The former is compared with the small Steneofiber from the Upper Miocene of the Middle Europe.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Steneofiber remains collected in Muğla-Yerkesik-Çatakbağyaka are studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This genus is represented by two species: Steneofiber minutus ozansoyi n. ssp. ve Steneofiber cf. jaegeri.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The former is compared with the small Steneofiber from the Upper Miocene of the Middle Europe.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çatakbağyaka · Üst Miyosen · Steneofiber
Abstract
The Steneofiber remains collected in Muğla-Yerkesik-Çatakbağyaka are studied. This genus is represented by two species: Steneofiber minutus ozansoyi n. ssp. ve Steneofiber cf. jaegeri. Kaup. The former is compared with the small Steneofiber from the Upper Miocene of the Middle Europe.
Özet
Muğla-Yerkesik-Çatakbağyaka'dan toplanan Steneofiber kalıntıları incelenmiştir. Bu cins iki türle temsil edilmiştir: Steneofiber minutus ozansoyi n. ssp. ve Steneofiber cf. jaegeri. Kaup. İlki Orta Avrupa Üst Miyosen'inin küçük Steneofiberleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır.
KASAPOĞLU, K. E. (1973). A, Theoretical Analysis of Progressive and Retrogressive Failure in Discontinuous Bock Masses Subjected to 'In-Situ' Shear. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 1–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/382725
Bergounioux, F. - M. ve Crouzel, F., 1964, Sur quelques Castorides du bassin d`Aquitaine: Bull. Soc. Géol. de France, (7). VI, 253- 258. Calvert, F. ve Neumayr, M., 1880, Die jungen Ablagerungen Am Hellespont: Denk. Kaiser Akad. Wiss. Math. nat. Classe, 40, 357-378
Gervais, P., 1858-1862, Zoologie et paleontologie françaises: 2 vol. texte 1 atlas. Meyer, H., 1838-1858, Briefwechsel in Neues Jahrb. für Miner. Geol. Pal., p. 414. Pamir, H. N. ve Soyar, A. M., 1933, Küçükcekmece fosil fıkralı hayvanlar mecmuası: İst. Üniv. Jeol. Enst. neş. No. 8, 119 s. Schlosser, M., 1885, Die Nager des europaischen Tertiars: Palaeontographica, Bd. 31, 19-143.
Schreuder, A., 1931,
Conodontes, Trogontherium and the other Castoridae: Palaeont. Z., 13, 1-4, 148-177.
SickenB.berg, Gazıry, O.,, W. Becker-Platen, Heissig,. Hünermann D., Benda,,L. K. A., Berg- Sondaar, D., Engesser, P. Y., f Schmidt-kittler, N., Staesche, K., Staesche, U., Steffens, P., Tobien, H., 1975, Die Gliederung des höheren Jungtertiars und Altqaıartars inder Türkei nach Vertebraen und ihre Bedeutung für die internationale Neogen-Stratigraphie (Kanozoikum und Braunkohlen der Türkei. 17): Geol. Jb., B 15, 167 s Stromer, E., 1928, Wirbeltiere im Obermiocanen Flinz Münchens: Abh. der Bayer. Akad. Wiss. Math. Naturw. Abh. 32. 18-20.
Simpson, G. G., 1945, The principles of classification and a classification of mammals: Bull. of the Amer. Mus. of Nat. Hist, 85, 350 s Ünay, E., 1976, Çanakkale Bölgesinde bulunan Steneofiber jaegeri (Rodentia, Mammalia): Maden Tetkik Arama Derg., 86, 93-98.