Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2006 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

A Miocene Palaeovalley Network in the Western Taurus (Turkey)

Pages
1–23
Publication Date
2006-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Uplift of the Taurus chain followed in the Pliocene and Quaternary, and is responsible for the extensive karstic circulation seen today, which left aside remnants of the ancient morphology of the chain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lower Miocene conglomerates in the Köprü and Manavgat basins contain pebbles that can be confidently traced back to their source areas, owing to their distinctive lithologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These may be seen in the upper karstic areas of the chain, where a large part of a high surface (1500-2200 m) is preserved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Uplift of the Taurus chain followed in the Pliocene and Quaternary, and is responsible for the extensive karstic circulation seen today, which left aside remnants of the ancient morphology of the chain.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:fluviatile network · tracer pebbles · Miocene morphology

Abstract

Lower Miocene conglomerates in the Köprü and Manavgat basins contain pebbles that can be confidently traced back to their source areas, owing to their distinctive lithologies. Among others, are the green Huğlu volcanics (Late Trias), known only in allochthonous units from the Beyşehir region, or the Alanya blueschists, restricted to the Sugözü unit in the Alanya Massif. The problem is to find out how this detrital material could have travelled about eighty kilometres through the Taurus calcareous units during the Miocene. Fortunately, the present drainage system is not yet fully reorganised in the Taurus, and large areas of the chain still retain fossil morphologies. These may be seen in the upper karstic areas of the chain, where a large part of a high surface (1500-2200 m) is preserved. On this surface several dry valleys, some of them 400 m deep, with meanders and tributaries, have been recognised. They are disconnected from the present drainage, and represent fragments of a former network directed NE-SW, at right angles to the structures of the Taurus chain. The age of this network may be attributed indirectly to the Early Miocene. On the other hand, the presence of blueschist fragments in conglomerates of the Aksu Basin cannot be explained through a NE-SW-directed drainage system, and implies instead that the Alanya Massif extends to the west below the Miocene cover of the Antalya Gulf. Later, Late Miocene faulting fragmented the high surface and disrupted the drainage system. Uplift of the Taurus chain followed in the Pliocene and Quaternary, and is responsible for the extensive karstic circulation seen today, which left aside remnants of the ancient morphology of the chain.

Özet

Lower Miocene conglomerates in the Köprü and Manavgat basins contain pebbles that can be confidently traced back to their source areas, owing to their distinctive lithologies. Among others, are the green Huğlu volcanics (Late Trias), known only in allochthonous units from the Beyşehir region, or the Alanya blueschists, restricted to the Sugözü unit in the Alanya Massif. The problem is to find out how this detrital material could have travelled about eighty kilometres through the Taurus calcareous units during the Miocene. Fortunately, the present drainage system is not yet fully reorganised in the Taurus, and large areas of the chain still retain fossil morphologies. These may be seen in the upper karstic areas of the chain, where a large part of a high surface (1500-2200 m) is preserved. On this surface several dry valleys, some of them 400 m deep, with meanders and tributaries, have been recognised. They are disconnected from the present drainage, and represent fragments of a former network directed NE-SW, at right angles to the structures of the Taurus chain. The age of this network may be attributed indirectly to the Early Miocene. On the other hand, the presence of blueschist fragments in conglomerates of the Aksu Basin cannot be explained through a NE-SW-directed drainage system, and implies instead that the Alanya Massif extends to the west below the Miocene cover of the Antalya Gulf. Later, Late Miocene faulting fragmented the high surface and disrupted the drainage system. Uplift of the Taurus chain followed in the Pliocene and Quaternary, and is responsible for the extensive karstic circulation seen today, which left aside remnants of the ancient morphology of the chain.

🔖

Cite This Article

MONOD, O., OKAY, C. K. &. A. İ., OKAY, A. İ. (2006). A Miocene Palaeovalley Network in the Western Taurus (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 1–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/384823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AKAY, E., UYSAL, S., POISSON, A., CRAVATTE, J. & MÜLLER, C. 1985. Stratigraphy of the Antalya Neogene Basin. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey 28, 105–119.
  2. ANDREW, T. & ROBERTSON, A.H.F. 2002. The Beyflehir-Hoyran-Hadim nappes: genesis and emplacement of Mesozoic marginal and oceanic units of the Northern Neotethys in southern Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London 159, 529–543.
  3. ARPAT, E. & ÖZGÜL, N. 1972. Rock glaciers around Geyik Da¤, Central Taurides. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Bulletin 78, 28–32.
  4. BABINOT, J.-F. 2002. Ostracodes miocènes de séries annexes aux bassins de Köprüçay et de Manavgat, région d’Antalya (sud Turquie). Revue Paléobiologie, Genève 21, 735–757.
  5. BIROT, P. & DRESCH, J. 1956. La Méditerrannée et le Moyen Orient, t. 2, 526 p. BLUMENTHAL, M. 1951. Recherches géologiques dans le Taurus Occidental dans l’arrière-pays d’Alanya. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Publications D5, 134 p. ÇINER, A., DEYNOUX, M. & ÇÖREKÇ‹O⁄LU, E. 1999. Hummocky moraines in the Namaras and Susam Valleys, Central Taurides, SW Turkey. Quaternary Science Reviews 18, 659–669.
  6. DE BROEKERT, P. & SANDIFORD, M. 2005. Buried inset-valleys in the eastern Yilgarn Craton, western Australia: geomorphology, age, and allogenic control. The Journal of Geology 113, 471–493.
  7. DEYNOUX, M., ÇINER, A., MONOD, O., KARAB›Y›KO⁄LU, M., MANATSCHAL, G. & TUZCU, S. 2005. Facies architecture and depositional evolution of alluvial fan to fan-delta complexes in the tectonically active Miocene Köprüçay Basin, Isparta Angle, Turkey. Sedimentary Geology 173, 315–343.
  8. DUMONT, J.-F. & KEREY, E. 1975. K›rkkavak fay›: bat› Toroslar ile Köprüçay Baseni s›n›r›nda kuzey–güney du¤rultu at›ml› fay [K›rkkavak fault: A N–S-trending strike-slip fault at the contact between the western Taurides and Köprüçay Basin]. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey 18, 59–62 [in Turkish with English abstract]. EKMEKÇ‹, M. 2003. Review of Turkish karst with emphasis on tectonic and palaeogeographic controls. Acta Carsologica 32, 205–218. ER‹fl, K., BASSANT, P. & ÜLGEN, U. 2005. Tectono-stratigraphic evolution of an Early Miocene incised valley-fill in the Mut Basin, southern Turkey. Sedimentary Geology 173, 151–185.
  9. FLECKER, R., ROBERTSON, A.H.F., POISSON, A. & MÜLLER, C. 1995. Facies and tectonic significance of two contrasting Miocene basins in south coastal Turkey. Terra Nova 7, 221–232.
  10. FORD, D.C. & WILLIAMS, P.W. 1989. Karst Geomorp