Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2020 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 6

Prostate cancer detection rate and Gleason score in relation to prostate volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy

Pages
449–454
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This increase in high ISUP Grade lesions with the rise in PV is due to the use of MRI during prostate biopsy with standard biopsy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to assess the relationship of the prostate cancer and Gleason scores (GSs) or ISUP Grade system with prostate volume (PV) as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy.Material and methods: Data were collected from 659 patients who underwent MRI cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy from January 2014 to January 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The biopsies were performed because of increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This increase in high ISUP Grade lesions with the rise in PV is due to the use of MRI during prostate biopsy with standard biopsy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to assess the relationship of the prostate cancer and Gleason scores (GSs) or ISUP Grade system with prostate volume (PV) as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy.Material and methods: Data were collected from 659 patients who underwent MRI cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy from January 2014 to January 2018. The biopsies were performed because of increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings. Transrectal ultrasound was used to measure PV.Results: Prostate cancer detection rates in patients with increased PVs of ≤40 cc and >40 cc were 68.8% and 51.6% (p 40 cc were 68% and 73%, and 22.3% and 37.8%, respectively, for those with ISUP Grade group ≥4 (Gleason score ≥8) (p=0.003). Among the patients with PV>40 cc, univariate logistic regression showed a significant relationship between ISUP Grade group ≥2 and PSA, free/total PSA, PSA density, and MRI (p 40 cc.Conclusion: Although the detection rates of prostate cancer decreased as PV increased, the detection of prostate cancer aggressiveness increased as PV increased. This increase in high ISUP Grade lesions with the rise in PV is due to the use of MRI during prostate biopsy with standard biopsy.

🔖

Cite This Article

NEPAL, S. P., NAKASATO, T., OGAWA, Y., NAOE, M., SHICHIJO, T., MAEDA, Y., MORITA, J., OSHINOMI, K., UNOKI, T., INOUE, T., KATO, R., OMIZU, M. (2020). Prostate cancer detection rate and Gleason score in relation to prostate volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 6, 449–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/379947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020
  2. [Crossref] 2. [Internet]WHO Cancer 2018 [cited 10 Feb. 2020] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer 3. Zhang L, Yang B, Zhang H, Wang J, Wang H, Zhao X. Prostate cancer: an emerging threat to the health of aging men in Asia. Asian J Androl 2011
  3. 574–8. [Crossref] 4. Kakehi Y, Sugimoto M, Taoka R. Evidenced-based clinical practice guideline for prostate cancer (summary: Japanese Urological Association, 2016 edition). Int J Urol 2017
  4. [Crossref] 5. Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2013
  5. [Crossref] 6. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2017
  6. [Crossref] 7. Serefoglu EC, Altinova S, Ugras NS, Akincioglu E, Asil E, Balbay MD. How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2013
  7. e293-8. [Crossref] 8. Ung JO, San Francisco IF, Regan MM, DeWolf WC, Olumi AF. The relationship of prostate gland volume to extended needle biopsy on prostate cancer detection. J Urol 2003
  8. [Crossref] 9. Demura T, Takada T, Shimoda N, Hioka T, Iwaguchi Y, Ichihara S, et al. Mechanism underlying the negative effect of prostate volume on the outcome of extensive transperineal ultrasound- guided template prostate biopsy. Cancer Med 2018
  9. [Crossref] 10. Al-Khalil S, Ibilibor C, Cammack JT, de Riese W. Association of prostate volume with incidence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Res Rep Urol 2016
  10. [Crossref] 11. de Gorski A, Rouprêt M, Peyronnet B, Le Cossec C, Granger B, Comperat E, et al. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies to Diagnose Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Enlarged Compared to Smaller Prostates. J Urol 2015
  11. [Crossref] 12. Diaz AM, Hoang AN, Turkbey B, Hong CW, Truong H, Sterling T, et al. Can Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improve Cancer Detection in Enlarged Prostates? J Urol 2013
  12. [Crossref] 13. Giganti F, Moore CM. A critical comparison of techniques for MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate. Transl Androl Urol 2017
  13. [Crossref] 14. Filson CP, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Huang J, Lieu P