Giant kidney stone: multi-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy with 12 accesses

Objective & Hypothesis:We report a case of a 37-year-old man with a body mass index of 28 kg/m2 who presented to our outpatient clinic with intermittent left flank pain.

📊

Key Findings & Data:This giant kidney stone was successfully treated with 3 sessions of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with a total 12 accesses.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant reduction in the split function of the kidney after PNL

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We report a case of a 37-year-old man with a body mass index of 28 kg/m2 who presented to our outpatient clinic with intermittent left flank pain. Non-contrast abdominopelvic computed tomography revealed a giant coralliform calculus in the left kidney. This giant kidney stone was successfully treated with 3 sessions of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with a total 12 accesses. There was no significant reduction in the split function of the kidney after PNL

Özet

Otuz yedi yaşında ve vücut kitle indeksi 28 kg/m2 olan erkek hasta aralıklı sol yan ağrısı şikayeti ile kliniğimize başvurdu. Yapılan kontrassız bilgisayarlı tomografisinde sol böbrekte dev koraliform taş tespit edildi. Hasta 3 seans perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) ile toplamda 12 giriş yapılarak başarılı bir şekilde tedavi edildi. PNL operasyonları sonrasında böbrek fonksiyonunda belirgin düşme görülmedi

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBİN, A., YÜRÜK, E., BİNBAY, M., MÜSLÜMANOĞLU, A. Y. (2015). Giant kidney stone: multi-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy with 12 accesses. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 155–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/380029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, Tepeler A, Esen T, et al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey. I: Changing characteristics of urolithiasis. Urol Res 2011;39:309-14. [CrossRef] 2. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, et al. Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Pannel summary report on the management of staghorn calculi. The AUA Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel. J Urol 1994;151:1648-51. 3. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. 2014. p. 46-8. 4. Barnaba D, Grossi FS, Raguso M, Larocca M, Salustio G, Di Lena S, et al. Percutaneous treatment of staghorn stones: a retrospective case-control study with evaluation of single vs multiple access to the kidney. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2009;81:40-2. 5. Healy KA, Ogan K. Pathophysiology and management of infectious staghorn calculi. Urol Clin North Am 2007;34:363-74. [CrossRef] 6. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guidelines on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991-2000. [CrossRef] 7. Handa RK, Evan AP, Willis LR, Johnson CD, Connars BA, Gao S, et al. Renal functional effects of multiple-tract percutaneous access. J Endourol 2009;23:1951-6. [CrossRef] 8. Akman T, Sari E, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Tepeler A, Kaba M, et al. Comparison of outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn calculi in those with single and multiple accesses. J Endourol 2010;24:955-60. [CrossRef] 9. Traxer O, Smith TG, Pearle MS, Corwin TS, Saboorian H, Cadeddu JA. Renal parenchymal injury after standard and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2001;165:1693-5. [CrossRef]