SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü University International Journal of Social Sciences (INIJOSS) / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

REPUTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOOK AT THE UNIVERSITY THROUGH THE EYES OF THE PUBLIC

YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE İTİBAR: HALKIN GÖZÜNDEN ÜNİVERSİTEYE BİR BAKIŞ

Berat ÇİÇEK
Vedat ALMALI
Pages
90–111
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, it was concluded that the university has the highest reputation in terms of social responsibility dimension which is one of the sub-dimensions of corporate reputation and that its reputation in public is positive in general.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, how the universities are perceived by the societies and the basic dynamics underlying this perception were analyzed through the institutional reputation theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a quantitative study was carried out on Muş Alparslan University (MSU).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, it was concluded that the university has the highest reputation in terms of social responsibility dimension which is one of the sub-dimensions of corporate reputation and that its reputation in public is positive in general.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal İtibar · İmaj · Yükseköğretim

Abstract

In this study, how the universities are perceived by the societies and the basic dynamics underlying this perception were analyzed through the institutional reputation theory. For this purpose, a quantitative study was carried out on Muş Alparslan University (MSU). A survey study was conducted with MSU's external stakeholders to collect data. It was aimed to reveal how the stakeholders perceive the university according to the findings of the collected data. In this context, it was concluded that the university has the highest reputation in terms of social responsibility dimension which is one of the sub-dimensions of corporate reputation and that its reputation in public is positive in general.

Özet

Kurumsal itibar bir kurumla ilgili insanların zihninde oluşan olumlu veya olumsuz yargıların bütününü içermektedir. Bu çalışmada, içinde bulundukları toplumun üniversiteleri nasıl algıladıkları ve bu algının altında yatan temel dinamikler kurumsal itibar kuramı ile irdelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi (MŞÜ) özelinde nicel bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmaya veri toplamak için MŞÜ’nün dış paydaşlarıyla bir anket çalışması uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada üniversitenin paydaşları konumunda olan lise öğrencileri, özel sektör ve kamu çalışanları, esnaflar gibi çeşitli çevreler örneklem olarak seçilmiştir. Toplanan verilerden elde edilen bulgulara göre paydaşların üniversiteyi nasıl algıladıklarının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda üniversitenin, kurumsal itibarın alt boyutlarından olan sosyal sorumluluk boyutu yönüyle en yüksek itibara sahip olduğu ve genel anlamda halk nezdindeki itibarının olumlu olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEK, B., ALMALI, V. (2019). REPUTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A LOOK AT THE UNIVERSITY THROUGH THE EYES OF THE PUBLIC. İnönü University International Journal of Social Sciences (INIJOSS), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 90–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/3814

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adeosun, L. P. K., & Ganiyu, R. A. (2013). Corporate reputation as a strategic asset. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2). AHD. (2019). Reputation. Retrieved from https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=reputation
  2. Anderson, C., & Shirako, A. (2008). Are individuals' reputations related to their history of behavior? Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(2), 320. Balmer, J. M. (1998). Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(8), 963-996.
  3. Balmer, J. M., & Gray, E. R. (1999). Corporate identity and corporate communications: creating a competitive advantage. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 171-177.
  4. Cambridge. (2019). Reputation. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/turkish/reputation
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education: Routledge. Den Hond, F., Rehbein, K. A., de Bakker, F. G., & Lankveld, H. K. v. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 790-813.
  6. Dolphin, R. R. (2004). Corporate reputation–a value creating strategy. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 4(3), 77-92.
  7. Ettenson, R., & Knowles, J. (2008). Dont confuse reputation with brand. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 19. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of management journal, 33(2), 233-258.
  8. Fombrun, C. J. (2001). Corporate reputations as economic asset: Blackwell Publishers Oxford. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation Quotient SM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241-255.
  9. Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. (2004). Fame and fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations. New Jersey: FT Prentice Hall. Goldberg, A. I., Cohen, G., & Fiegenbaum, A. (2003). Reputation building: Small business strategies for successful venture development. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 168-186.
  10. Gotsi, M., & Wilson, A. M. (2001). Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corporate communications: An international journal, 6(1), 24-30.
  11. Hanson, D., & Stuart, H. (2001). Failing the reputation management test: The case of BHP, the big Australian. Corporate reputation review, 4(2), 128-143.
  12. Işık, E. Y.