Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2016 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Robotic kidney transplantation: The Bakırköy experience

Pages
295–298
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lymphocele which is one of the most frequently encountered complications was not observed in our series.Conclusion: We think that using a minimally invasive approach greater number of patients will be able to benefit from this treatment modality, and this important health issue may decrease significantly

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Robotic kidney transplantation, first described by Hoznek and colleagues, and has been improved by investigators like Oberholzer and Menon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We realized the first robotic kidney transplant (RKT) in our clinic in December 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lymphocele which is one of the most frequently encountered complications was not observed in our series.Conclusion: We think that using a minimally invasive approach greater number of patients will be able to benefit from this treatment modality, and this important health issue may decrease significantly
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Robotic kidney transplantation, first described by Hoznek and colleagues, and has been improved by investigators like Oberholzer and Menon. We realized the first robotic kidney transplant (RKT) in our clinic in December 2015. In this study, we aimed to present the first 15 cases we performed within 3 months.Materıal and methods: Starting from January 2016, we performed 15 RKTs in our hospital. Before surgery, the whole robotic procedure was thoroughly explained to the patients and their informed consents were taken. Results: We performed RKT in 7 male and 8 female patients. Mean patient age was 37.4±10.8 years. Mean body mass index of the patients was 22.6±3.35 kg/m². Mean preoperative creatinine and hemoglobin levels were 6.14±2.12 mg/dL and 10.04±1.64 g/dL, respectively. Mean operative time was 300.3±104.2 minutes. Mean warm ischemia and re-warming times were 1.9±0.54 minutes and 73.3±30.7 minutes, respectively. We did not need any necessity to switch to open surgery, and any intraoperative complication did not develop in any patient. Lymphocele which is one of the most frequently encountered complications was not observed in our series.Conclusion: We think that using a minimally invasive approach greater number of patients will be able to benefit from this treatment modality, and this important health issue may decrease significantly

🔖

Cite This Article

TUĞCU, V., ŞENER, N. C., ŞAHİN, S., YAVUZSAN, A. H., AKBAY, F. G., APAYDIN, S. (2016). Robotic kidney transplantation: The Bakırköy experience. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 295–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/379725

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Rassweiler J, Rassweiler MC, Kenngott H, Frede T, Michel MS, Alken P, et al. The past, present and future of minimally invasive therapy in urology: a review and speculative outlook. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2013;22:200-9. [CrossRef] 2. Sood A, McCulloch P, Dahm P, Ahlawat R, Jeong W, Bhandari M, et al. Ontogeny of a surgical technique: Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia. Int J Surg 2016;25:158-61. [CrossRef] 3. Garcia-Roca R, Garcia-Aroz S, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H, Oberholzer J, Benedetti E. Single Center Experience With Robotic Kidney Transplantation for Recipients With BMI of 40 kg/m2 Or Greater: A Comparison With the UNOS Registry. Transplantation 2016 May 5; DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001249 [CrossRef] 4. Hoznek A, Zaki SK, Samadi DB, Salomon L, Lobontiu A, Lang P, et al. Robotic assisted kidney transplantation: an initial experience. J Urol 2002;167:1604-6. [CrossRef] 5. Oberholzer J, Giulianotti P, Danielson KK, Spaggiari M, BejaranoPineda L, Bianco F, et al. Minimally invasive robotic kidney transplantation for obese patients previously denied access to transplantation. Am J Transplant 2013;13:721-8. [CrossRef] 6. Menon M, Sood A, Bhandari M, Kher V, Ghosh P, Abaza R, et al. Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: a stepby-step description of the Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta technique (IDEAL phase 2a). Eur Urol 2014;65:991-1000. [CrossRef] 7. Sood A, Ghosh P, Menon M, Jeong W, Bhandari M, Ahlawat R. Robotic renal transplantation: Current status. J Minimal Access Surg 2015;11:35-9. [CrossRef] 8. Tzvetanov I, D’Amico G, Benedetti E. Robotic-assisted Kidney Transplantation: Our Experience and Literature Review. Curr Transplant Reports 2015;2:122-6. [CrossRef] 9. Doumerc N, Roumiguié M, Rischmann P, Sallusto F. Totally Robotic Approach with Transvaginal Insertion for Kidney Transplantation. Eur Urol 2015;68:1103-4. [CrossRef] 10. Giulianotti P, Gorodner V, Sbrana F, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H, Bianco F, et al. Robotic transabdominal kidney transplantation in a morbidly obese patient. Am J Transplant 2010;10:1478-82. [CrossRef] 11. Tsai MK, Lee CY, Yang CY, Yeh CC, Hu RH, Lai HS. Robotassisted renal transplantation in the retroperitoneum. Transpl Int 2014;27:452-7. [CrossRef] 12. Presser N, Kerr H, Gao T, Begala M, Paschal S, Shoskes DA, et al. Fibrin Glue Injections: A Minimally Invasive and Cost-Effective Treatment for Post-Renal Transplant Lymphoceles and Lymph Fistulas. Am J Transplant 2016;16:694-9. [C