Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2018 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed with sperm retrieved by microscopic testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic patients

Pages
462–466
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the presenceof motile sperm, live birth rates are similar between OA and NOA case with very low complication rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The absence of any sperm in the ejaculate is called azoospermia and it is detected in 1% ofmales and 10-15% of those with infertility complaints.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we examined the sperm retrieval rates with m-TESE in azoospermicpatients, the results of ICSI in OA and NOA patients with sperm and the underlying testicular pathologiesin patients without sperm.Material and methods: Patients who underwent m-TESE at IVF unit of our hospital between January 2005and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the presenceof motile sperm, live birth rates are similar between OA and NOA case with very low complication rates.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The absence of any sperm in the ejaculate is called azoospermia and it is detected in 1% ofmales and 10-15% of those with infertility complaints. Azoospermia may be due to obstructive (OA) andnon-obstructive (NOA) causes. Today, healthy pregnancies can be achieved in azoospermic patients by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) performed using sperm retrieved from microscopic testicular spermextraction (m-TESE). In this study, we examined the sperm retrieval rates with m-TESE in azoospermicpatients, the results of ICSI in OA and NOA patients with sperm and the underlying testicular pathologiesin patients without sperm.Material and methods: Patients who underwent m-TESE at IVF unit of our hospital between January 2005and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 342 azoospermic patients (117 OA and 225 NOAcases) with regular follow-up were included in the study. In these cases, sperm retrieval and clinical pregnancy rates after ICSI were compared.Results: In the m-TESE procedure, motile sperm was found in all of the OA patients and in 52.4% (118/225)of the NOA patients. Clinical pregnancy rate in the OA group was 29.9% (35/117) and live birth rate was25.6% (30/117). In the NOA group, the clinical pregnancy rate was 27.1% (32/118) and the live birth ratewas 23.7% (27/118). Histopathologic evaluation was made in 107 cases in the NOA group with no testicularsperm, revealing that 59 cases with germ-cell aplasia (sertoli-cell only syndrome), 42 cases with maturationarrest, and 6 cases with hypospermatogenesis. Postoperative hematoma developed in 3 of m-TESE cases andsubsided with conservative treatment.Conclusion: If motile sperm is retrieved with m-TESE application in azoospermic patients, pregnancyresulting in one live birth in about 4 couples who undergo ICSI application can be achieved. In the presenceof motile sperm, live birth rates are similar between OA and NOA case with very low complication rates.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, E., KARACAN, M., ÇEBİ, Z., ULUĞ, M., ARVAS, A., ÇAMLIBEL, T. (2018). Results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed with sperm retrieved by microscopic testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic patients. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 462–466. https://ajindex.com/articles/379702

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Willott GM. Frequency of azoospermia. Forensic Sci Int 1982;20:9-13. [CrossRef] Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 1989;142:62-7. [CrossRef] Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of a single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17-8. [CrossRef] Amer M, Haggar SE, Moustafa T, Abd El-Naser T, Zohdy W. Testicular sperm extraction: impact of testicular histology on outcome, number of biopsies to be performed and optimal time for repetition. Hum Reprod 1999;14:3030-4.5. Schlegel PN, Su LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1688-92. [CrossRef] Takada S, Tsujimura A, Ueda T. Matsuoka Y, Takao T, Miyagawa Y, et al. Androgen decline in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 2008;72:114-8. [CrossRef] Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999;14:131-5. [CrossRef] Ramasamy R, Padilla WO, Osterberg EC, Srivastava A, Reifsnyder JE, Niederberger C, et al. A comparison of models for predicting sperm retrieval before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2013;189:638-42. [CrossRef] Bonarriba CR, Burgués JP, Vidana V, Ruiz X, Pizá P. Predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval in azoospermia. Actas Urol Esp 2013;37:266-72. [CrossRef] Vloeberghs V, Verheyen G, Haentjens P, Goossens A, Polyzos NP, Tournaye H. How successful in TESE-ICSI in couples with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 2015;30:1790-6. [CrossRef] Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2015;104:1099-103. [CrossRef] Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:539-49. [CrossRef] Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Orosz JE, Agarwal A. An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic male. Clinics 2013;68:99-110. [CrossRef] Tezer M, Küçükdurmaz F, Kadıoğlu A. mikroTESE. Türkiye Klinikleri J Uroloji-Special Topics 2008;1:91-7.
  2. Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, Zohdy W. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional te