Journals / Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 40

Competition of Maritime and Iron Silk Road within the Scope of Belt and Road Initiative

Kuşak Yol Girişimi Kapsamında Deniz ve Demir İpekyolu’nun Rekabeti

Pages
725–766
Publication Date
2021-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, China's military and economic attitude, especially around the narrow passes of sea, will also be examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Belt and Road Initiative, with the first train reaching Europe from China by passing through Turkey, has increased debate about the effects of the Iron Silk Road and sea transport on Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Setting out from this point, this study aims to compare the current capacities of Iron Silk Road with Maritime Silk Road through container transportation and its expected capacity in the future.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, China's military and economic attitude, especially around the narrow passes of sea, will also be examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kuşak Yol · Deniz İpekyolu · Demir İpekyolu

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative, with the first train reaching Europe from China by passing through Turkey, has increased debate about the effects of the Iron Silk Road and sea transport on Turkey. Setting out from this point, this study aims to compare the current capacities of Iron Silk Road with Maritime Silk Road through container transportation and its expected capacity in the future. This study also aims to summarize the sea and rail routes that are currently used or expected to be used in the scope of the Belt and Road Initiative, the narrow passes on these routes and the difficulties experienced in terms of transportation. In addition, China's military and economic attitude, especially around the narrow passes of sea, will also be examined.

Özet

Kuşak Yol Projesi kapsamında Çin’den yola çıkan ve Türkiye’den geçerek Avrupa’ya ulaşan ilk tren ile birlikte, Demir İpekyolu’nun Türkiye’ye ve deniz taşımacılığına etkisi ile ilgili tartışmalar artmıştır. Bu noktadan yola çıkan çalışma, Demir İpekyolu’nun konteyner taşımacılığı üzerinden Deniz İpekyolu ile güncel kapasitelerini ve gelecekte beklenen kapasitelerini karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, aynı zamanda Kuşak Yol Projesi kapsamında güncel olarak kullanılan veya gelecekte kullanılması beklenen denizyolu ve demiryolu güzergâhları, bu güzergâhlardaki darboğazları ve taşımacılık açısından yaşanan zorlukları da özetlemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bununla beraber Çin’in özellikle deniz darboğazları çevresindeki askerî ve ekonomik tutumu da incelenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, B. E., ERENEL, F. (2021). Competition of Maritime and Iron Silk Road within the Scope of Belt and Road Initiative. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 40, 725–766. https://ajindex.com/articles/383116

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. AHMAD Riaz, MI Hong vd., “Revisiting The Potential Security Threats Linked With The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)”, Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 2020, Vol 1, No 1, 64-80.
  2. ALAM Khalid Mehmood, LI Xuemei vd., “Impact of Transport Cost and Travel Time on Trade Under China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2019, 1-16. AMPONSTİR Fuangfa, “Analisis Of Global Connectivity of Kra İthmus Canal Vision”, Rajapark Journal, 2020, Vol. 14, No 33, 298-307. BUCSKY Peter, “The iron Silk Road: how important is it?”, Area Development and Policy, 2020, Vol. 5, No. 2, 146-166. CHEN Juan, “Strategic Synergy Between Egypt “Vision 2030” and China’s “Belt and Road” Initiative”, Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2018, Vol 11, No 5, 219-235. ÇEVİK Veli Ahmet ve DURUKAN Tülin, “Çin’in Kuzey Kutbu’na Olan İlgisi: Kutup İpek Yolu”, Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 2020, Vol. 20, No. 2, 254-262. GILMARTIN Heather, “The Malacca Straits as Catalyst for Multilateral Security Cooperation”, Sicherheti und Frieden / Security and Peace, 2008, Vol. 26, No. 4, 220-226. HASAN Monjur and JIAN He, “Spratly Islands Dispute in the South China Sea: Potential Solutions”, Journal of East Asia and International Law, 2019, Vol. 12, No. 1, 145-168. MARTINEZ-ZARZOSO Inmaculada, “Alternative Sea Routes: What Effects on Maritime Trade?”, SAIS Review of International Affairs, 2013, Vol 33, No. 2, 61-74. POPESCU Alba Lulia Catrinel, “Control of Key Maritime Straits – China’s Global Strategic Objective”, International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2017, Vol 5, No. 1, 92-119.
  3. TABUR İlhan Tabur, TAĞ Mehmet Nasih vd., “Korsanlık ve Deniz Haydutluğu ile Mücadele: Somali Örneği ve Türkiye’nin Katkıları”, Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2016, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, 1-20. TURZI Mariano, “Latin American Silk Road: China And The Nicaragua Canal”, Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad, 2016, Vol. 12, No. 2, 163-178. TUTAR Filiz Kutluay ve KOÇER Fatma Şura Bahsi, “Çin’in Yeni İpek Yolu Projesi: Bir Kuşak Bir Yol”, Journal Of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 2019, Vol. 5, No. 17, 618-626. UYSAL Onur F., “The Iron Silk Road: How Will Turkey Be Involved?”, Caucasus International, 2016, Vol. 6, No. 1, 55-66. QU Xiaobo and MENG Quiang, “The Economic Importance of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: An Extreme Scenario Analysis”, Transportation Research Part E L