Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Earthquake Hazard of the Aegean Extension Region (West Turkey)

Pages
593–614
Publication Date
2008-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the Frequency-Magnitude Distribution (FMD), seismic activity rates (b- and z-values) and fractal correlation dimension, we detected three anomalous zones throughout the Aegean Extension Region (AER).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:West Turkey, one of the most seismically active regions of Turkey, has been analysed to reveal seismic hazard by using fractal behaviour, seismic quiescence z- and Gutenberg-Richter b-parameters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results obtained from the Frequency-Magnitude Distribution (FMD), seismic activity rates (b- and z-values) and fractal correlation dimension, we detected three anomalous zones throughout the Aegean Extension Region (AER).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, it is also possible to say that large earthquakes are generally not expected in those related zones because of seismic moment release from small-moderate sized earthquakes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:West Turkey · earthquake catalogue · fractal analysis

Abstract

West Turkey, one of the most seismically active regions of Turkey, has been analysed to reveal seismic hazard by using fractal behaviour, seismic quiescence z- and Gutenberg-Richter b-parameters. Starting from raw earthquake catalogue, we performed completeness analysis on recorded events, and a final catalogue, could be accepted as homogeneous, was obtained. According to the results obtained from the Frequency-Magnitude Distribution (FMD), seismic activity rates (b- and z-values) and fractal correlation dimension, we detected three anomalous zones throughout the Aegean Extension Region (AER). These are: (1) Çandarlı Bay and Bergama-Zeytindağ Fault Zone, (2) İzmir fault and Orhanlı Fault Zone, and (3) Buldan and surrounding areas. The relatively infrequent occurrence of the great earthquakes in the AER and present hazard parameters obtained by this study suggest that magnitude of a destructive earthquake may reach up to Ms= 6.5. Hence, it is also possible to say that large earthquakes are generally not expected in those related zones because of seismic moment release from small-moderate sized earthquakes.

Özet

West Turkey, one of the most seismically active regions of Turkey, has been analysed to reveal seismic hazard by using fractal behaviour, seismic quiescence z- and Gutenberg-Richter b-parameters. Starting from raw earthquake catalogue, we performed completeness analysis on recorded events, and a final catalogue, could be accepted as homogeneous, was obtained. According to the results obtained from the Frequency-Magnitude Distribution (FMD), seismic activity rates (b- and z-values) and fractal correlation dimension, we detected three anomalous zones throughout the Aegean Extension Region (AER). These are: (1) Çandarlı Bay and Bergama-Zeytindağ Fault Zone, (2) İzmir fault and Orhanlı Fault Zone, and (3) Buldan and surrounding areas. The relatively infrequent occurrence of the great earthquakes in the AER and present hazard parameters obtained by this study suggest that magnitude of a destructive earthquake may reach up to Ms= 6.5. Hence, it is also possible to say that large earthquakes are generally not expected in those related zones because of seismic moment release from small-moderate sized earthquakes.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, O., YILMAZ, E. G. &. D. (2008). Earthquake Hazard of the Aegean Extension Region (West Turkey). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 593–614. https://ajindex.com/articles/384774

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ABİK, Ş., KAFTAN, İ., GEÇİM, E. & POLAT, O. 2005. Seismic hazard assessment of İzmir vicinity by Hurst algorithm. In: Abstracts of the International Earth Sciences Colloquium on the Aegean Region (IESCA), Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, 4–7 October 2005, p. 243. AKI, K. 1965. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N= a – bm and its confidence limits. Bulletin Earthquake Research Institute 43, 237–239.
  2. AKTAR, M., KARABULUT, H., ÖZALAYBEY, S. & CHILDS, D. 2007. A conjugate strike-slip fault system within the extensional tectonics of Western Turkey. Geophysical Journal International doi: 10.1111/j. 1365- 246X.2007.03598.x, 1–13.
  3. AKTUĞ, B. & KILIÇOĞLU, A. 2006.
  4. Recent crustal deformation of İzmir, Western Anatolia and surrounding regions as deduced from repeated GPS measurements and strain field. Journal of Geodynamics 41, 471–484.
  5. AKYOL, N., ZHU, L., MITCHELL, B., SÖZBİLİR, H. & KEKOVALI, K. 2006. Crustal structure and local seismicity in western Anatolia. Geophysical Journal International 166, 1259–1269.
  6. BAYRAK, Y., YILMAZTÜRK, A. & ÖZTÜRK, S. 2002. Lateral variations of the modal (a/b) values for the different regions of the world. Journal of Geodynamics 34, 653–666.
  7. BENETATOS, C., KIRATZI, A., GANAS, A., ZIAZIA, M., PLESSA, A. & DRAKATOS, G. 2006. Strike-slip motions in the Gulf of Sığacık (western Turkey): properties of the 17 October 2005 earthquake seismic sequence. Tectonophysics 426, 263–279.
  8. BOMMER, J., SPENCE, R., ERDİK, M., TABUCHI, S., AYDINOĞLU, N., BOOTH, E., RE, D. & PETERKEN, O. 2002. Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. Journal of Seismology 6, 431–446.
  9. BOZKURT, E. 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey – a synthesis. Geodynamica Acta 14, 3–30.
  10. BOZKURT, E. 2003. Origin of NE-trending basins in western Turkey. Geodinamica Acta 16, 61–81.
  11. BOZKURT, E. & SÖZBİLİR, H. 2004. Tectonic evolution of the Gediz Graben: field evidence for an episodic, two-stage extension in western Turkey. Geological Magazine 141, 63–79.
  12. BOZKURT, E. & SÖZBİLİR, H. 2006. Evolution of the large-scale active Manisa Fault, Southwest Turkey: implications on fault development and regional tectonics. Geodinamica Acta 19, 427– 453. CISTERNAS, A., POLAT, O. & RIVERA, L. 2004. The Marmara Sea region: Seismic behaviour in time and the likelihood of another large earthquake near İstanbul, Turkey. Journal of Seismology 8, 427– 437. DELOUIS, B., GIARDINI, D., LUNDGREN, P. & SALICHON, J. 2002. Joint inversion of InSAR, teleseismic and strong moti