Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Divorce in Turkish Society: Personal and Family of Origin Characteristics

Türk Toplumunda Boşanma: Kişisel ve Kök Aile Özellikleri

Pages
1003–1032
Publication Date
2021-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was concluded that the participants had too much difficulty in couple relationships, and the relationships were affected from the family of origin relationships, premarital experiences and socio-cultural elements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to examine the couple relationships of adult individuals whose marriage experience resulted in divorce, their perspectives regarding the relational interactions with divorce and the interactions with their family of origin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, data was collected from the participants through the interview technique in the spring term of 2019, and the content analysis method was used to analyze the data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was concluded that the participants had too much difficulty in couple relationships, and the relationships were affected from the family of origin relationships, premarital experiences and socio-cultural elements.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çift ilişkisi · evlilik · boşanma

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the couple relationships of adult individuals whose marriage experience resulted in divorce, their perspectives regarding the relational interactions with divorce and the interactions with their family of origin. The study is a descriptive one, and employs the phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods. In this study, data was collected from the participants through the interview technique in the spring term of 2019, and the content analysis method was used to analyze the data. The study group consisted of 39 divorced (27 female; 12 male) individuals aged between 23-55, who did not have any psychiatric diagnosis and living in a city center in Central Anatolia. Semi-structured interview form was used to collect data. As a result, it was concluded that the participants had too much difficulty in couple relationships, and the relationships were affected from the family of origin relationships, premarital experiences and socio-cultural elements.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, evlilik deneyimi boşanma ile sonuçlanmış yetişkin bireylerin çift ilişkileri ve boşanma sürecine ilişkin kendi bireysel deneyimleri, boşanmaya ilişkin ilişkisel ve kök aileleri ile olan etkileşimlerine dair bakış açılarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma betimsel bir araştırma olup nitel araştırma desenlerinden olgubilim deseninde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu araştırmada veriler 2019 yılı bahar döneminde görüşme tekniği ile toplanmış ve verilerin analizi için içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, Türkiye'de İç Anadolu'da bir ilde şehir merkezinde yaşayan ve psikiyatrik tanısı olmayan 23-55 yaş arası boşanmış 39 (27 kadın, 12 erkek) kişiden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplamak için yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, katılımcıların çift ilişkilerinde çok fazla güçlük çektikleri ve evliliklerinde kök aile ilişkilerinden, evlilik öncesi deneyimlerden ve sosyo-kültürel unsurlardan etkilendikleri sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇARSLAN, S., ŞAHAN, B. (2021). Divorce in Turkish Society: Personal and Family of Origin Characteristics. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 1003–1032. https://ajindex.com/articles/381887

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akgün, R. & Polat-Uluocak, G. (2010). Effective communication and problem solving for marriage: A group work with women in a community center. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 23 (23), 9-22.
  2. Aktaş, G. (2013). Woman’s identity in the context of feminist discourse: Being a woman in a male dominated society. Journal of Faculty of Letters, 30(1), 53-72.
  3. Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children's well-being: A metaanalysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 557-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353560
  4. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 26-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.26
  5. Anthony, C. J., DiPerna, J. C., & Amato, P. R. (2014). Divorce, approaches to learning, and children's academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis of mediated and moderated effects. Journal of School Psychology, 52(3), 249-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.03.003
  6. Arıkan, Ç. (1996). Halkın boşanmaya ilişkin tutumları araştırması (Public attitudes towards divorce research). T.C. Başbakanlık Aile ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Bilim Serisi: 96, Öncü Ltd Şti. Ankara.
  7. Belsky, J., & Kelly, J. (1994). Transition to parenthood: How a first child changes a marriage: Which couples grow closer or apart, and why? Delacorte Press.
  8. Beşpınar, F., & Beşpınar, L. (2017). Household structure in Turkey and practical in double wedding picture: reflections of changes also the traditions. Nüfusbilim Dergisi, 39 (1), 109-149.
  9. Binay, M. (2018). Analysis of the Causes for Divorce in Turkey and Alternative Dispute Methods. Ombudsman Akademik, 5 (9), 237-267.
  10. Bohannon, P. (1970). Divorce and after. NY: Doubleday. Booth, A., & Amato, P. R. (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce wellbeing. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 197-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741- 3737.2001.00197.x Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. J. Guerin. (Ed.), Family Therapy (pp. 42- 90) NY: Gardner. Bumpass, L. L. & Sweet, J. A. (1972). Differentails in marital instability: 1970, American Sociological Review, 37(6), ss. 754-766.
  11. Booth, A., & Edwards, J. N. (1985). Age at marriage and marital instability, Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(1), 67-75.
  12. Burns, A.,