Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2015 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4

Analysis of the correlation between sperm DNA integrity and conventional semen parameters in infertile men

Pages
191–197
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference with the normal individuals was statistically significant (p<0.001).Conclusion: In light of the comet assay results, higher degree of sperm DNA damage is associated with significant impairment of all seminal parameters

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: A male factor is responsible in approximately 30-40% of couples receiving infertility treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Generally, the analysis of sperm DNA damage, shown to have a significant clinical importance by many studies, is recognized as an advanced test that is not included in routine infertility tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference with the normal individuals was statistically significant (p<0.001).Conclusion: In light of the comet assay results, higher degree of sperm DNA damage is associated with significant impairment of all seminal parameters
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: A male factor is responsible in approximately 30-40% of couples receiving infertility treatment. Routinely, such couples undergo semen analysis including parameters such as sperm count, motility and morphology. Generally, the analysis of sperm DNA damage, shown to have a significant clinical importance by many studies, is recognized as an advanced test that is not included in routine infertility tests. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection method, commonly employed in the current infertility treatment protocols, lowers the fertilization rate, however, fertilization can occur even with a damaged DNA which is known to pose a risk in the subsequent pregnancy period. The relation between sperm morphology and the degree of sperm DNA damage has not yet been understood clearly. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between routine semen analysis and sperm DNA integrity assay, another advanced but costly method. Material and methods: The degree of DNA damage was compared with the results of semen analysis, based on the WHO criteria, in 399 male patients who received comet assay for sperm DNA integrity. The statistical correlation analyses were performed with Windows SPPS statistical package program. Results: Accordingly, the sperm DNA damage was found to be correlated with all 3 parameters (sperm count, forward motility, and morphology) examined by the semen analysis (p<0.001). Total sperm DNA Damage Count was 226, 216, and 210 arbitrary units in patients with a sperm count <15 mil/mL, forward moving motility <32%, and normal morphology <4%, respectively. The difference with the normal individuals was statistically significant (p<0.001).Conclusion: In light of the comet assay results, higher degree of sperm DNA damage is associated with significant impairment of all seminal parameters

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOS, O. S., YÜKSELTEN, Y., KAPLAN, F., SUNGUROĞLU, A., AYDOS, K. (2015). Analysis of the correlation between sperm DNA integrity and conventional semen parameters in infertile men. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4, 191–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/379758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Zini A, Bielecki R, Phang D, Zenzes MT. Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 2001;75:674-7. [CrossRef] 2. Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1039-49. [CrossRef] 3. Spano M, Bonde JP, Hjollund HI, Kolstad HA, Cordelli E, Leter G. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish first pregnancy planner study team. Fertil Steril 2000;73:43-50. 4. Host E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S. The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 200l;79:559-63. [CrossRef] 5. Lopes SM, Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Meriano JB, Casper RF. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor-quality semen samples and correlates with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1998;69:528-32. [CrossRef] 6. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. J Exp Zool 1999;284:696-704. [CrossRef] 7. Singh NP. Microgel electrophoresis of DNA. In: Technologies for Detection of DNA Damage and Mutations. New York: Plenum Press; 1996. p.3-24. [CrossRef] 8. Jaloszynski P, Kujawski M, Czub-Swierczek M, Markowska J, Szyfter K. Bleomycin- induced DNA damage and its removal in lymphocytes of breast cancer patients studied by comet assay. Mutat Res 1997;385:223-33. [CrossRef] 9. Aitken RJ, Curry BJ. Redox regulation of human sperm function: from the physiological control of sperm capacitation to the etiology of infertility and DNA damage in the germ line. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;14:367-81. [CrossRef] 10. Acharyya S, Kanjilal S, Bhattacharyya AK. Does human sperm nuclear DNA integrity affect embryo quality? Indian J Exp Biol 2005;43:1016-22. 11. Wyrobek AJ, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, Tiemann-Boege I, Jabs EW, et al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:9601-6. [CrossRef] 12. Evgeni E, Lymberopoulos G, Gazouli M, Asimakopoulos B. Conventional semen parameters and DNA fragmentation in relation to fertility status in a Greek population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;188:17-23. [CrossRef] 13. Said TM, Paasch U, Glander HJ, Agarwal A. Role of caspases in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10