Journals / Bağımlılık Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Relationship between Nomophobia Level and School Success among University Students

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Nomofobi Düzeyleri İle Okul Başarısı Arasındaki İlişki

Pages
130–138
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Significant differences were found between some subscales and mean overall scale scores of the questionnaire based on the variables such as gender, daily frequency of checking smartphones, state of having a charger besides and checking the smartphone as soon as waking up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to determine any possible relationship between school success and nomophobia level among the university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: This cross-sectional and descriptive type study was conducted during June 1-15, 2019 in the health vocational school of a state university located in Zonguldak city.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Significant differences were found between some subscales and mean overall scale scores of the questionnaire based on the variables such as gender, daily frequency of checking smartphones, state of having a charger besides and checking the smartphone as soon as waking up.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Nomofobi · üniversite öğrencileri · okul başarısı

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine any possible relationship between school success and nomophobia level among the university students. Method: This cross-sectional and descriptive type study was conducted during June 1-15, 2019 in the health vocational school of a state university located in Zonguldak city. Study data were collected by Student Information Form and Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q). Results: Nomophobia level was mild in 25.8%, moderate in 54.2% and severe in 19.8% of the students. Significant differences were found between some subscales and mean overall scale scores of the questionnaire based on the variables such as gender, daily frequency of checking smartphones, state of having a charger besides and checking the smartphone as soon as waking up. Conclusion: No significant diferences were found between Grade Point Average (GPA) of the students and their total and subscale scores from the questionnaire.

Özet

Amaç: Araştırma üniversite öğrencilerinde okul başarısı ile nomofobi düzeyleri arasında herhangi bir ilişkinin olup olmadığının belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Araştırma, 1 Nisan-30 Nisan 2019 tarihleri arasında Zonguldak ilinde bulunan bir devlet üniversitesinin sağlık eğitimi veren meslek yüksekokulunda yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri Öğrenci Bilgi Formu ve Nomofobi Ölçeği (NMP-Q) ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin %25.8’inin hafif düzeyde nomofobi, %54.2’sinin orta düzeyde nomofobi ve %19.8’inin aşırı düzeyde nomofobi seviyesine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada cinsiyet, akıllı telefonu günlük kontrol etme sıklığı, şarj aletini yanında bulundurma durumu, uyanınca hemen akıllı telefonu kontrol etme değişkenlerine göre nomofobi ölçeğinin bazı alt boyutları ve genel toplam ölçek puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Öğrencilerin genel akademik not ortalaması (GANO) değerleri ile nomofobi ölçeğinin toplam ve alt boyut puanları arasında anlamlı farklılık olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZSAVRAN, M., AYYILDIZ, T. (2022). Relationship between Nomophobia Level and School Success among University Students. Bağımlılık Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 130–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/381186

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Lee S, Tam CL, Chie QT. Mobile phone usage preferences: The contributing factors of personality, social anxiety and loneliness. Soc Indicat Res 2014; 118(3): 1205-1228
  2. Cho S, Lee E. Distraction by smartphone use during clinical practice and opinions about smartphone restriction policies: A cross-sectional descriptive study of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2016; 40: 128-133
  3. Gökçearslan Ş, Mumcu FK, Haşlaman T, Çevik YD. Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self- efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 63: 639-649
  4. Alosaimi FD, Alyahya H, Alshahwan H, Mahyijari AlN, Shaik SA. Smartphone addiction among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2016; 37(6): 675-683
  5. Gezgin DM, Cakir O, Yildirim S. The relationship between levels of nomophobia prevalence and internet addiction among high school students: The factors influencing Nomophobia. International Journal of Research in Education and Science 2018; 4(1): 215-225
  6. Park N, Kim YC, Shon HY, Shim H. Factors influencing smartphone use and dependency in South Korea. Comput Hum Behav 2013; 29(4): 1763-1770
  7. Beyens I, Frison E, Eggermont S. “I don’t want to miss a thing”: Adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 64: 1-8
  8. Jena R. Compulsive use of smartphone and technostress: A study among Indian students. International Journal of Business and Economics Research 2015; 13(1): 353-362
  9. Maurya P, Penuli Y, Kunwar A, Lalia H, Negi V, Williams A, et al. Impact of mobile phone usage on psychosocial wellbeing of student nurses. Journal of Nursing and Health Science (IOSR) 2014; 3(6): 39-42 10. Aman T, Shah N, Hussain A, Khan A, Asif S, Qazi A. Effects of mobile phone use on the social and academic performance of students of a public sector medical college in khyber pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Khyber Journal of Medical Sciences 2015; 8(1): 99-103
  10. Ifeanyi IP, Chukwuere JE. The impact of using smartphones on the academic performance of undergraduate students. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal 2018; 10(3): 290-308
  11. Pellowe EL, Cooper A, Mattingly BA. Are smart phones inhibiting smartness? Smart phone presence, mobile phone anxiety, and cognitive performance. Undergraduate Journal of Psychology 2015; 28(1): 20-25
  12. Abu-Shanab E, Haddad E. The influence of sm