  11. Cogburn, D. L., Espinoza, V. ve Fatima K. (2011). “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation”. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2), 189-213.
  12. Conover, M.D., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A. ve Menczer, F. (2012). “Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity”, EPJ Data Science, 1:6, 1-19.
  13. Digrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J. ve Rojas, F. (2013). “More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior”, 8-11.
  14. Doğu, B., Özçetin, B., Bayraktutan, G., Binark, M., Çomu, T., Telli Aydemir, A. ve İslamoğlu, G. (2014). Siyasetin Yeni Hali Vaka-i Sosyal Medya, İstanbul:
  15. Kalkedon Yayınları.
  16. Effing, R., Hillegersberg, J.V. ve Huibers, T. (2011). “Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems?”, (Editörler) E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, and H. de Bruijn: ePart, LNCS 6847, 25–35.
  17. Enli, G. ve Naper, A. (2016). “Social media incumbent advantage: Barack Obama’s and Mitt Romney’s Tweets in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign” (Editörler), Bruns, A, Enli, G, Skogerbø, E, v.d., The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, New York: Routledge, 364–377.
  18. Enli, G. (2017). “Twitter as arena for the