SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Web 2.0 Applications Constructed on Learning Theories: Investigation Science Direct Database

Öğrenme Teorileri Üzerine İnşa Edilen Web 2.0 Uygulamaları: Science Direct Veri Tabanı İncelenmesi

Arif TOPUZ
Önder YILDIRIM
Fatma TOPU
Yüksel GÖKTAŞ
Pages
59–69
Publication Date
2015-05-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it is found that the most academic studies on the social network applications have been conducted in Web 2.0 applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:— The purpose of this research is the determination of the learning theories, which have been built by Web 2.0 applications between 2004 and 2013 as a matter of teaching technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Science Direct database is investigated and 103 articles are found and analyzed with the document analysis method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it is found that the most academic studies on the social network applications have been conducted in Web 2.0 applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Web 2.0 uygulamaları · öğrenme teorileri · öğretim teknolojileri

Abstract

— The purpose of this research is the determination of the learning theories, which have been built by Web 2.0 applications between 2004 and 2013 as a matter of teaching technology. Science Direct database is investigated and 103 articles are found and analyzed with the document analysis method. According to the results, it is found that the most academic studies on the social network applications have been conducted in Web 2.0 applications. In addition, the most of the academic studies on the constructive, social and situational learning theories have been conducted in those learning theories. It has been determined that the academic studies having Web 2.0 applications were built on the learning theories started by 2008 and most of the studies were made in 2013. With this study, researchers who want to use Web 2.0 applications in learning environments can develop Learning Technologies-oriented perspectives that could be appropriate for study target and scope

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; öğretim teknolojileri alanında 2000-2013 yılları arasında web 2.0 uygulamaları kullanılarak yapılan akademik çalışmaların hangi öğrenme teorileri üzerine inşa edildiğini belirlemektir. Belirlenen anahtar kelimelerle Science Direct veri tabanında tarama yapılmış ve belirlenen 324 makale doküman incelemesi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; web 2.0 uygulamalarından en fazla “sosyal ağ uygulamaları”, öğrenme teorilerinden ise en fazla “yapılandırmacı, sosyal ve durumsal öğrenme teorileri” üzerine akademik çalışmaların olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Web 2.0 uygulamalarının öğrenme teorisi üzerine inşa edilerek kullanıldığı akademik çalışmaların 2008 yılı itibariyle başladığı ve en fazla çalışmanın 2013 yılında yapıldığı belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma ile web 2.0 uygulamalarını öğrenme ortamlarında kullanmak isteyenler; çalışma kapsamına ve hedeflerine uygun olabilecek öğrenme teorilerine yönelik perspektif geliştirebilirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPUZ, A., YILDIRIM, Ö., TOPU, F., GÖKTAŞ, Y. (2015). Web 2.0 Applications Constructed on Learning Theories: Investigation Science Direct Database. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 59–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/382033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Silva, J. M., Rahman, A. S., & El Saddik, A. (2008). Web 3.0: a vision for bridging the gap between real and virtual. Paper presented at the 1st ACM international workshop on Communicability design and evaluation in cultural and ecological multimedia system, Vancouver British Columbia, Canada
  2. Genç, Z. (2010, Şubat). Web 2.0 yeniliklerinin eğitimde kullanımı: Bir facebook eğitim uygulama örneği, Akademik Bilişim'10 - XII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri, Muğla Üniversitesi. _____
  3. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0, O'Reilly Media, Inc. _____http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.> (2014 Ekim 21
  4. Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students? Innovate Journal of Online Education, 3(4), 6
  5. Akçay, A., & Arslan, A. (2010). The using of blogs in Turkish education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1195-1199
  6. Carmichael, P., & Burchmore, H. (2010). Social software and academic practice: Postgraduate students as co-designers of Web 2.0 tools. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 233-241
  7. Kovacic, A., Bubas, G., & Coric, A. (2012). Mobilising students' grammar skills through collaborative e-tivities with Web 2.0 tools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, 132-136
  8. Laire, D., Casteleyn, J., & Mottart, A. (2012). Social media's learning outcomes within writing instruction in the EFL classroom: Exploring, implementing and analyzing storify. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 442-448
  9. Magnuson, M. L. (2013). Web 2.0 and information literacy instruction: Aligning technology with ACRL standards. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(3), 244-251
  10. Chan, Y. M. (2010). Video instructions as support for beyond classroom learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1313- 1318
  11. New Media Consortium & The EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, The Horizon Report. (2008). The New Media Consortium. _____
  12. Baltaci-Goktalay, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2010). Pre-service teachers' perceptions about web 2.0 technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4737-4741
  13. Schunk, D. (2009). Öğrenme teorileri: Eğitimsel bir bakışla. Çeviren: M. Şahin. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım: Ankara
  14. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
  15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly