Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of outcomes in malignant vs. non-malignant ischemic priapism: 12-year experience from a tertiary center

Pages
340–344
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prevalenceof erectile dysfunction in patients at follow-up was high.Conclusion: Men with malignant priapism (CML) had significantly lower success rates with interventions,prolonged hospital stay, and higher complications than men with non-malignant priapism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Data on outcome of patients with ischemic priapism (IP) due to malignant causes are scant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inthis study, we compared outcome of patients with malignant vs. non-malignant IP in adult North Indian men.Material and methods: We analyzed medical records of patients with IP who presented to a large tertiarycare referral center from August 2005 to July 2017.Results: Data of 71 patients were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prevalenceof erectile dysfunction in patients at follow-up was high.Conclusion: Men with malignant priapism (CML) had significantly lower success rates with interventions,prolonged hospital stay, and higher complications than men with non-malignant priapism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Data on outcome of patients with ischemic priapism (IP) due to malignant causes are scant. Inthis study, we compared outcome of patients with malignant vs. non-malignant IP in adult North Indian men.Material and methods: We analyzed medical records of patients with IP who presented to a large tertiarycare referral center from August 2005 to July 2017.Results: Data of 71 patients were analyzed. The median age was 30 years (range 17-65). The average duration of symptoms was 4.39 days (range 1-10). Most common etiology was idiopathic in 29 (40.84%), chronicmyeloid leukemia (CML) in 24 (33.80%), and drug-induced in 15 patients. Thirty-eight patients underwentdistal shunts, while nine patients underwent proximal shunt procedure. Men with malignant priapism (CML)had significantly lower success rates with interventions, prolonged hospital stay, and higher complications(p<0.05). Most complications after shunt surgery were minor (Clavein grade 1 and 2). After shunt surgery,bleeding at shunt site was observed in 14 cases, and wound infection developed in five patients. Prevalenceof erectile dysfunction in patients at follow-up was high.Conclusion: Men with malignant priapism (CML) had significantly lower success rates with interventions,prolonged hospital stay, and higher complications than men with non-malignant priapism.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUMAR, M., Garg, G., SHARMA, A., PANDEY, S., SINGH, M., SANKHWAR, S. N. (2019). Comparison of outcomes in malignant vs. non-malignant ischemic priapism: 12-year experience from a tertiary center. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 340–344. https://ajindex.com/articles/379953

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Broderick GA, Kadioglu A, Bivalacqua TJ, Ghanem H, Nehra A, Shamloul R. Priapism: pathogenesis, epidemiology, and manage- ment. J Sex Med 2010
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Roghmann F, Becker A, Sammon JD, Ouerghi M, Sun M, Suku- mar S, et al. Incidence of priapism in emergency departments in the United States. J Urol 2013
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Spycher MA, Hauri D. The ultrastructure of the erectile tissue in priapism. J Urol 1986
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Ahmed M, Augustine B, Matthew M, Awaisu M, Sudi A, Hamza KB, et al. Prognostic Factors and Outcome of Management of Ischemic Priapism in Zaria, Nigeria. Niger J Surg 2017
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Salonia A, Eardley I, Giuliano F, Hatzichristou D, Moncada I, Vardi Y, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on pria- pism. Eur Urol 2014
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Al-Shaiji TF. Achieving detumescence of ischemic priapism with intra-cavernosal injection of fentanyl: an unexpected outcome of miscommunication error. Curr Drug Saf 2011
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Pal DK, Biswal DK, Ghosh B. Outcome and erectile function fol- lowing treatment of priapism: An institutional experience. Urol Ann 2016
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey. Ann Surg 2004
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Tang Z, Li D, Zhang X, Yi L, Zhu X, Zeng X, et al. Comparison of the simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) in patients of erectile dysfunction with different pathophysiologies. BMC Urol 2014
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Burnett AL. Therapy insight: Priapism associated with hemato- logic dyscrasias. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2005
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Ekeke ON, Omunakwe HE, Eke N. Management of priapism in adult men. Int Surg 2015
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Aghaji AE. Priapism in adult Nigerians. BJU Int 2000
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Adetayo FO. Outcome of management of acute prolonged pria- pism in patients with homozygous sickle cell disease.WestAfr J Med2009
  14. Cherian J, Rao AR, Thwaini A, KapasiF,Shergill IS, Samman R. Medical and surgical management of priapism. Postgrad Med J 2006
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Spagnul SJ, Cabral PH,VerndlDO, Glina S. Adrenergic alpha- blockers: an infrequent and overlooked cause of priapism. Int J Impot Res 2011
  16. [CrossRef] 16. AltmanAL,SeftelAD,BrownSL,HampelN.Cocaineassociated priapism. J Urol 1999
  17. [CrossRef] 17. Shaeer OK,