Journals / Teknik Dergi / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 6

Evaluation of Load-Transfer Efficiency of Steel Mesh Reinforced Contraction Joints in Concrete Pavement: Accelerated Pavement Test and FE Analysis

Pages
11337–11359
Publication Date
2021-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that the load transfer efficiency was found to be a complex parameter and should be interpreted together with average displacement values when contraction joints are evaluated at early traffic loadings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Transverse contraction joints are by far the most common type of joint in jointed plain concrete pavements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, load transfer efficiency (LTE) of steel mesh reinforced transverse contraction joints were studied at accelerated pavement tests (APT). 3D finite element (FE) model of jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) was developed to study deflections and crack propagation in just under the joint of the concrete pavement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that the load transfer efficiency was found to be a complex parameter and should be interpreted together with average displacement values when contraction joints are evaluated at early traffic loadings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Accelerated pavement test · finite element analysis · concrete pavement

Abstract

Transverse contraction joints are by far the most common type of joint in jointed plain concrete pavements. Early loading of contraction joints can create a weakened vertical plane and later grow as a full-depth crack. In this study, load transfer efficiency (LTE) of steel mesh reinforced transverse contraction joints were studied at accelerated pavement tests (APT). 3D finite element (FE) model of jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) was developed to study deflections and crack propagation in just under the joint of the concrete pavement. The APT tests were focused on the LTE values before and after the crack initiation under the contraction joint region. Experiments were performed on three slabs in which two of these slabs were prepared without reinforcement and one of them was reinforced with steel mesh. Data generated by APT was used for verification of crack propagation modeling in the finite element analysis. Steel mesh reinforced slab gave the lowest vertical deflections (51μm) and highest LTE (91.56%). The LTE value in the reinforced slab after 25,000 passes was 13.63% higher than the average of unreinforced slabs. The findings suggest that the load transfer efficiency was found to be a complex parameter and should be interpreted together with average displacement values when contraction joints are evaluated at early traffic loadings.

Özet

Transverse contraction joints are by far the most common type of joint in jointed plain concrete pavements. Early loading of contraction joints can create a weakened vertical plane and later grow as a full-depth crack. In this study, load transfer efficiency (LTE) of steel mesh reinforced transverse contraction joints were studied at accelerated pavement tests (APT). 3D finite element (FE) model of jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) was developed to study deflections and crack propagation in just under the joint of the concrete pavement. The APT tests were focused on the LTE values before and after the crack initiation under the contraction joint region. Experiments were performed on three slabs in which two of these slabs were prepared without reinforcement and one of them was reinforced with steel mesh. Data generated by APT was used for verification of crack propagation modeling in the finite element analysis. Steel mesh reinforced slab gave the lowest vertical deflections (51μm) and highest LTE (91.56%). The LTE value in the reinforced slab after 25,000 passes was 13.63% higher than the average of unreinforced slabs. The findings suggest that the load transfer efficiency was found to be a complex parameter and should be interpreted together with average displacement values when contraction joints are evaluated at early traffic loadings.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, M., SEFEROĞLU, M. T., AKPINAR, M. V., NASERY, M. M., SEFEROĞLU, A. G. (2021). Evaluation of Load-Transfer Efficiency of Steel Mesh Reinforced Contraction Joints in Concrete Pavement: Accelerated Pavement Test and FE Analysis. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 6, 11337–11359. https://ajindex.com/articles/386404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ACI (American Concrete Institute), Joints in Concrete Construction, ACI 224.3R-95, 2001.
  2. Springenschmid, R., Reimer, B., Fleischer, W., Construction of concrete pavements in West Germany. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1182, 12-17, 1988.
  3. Bautista, F. E., Basheer, I., Jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) preservation and rehabilitation design guide, California Department of Transportation (CDOT) Division of Design, 2008.
  4. Suprenant, A. B., Saw cutting joints in concrete, 1995. Available from: https://www.concreteconstruction.net/how-to/construction/sawcutting-joints-in-concrete_o [Accessed 1 January 1995]. ACI (American Concrete Institute), Guide for design and construction of new jointed plain concrete pavements (JPCPs), Report No. ACI 325.12R-02, 2002.
  5. Colley, B. E., Humphrey, H. M., Aggregate interlock at joints in concrete pavements. Bulletin HRB National Research Council, 189, 1-18, 1967.
  6. Bishoff, D., Toepel, A., Dowel bar retrofit-STH 13 Construction and one-year performance report, Report No. WI-07-02, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 2002.
  7. Hanekom, A. C., Horak, E., Visser, A.T., Comparison of South African and American aggregate interlock efficiency at concrete pavement joints. In: Proceedings of the 16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, University of Washington, Seattle, 2003. CDOT (California Department of Transportation), Guide for Design and Construction of New Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements (JPCPs), 2008.
  8. Darter, M., Barenberg, E., Yrjanson, W., Joint repair methods for Portland cement concrete pavements, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report No. 281, 1985. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), Pavement subsurface drainage, Technical Guide Paper 90-01, 1990.
  9. Bennert, T. A., A rational approach to the prediction of reflective cracking in bituminous overlays for concrete pavements, Thesis (PhD), The State University of New Jersey, 2009.
  10. Khazanovich, L., Rita, L., Tompkins, D., Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of concrete pavements using asphalt overlays, Report No: FHWA TPF-5 (149), University of Minnesota, 2012.
  11. Shoukry, S. N., William, W. G., Riad, M.Y., Evaluation of load transfer efficiency measurement, Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center, Report No: WVU-2002-04, 2005.
  12. Sadeghi, V., Hesami S., Investigation of load transfer efficiency in jointed plainconcrete pavements (JPCP) using FEM. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology,