Journals / Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni / 1977 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

The Upper Miocene Steneofibers (Rodentia, Mammalia) of Çatakbağyaka

Çatakbağyaka Üst Miyosen Steneofiber'leri (Rodentia, Mammalia)

Pages
69–72
Publication Date
1977-02-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The former is compared with the small Steneofiber from the Upper Miocene of the Middle Europe.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Steneofiber remains collected in Muğla-Yerkesik-Çatakbağyaka are studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This genus is represented by two species: Steneofiber minutus ozansoyi n. ssp. ve Steneofiber cf. jaegeri.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The former is compared with the small Steneofiber from the Upper Miocene of the Middle Europe.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çatakbağyaka · Üst Miyosen · Steneofiber

Abstract

The Steneofiber remains collected in Muğla-Yerkesik-Çatakbağyaka are studied. This genus is represented by two species: Steneofiber minutus ozansoyi n. ssp. ve Steneofiber cf. jaegeri. Kaup. The former is compared with the small Steneofiber from the Upper Miocene of the Middle Europe.

Özet

Muğla-Yerkesik-Çatakbağyaka'dan toplanan Steneofiber kalıntıları incelenmiştir. Bu cins iki türle temsil edilmiştir: Steneofiber minutus ozansoyi n. ssp. ve Steneofiber cf. jaegeri. Kaup. İlki Orta Avrupa Üst Miyosen'inin küçük Steneofiberleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAY, E. (1977). The Upper Miocene Steneofibers (Rodentia, Mammalia) of Çatakbağyaka. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 69–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/382724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Bergounioux, F. - M. ve Crouzel, F., 1964, Sur quelques Castorides du bassin d`Aquitaine: Bull. Soc. Géol. de France, (7). VI, 253- 258. Calvert, F. ve Neumayr, M., 1880, Die jungen Ablagerungen Am Hellespont: Denk. Kaiser Akad. Wiss. Math. nat. Classe, 40, 357-378
  2. Gervais, P., 1858-1862, Zoologie et paleontologie françaises: 2 vol. texte 1 atlas. Meyer, H., 1838-1858, Briefwechsel in Neues Jahrb. für Miner. Geol. Pal., p. 414. Pamir, H. N. ve Soyar, A. M., 1933, Küçükcekmece fosil fıkralı hayvanlar mecmuası: İst. Üniv. Jeol. Enst. neş. No. 8, 119 s. Schlosser, M., 1885, Die Nager des europaischen Tertiars: Palaeontographica, Bd. 31, 19-143.
  3. Schreuder, A., 1931,
  4. Conodontes, Trogontherium and the other Castoridae: Palaeont. Z., 13, 1-4, 148-177.
  5. SickenB.berg, Gazıry, O.,, W. Becker-Platen, Heissig,. Hünermann D., Benda,,L. K. A., Berg- Sondaar, D., Engesser, P. Y., f Schmidt-kittler, N., Staesche, K., Staesche, U., Steffens, P., Tobien, H., 1975, Die Gliederung des höheren Jungtertiars und Altqaıartars inder Türkei nach Vertebraen und ihre Bedeutung für die internationale Neogen-Stratigraphie (Kanozoikum und Braunkohlen der Türkei. 17): Geol. Jb., B 15, 167 s Stromer, E., 1928, Wirbeltiere im Obermiocanen Flinz Münchens: Abh. der Bayer. Akad. Wiss. Math. Naturw. Abh. 32. 18-20.
  6. Simpson, G. G., 1945, The principles of classification and a classification of mammals: Bull. of the Amer. Mus. of Nat. Hist, 85, 350 s Ünay, E., 1976, Çanakkale Bölgesinde bulunan Steneofiber jaegeri (Rodentia, Mammalia): Maden Tetkik Arama Derg., 86, 93-98.