Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2015 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Morbid obezite üreter üst uç taşlarına uygulanan ESWL'nin başarı ve komplikasyon oranlarını etkiler mi?

Does morbid obesity influence the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones?

Pages
20–23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall stone-free rate was 82% in group 1 and 67% in group 2 (p=0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the current study was to investigate whether obesity influences the outcome of extra- corporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment for upper ureteral stones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: This is a retrospective study of 134 patients who underwent ESWL between June 2011 and May 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall stone-free rate was 82% in group 1 and 67% in group 2 (p=0.01).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the current study was to investigate whether obesity influences the outcome of extra- corporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment for upper ureteral stones. Material and methods: This is a retrospective study of 134 patients who underwent ESWL between June 2011 and May 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 94 patients of normal weight, and group 2 comprised 40 morbidly obese patients. Patients in both groups had upper ureteral stones. Results: The mean age of groups 1 and 2 was 45.6±12.1 and 45.3±15.5 years, respectively (p=0.98). There was no significant difference in demographic variables between the groups. The mean stone size in Groups 1 and 2 was 81.7±25.7 mm² and 86.3±22.4 mm², respectively (p=0.51), the mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.4±2.9 and 42.9±2.1, respectively (p<0.01), the mean number of ESWL sessions was 2.4±0.6 and 2.4±0.7, respectively (p=0.97), and the mean follow-up time was 7.1±3.4 and 6.6±2.8 weeks, respectively (p=0.67). The overall stone-free rate was 82% in group 1 and 67% in group 2 (p=0.01). Conclusion: It is well-known that morbidly obese patients have higher rates of anesthesia-related problems due to the comorbidities commonly observed in this population. In the current study, we found that ESWL is a safe and acceptable treatment option for morbidly obese patients with upper ureteral stones.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada obezitenin vücut dışından şok dalga tedavisi (ESWL) sonuçları üzerindeki etkisini araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntemler: Retrospektif olarak yapılan bu çalışmada Haziran 2011 ve Mayıs 2014 yılları arasında ESWL yapılmış 134 hasta değerlendirildi. ESWL yapılan hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı. İki grupda üreter üst uç taşına sahipdi. Grup 1 94 normal kiloya sahip, grup 2 ise 40 morbid obez hastadan oluşmaktaydı. Bulgular: Grup 1 ve 2 için ortalama yaşları sırasıyla 45,6±12,1 ve 45,3±15,5di (p=0,98). Gruplar arasında demografik veriler açısından istatistiksel fark saptanmadı. Taş boyutu ve vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) grup 1 ve grup 2 için sırasıyla 81,7±25,7 mm² ve 86,3±22,4 mm² (p=0,51), 27,4±2,9 ve 42,9±2,1 (p<0,01) olarak bulundu. Ortalama hastalara uygulanan ESWL seansı sayısı 2,4±0,6 ve 2,4±0,7 (p=0,97) ve takip süresi 7,1±3,4 ve 6,6±2,8 haftaydı (p=0,67). Tam taşsızlık oranları grup 1 ve 2 için %82 ve %67 olarak bulundu ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p=0,01). Sonuç: Morbid obez hastaların eşlik eden birçok komorbidite sebebiyle anesteziye bağlı komplikasyonlara daha fazla yatkın oldukları bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmada biz ESWLnin morbid obez hastalar için güvenli ve kabul edilebilir bir seçenek olduğunu bulduk.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDE, O., ŞENER, N. C., BAŞ, O., DEDE, G., BAĞBANCI, M. Ş. (2015). Morbid obezite üreter üst uç taşlarına uygulanan ESWL'nin başarı ve komplikasyon oranlarını etkiler mi?. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 20–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/380004

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, et al. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol 1997
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Tiselius HG. How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave litho- tripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones? J Endourol 2008
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Ogden CL, Yanovski SZ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. The epidemiol- ogy of obesity. Gastroenterology 2007
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Sutherland JW, Parks JH, Coe FL. Recurrence after a single renal stone in a community practice. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1985
  5. Lingeman JE MB. Surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. Wein AJ KL, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editor. Philadelphia: Saunders
  6. p. 1375-7. 6. Erturk E, Herrman E, Cockett AT. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones. J Urol 1993
  7. Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Panagopoulos G, Bruno JJ, Fracchia JA. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units. Urology 2005
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Turk C KT, Petrik A, Sarica K Guidelines on urolithiasis 2013. Available from: http://www.uroweb.org/publications/eau-guide- lines. 9. Deem S, Defade B, Modak A, Emmett M, Martinez F, Davalos J. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones. Urology 2011
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 2007
  10. [CrossRef] 11. Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephroli- thotomy equivalent? J Endourol 2011
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Koo BC, Burtt G, Burgess NA. Percutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass index. BJU Int 2004
  12. [CrossRef] 13. Choban PS, Flancbaum L. The impact of obesity on surgical out- comes: a review. J Am Coll Surg 1997
  13. [CrossRef] 14. Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, Lianos E, Mavromanolakis E. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J Endourol 2003
  14. [CrossRef] 15. Thomas R, Cass AS. Extracorporeal shock