Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2015 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes in atrophic and hydronephrotic kidneys

Pages
181–184
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Any serious complication (except for bleeding) and mortality were not encountered in both groups.Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique that can be used in atrophic and hydronephrotic non-functioning kidneys

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the results of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with atrophic and hydronephrotic kidneys.Material and methods: Clinical data were collected from 35 patients who had undergone laparoscopic nephrectomies for atrophic or hydronephrotic non-functioning kidneys between January 2010 and March 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Comparative analysis was carried out between the two groups examining demographic characteristics, imaging modalities, etiology, operative times, port numbers, conversion to open surgery, complications, preand post-operative hemoglobin and creatinine values, transfusion rates and length of hospital stays.Results: Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed for atrophic kidneys in 20 (57%) patients and for hydronephrotic kidneys in 15 (42%) patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Any serious complication (except for bleeding) and mortality were not encountered in both groups.Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique that can be used in atrophic and hydronephrotic non-functioning kidneys
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare the results of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with atrophic and hydronephrotic kidneys.Material and methods: Clinical data were collected from 35 patients who had undergone laparoscopic nephrectomies for atrophic or hydronephrotic non-functioning kidneys between January 2010 and March 2014. Comparative analysis was carried out between the two groups examining demographic characteristics, imaging modalities, etiology, operative times, port numbers, conversion to open surgery, complications, preand post-operative hemoglobin and creatinine values, transfusion rates and length of hospital stays.Results: Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed for atrophic kidneys in 20 (57%) patients and for hydronephrotic kidneys in 15 (42%) patients. In the atrophic group, 3 patients (15%) required transfusion because of bleeding but none of the patients required conversion to open surgery. In the hydronephrotic group one patient (6.6%) required transfusion and conversion to open surgery because of bleeding. Both of the groups were similar in terms of postoperative hospital stay but compared to the atrophic kidneys, hydronephrotic ones were associated with a longer total operative times (90.1 min vs. 73.6 min, p=0.03). Any serious complication (except for bleeding) and mortality were not encountered in both groups.Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique that can be used in atrophic and hydronephrotic non-functioning kidneys

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLPINAR, M. T., AKÇAY, M., SANCAK, E. B., AKBAŞ, A., TEPELER, A., REŞORLU, B., ARMAĞAN, A. (2015). Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes in atrophic and hydronephrotic kidneys. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4, 181–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/379742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1991;146:278-82
  2. Rozenberg H, Bruyere F, Abdelkader T, Husset A, Hamoura H. Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Prog Urol 1999;9:1034-8
  3. Hemal AK, Talwar M, Wadhwa SN, Gupta NP. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign diseases of the kidney. Prospective nonrandomized comparison with open surgical nephrectomy. J Endourol 1999;13:425-31. [CrossRef] 4. Kural AR, Demirkesen O, Akpınar H, Tüfek İ, Yalçın V, Özkan B. Laparoskopik nefrektomide başlangıç deneyimlerimiz. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2004;30:414-21
  4. Hemal AK, Gupta NP, Wadhwa SN, Goel A, Kumar R. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: a single-center experience. Urology 2001;57:644-9. [CrossRef] 6. Hsu TH, Sung GT, Gill IS. Retroperitoneoscopic approach to nephrectomy. J Endourol 1999;13:713-8. [CrossRef] 7. Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Weber M, Janetschek G, Fahlenkamp D, Henkel T, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: The experience of the laparoscopic working group of the German Urologic Association. J Urol 1998;160:18-21. [CrossRef] 8. Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Gill IS, Wilson BS, Chandhoke PS, et al. Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology 1995;43:607-13. [CrossRef] 9. Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P. Nephrectomy: a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 1998;33:489-96. [CrossRef] 10. Keeley FX, Tolley DA. A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factor for complications. Br J Urol 1998;82:615-8. [CrossRef] 11. Gill IS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:343-60. [CrossRef] 12. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Ehrlich R, Evans R, Fuchs G, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: A multi-institutional review. J Urol 1995;154:479-83. [CrossRef] 13. Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: Experience with 2407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol 1999;162:765-70. [CrossRef] 14. Hassan HM. A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971;110:886-7
  5. Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, Henkel TO, Alken P. Retroperitoneoscopy: experience w