Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2015 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

Radikal retropubik prostatektomi'de dorsal ven kompleksinin üretradan parmakla künt diseksiyon ile ayrılması

Seperation of dorsal vein complex from the urethra by blunt finger dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy

Pages
108–111
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to our initial experience, this technique seems to provide these aims.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We present our initial experience on the isolation of dorsal vein complex by blunt finger dissection in 26 patients with localised prostate cancer who underwent open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Loss of blood was between 300 and 500 mL (mean 350 mL).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to our initial experience, this technique seems to provide these aims.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We present our initial experience on the isolation of dorsal vein complex by blunt finger dissection in 26 patients with localised prostate cancer who underwent open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Loss of blood was between 300 and 500 mL (mean 350 mL). Two of 26 patients (7.6%) required blood transfusion. There was no positive surgical margin at prostatic apex in the patients. Twenty four of our patients (92.4%) were continent on the 3rd month. Control of dorsal vein complex is very important to decrease blood loss and to improve intraoperative exposure of retropubic area in order to get negative margin of prostatic apex and to provide the urethra long enough for a nice urethrovesical anastomosis. According to our initial experience, this technique seems to provide these aims.

Özet

Lokalize prostat kanseri nedeniyle açık radikal retropubik prostatektomi yapılmış 26 hastada dorsal ven kompleksinin künt parmak diseksiyonu ile üretradan ayrılması ile ilgili ilk deneyimlerimizi sunuyoruz. Kan kaybı 300 mL ile 500 mL arasında idi (ortalama 350 mL). İki (%7,6) hastaya kan transfüzyonu yapıldı. Has- talarda prostatik apekste pozitif cerrahi sınır saptanmadı. Üçüncü ay kontrolünde 24 hasta (%92,4) kontinan idi. Dorsal ven kompleksinin kontrolü; kan kaybını azaltmak, operasyon esnasında prostatik apekste nega- tif cerrahi sınır sağlamak amacı ile retropubik alanı daha iyi ortaya koymak ve düzgün bir üretrovezikal anastomoz için yeterli uzunlukta üretra bırakmak açısından oldukça önemlidir. İlk tecrübelerimize göre, bu tekniğin bahsedilen amaçları sağladığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAN, A., TUNCEL, A., BALCI, M., KÖSEOĞLU, E., POLAT, F., YEŞİL, S. (2015). Radikal retropubik prostatektomi'de dorsal ven kompleksinin üretradan parmakla künt diseksiyon ile ayrılması. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 108–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/379757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Lynch DF and Schellhammer PF. Techniques for management of the dorsal venous complex in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Atlas of Urologic Clinics of North America 1994;2:81-94
  2. Namiki K, Kasraeian A, Yacoub S, Rosser CJ. Blunt apical dissec- tion during anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. BMC Res Notes 2009;6:2-20. [CrossRef] 3. Goad JR and Scardino PT. Modifications in the technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy to minimize blood loss. Atlas of Urologic Clinincs of North America 1994;2:65-80
  3. Zincke H, Oesterling JE, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Barrett DM. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatec- tomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol 1994;152:1850-7
  4. Maffezzini M, Seveso M, Taverna G, Guisti G, Benetti A, Graziotti P. Evaluation of complications and results in a contem- porary series of 300 consecutive radical retropubic prostatecto- mies with the anatomic approach at a single institution. Urology 2003;61:982-6. [CrossRef] 6. Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Palisaar J, Noldus J, Salvador F, et al. Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 2003;43:113-8. [CrossRef] 7. Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Wei DC, Waserman ES, Heinze SBJ, Scardino PT, et al. Blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship to morphologic features on pre- operative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 2002;59:884-8. [CrossRef] 8. Cristini C, Di Pierro GB, Leonardo C, De Nunzio C, Franco G. Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retro- pubic prostatectomy. BMC Urol 2013;13:13.[CrossRef]