Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2020 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Single-incision midurethral sling shows less pain and similar success rate in a short-term follow-up compared to the transobturator tape method in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Pages
63–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the questionnaire scores of the IIQ-7 and UDI-6 were also significantly im-proved at postoperative evaluations (p<0.001), there was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion: SIMS is associated with a significantly improved postoperative pain profile and earlier return to work when compared to MUS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the efficacy, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction rates in women treated for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using the adjustable anchored single-incision midurethral sling (SIMS) and standard midurethral sling (MUS) procedures.Material and methods: A total of 113 women between October 2012 and October 2016 underwent either the adjustable SIMS (n=54) or MUS (n=57) procedure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The postoperative pain profile was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale at the fixed time-point quality of life and an additional postoperative 3rd week appointment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the questionnaire scores of the IIQ-7 and UDI-6 were also significantly im-proved at postoperative evaluations (p<0.001), there was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion: SIMS is associated with a significantly improved postoperative pain profile and earlier return to work when compared to MUS.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare the efficacy, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction rates in women treated for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using the adjustable anchored single-incision midurethral sling (SIMS) and standard midurethral sling (MUS) procedures.Material and methods: A total of 113 women between October 2012 and October 2016 underwent either the adjustable SIMS (n=54) or MUS (n=57) procedure. The postoperative pain profile was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale at the fixed time-point quality of life and an additional postoperative 3rd week appointment. We asked our patients the following two questions to evaluate their satisfaction with surgery and their preference: “Would you have this kind of surgery again?” (Q1), and “Would you recommend this type of surgery to another patient with same symptoms?” (Q2). For the evaluation of patient complaints, the Incontinence Impact Question-naire (IIQ-7) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) were used before and after the procedure.Results: Women in the SIMS group had a significantly lower postoperative pain profile for up to 3 weeks (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in perioperative complications and postoperative continence rates between the groups. With regard to Q1 and Q2, a significant difference was found between the groups (p=0.003 and p=0.002, respectively). While the questionnaire scores of the IIQ-7 and UDI-6 were also significantly im-proved at postoperative evaluations (p<0.001), there was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion: SIMS is associated with a significantly improved postoperative pain profile and earlier return to work when compared to MUS.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKEÇİ, A., EFTAL, T. C., GÖLBAŞI, C., KELEŞ, A., ONUR, R. (2020). Single-incision midurethral sling shows less pain and similar success rate in a short-term follow-up compared to the transobturator tape method in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 63–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/379601

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M. The standardization of terminology of low-er urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167. [CrossRef] 2. Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD, Chapple CR, Costantini E, Ficarra V, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2010;58:218-38. [CrossRef] 3. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Artibani W, Novara G, Cardozo L, et al. Surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence: what is the gold-standard procedure? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:619-21. [CrossRef] 4. Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, Patel M, White AB, Ore-juela FJ, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gyne-col 2014;211:71.e1-71.e27. [CrossRef] 5. Daneshgari F, Kong W, Swartz M. Complications of mid ure-thral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials. J Urol 2008;180:1890-7. [CrossRef] 6. Schellart RP, Oude Rengerink K, Van der Aa F, Lucot JP, Kimpe B, de Ridder DJ, et al. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up. Eur Urol 2014;66:1179-85. [CrossRef] 7. Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive pro-cedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 2001;11:1306-13. 8. Grigoriadis C, Bakas P, Derpapas A, Creatsa M, Liapis A. Tension-free vaginal tape obturator versus Ajust adjustable single incision sling procedure in women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;170:563-6. [CrossRef] 9. Schellart RP, Casteleijn FM, Dijkgraaf MGW, Tutolo M, Roovers JWR. Are patients willing to trade cure rate against less pain? Patients’ preferences for single incision midurethral sling or transobturator standard midurethral sling. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:1187-93. [CrossRef] 10. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Cam M, Karateke A. Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:129-33. [CrossRef] 11. Ulmsten U, Petros P. Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1995;29:75-82. [CrossRe