Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2016 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of two different doses of lidocaine on the pain sensation during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

Pages
145–149
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further large-scale randomized control studies are needed to validate these finding

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare two different doses of lidocaine used for periprostatic nerve block on pain perception during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy.Material and methods: A total of 288 patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or abnormal digital rectal examination who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n=103) prostate biopsy were performed after administering perianal intrarectal application of 10 mL 2% lidocaine gel, Group 2 (n=98) 2 mL of 2% lidocaine injection on each side following rectal installation of lidocaine gel and Group 3 (n=87) 4 mL of 2% lidocaine injection on each side after rectal instillation of lidocaine gel.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further large-scale randomized control studies are needed to validate these finding
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare two different doses of lidocaine used for periprostatic nerve block on pain perception during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy.Material and methods: A total of 288 patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or abnormal digital rectal examination who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were included in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n=103) prostate biopsy were performed after administering perianal intrarectal application of 10 mL 2% lidocaine gel, Group 2 (n=98) 2 mL of 2% lidocaine injection on each side following rectal installation of lidocaine gel and Group 3 (n=87) 4 mL of 2% lidocaine injection on each side after rectal instillation of lidocaine gel. Patients’ pain scores during biopsy procedure were reported using visual analogue score (VAS). Independent sample t test, ANOVA test and Tukey test were used for statistical evaluation.Results: The mean age, prostate volume and PSA level were 65.6±8.4 years, 58.2±34.8 mL, and 11.8±3.4 ng/mL respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The mean VAS scores were 2.4±1.8 in Group 1, 2.5±1.9 in Group 2 and 1.6±1.6 in Group 3. Patients in Group 3, reported significant pain reduction compared with patients in Groups 1 and 2 (p=0.002, and 0.001, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores between Groups 1 and 2 (p=0.815).Conclusion: According to our results we recommend the use of perianal intrarectal lidocain gel application, and periprostatic nerve block with injection of 4 ml 2% lidocaine per side combination in TRUS-guided prostate biopsies. Further large-scale randomized control studies are needed to validate these finding

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, F., DURSUN, F., MALKOÇ, E., YILMAZ, Ö., SOYDAN, H., ŞEN, H., BAŞAL, Ş., ZEKEY, F., KARADEMİR, K. (2016). Comparison of two different doses of lidocaine on the pain sensation during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 145–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/379728

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Mottet N, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, van Casteren NJ, et al. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Eur Assoc Urol 2014
  2. Halpern EJ, Strup SE. Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:623-7. [CrossRef] 3. Bingqian L, Peihuan L, Yudong W, Jinxing W, Zhiyong W. Intraprostatic local anesthesia withperiprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2009;182:479-83. [CrossRef] 4. Moinzadeh A, Mourtzinos A, Triaca V, Hamawy KJ. A randomized double-blind prospective study evaluating patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate using prebiopsy rofecoxib. Urology 2003;62:1054-7. [CrossRef] 5. Peyromaure M, Ravery V, Messas A, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L. Pain and morbidity of an extensive prostate 10-biopsy protocol: a prospective study in 289 patients. J Urol 2002;167:218-21. [CrossRef] 6. Bjurlin MA, Wysock JS, Taneja SS. Optimization of prostate biopsy: review of technique and complications. Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:299-313. [CrossRef] 7. Giannarini G, Autorino R, Valent F, Mogorovich A, Manassero F, De Maria M, et al. Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaineprilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2009;181:585-91. [CrossRef] 8. Maccagnano C, Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Raber M, Angiolilli D, Montorsi F, et al. Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: which is the most effective technique? Urol Int 2011;87:1-13. [CrossRef] 9. Luscombe CJ, Cooke PW. Pain during prostate biopsy. Lancet 2004;363:1840-1. [CrossRef] 10. Cantiello F, Imperatore V, Iannuzzo M, Scibelli G, Di Meo S, Fusco F, et al. Periprostatic nerve block (PNB) alone vs PNB combined with an anaesthetic-myorelaxant agent cream for prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized double-arm study. BJU Int 2009;103:1195-8. [CrossRef] 11. Raber M, Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Dehò F, Briganti A, Salonia A, et al. Topical prilocaine-lidocaine cream combined with peripheral nerve block improves pain control in prostatic biopsy: results from a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 2008;53:967-73. [CrossRef] 12. Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Siegel YI, Lindner A. The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2001;165:445-54. [CrossRef] 13. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudh