Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2020 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in kidneys with multiple renal arteries versus a single renal artery: An analysis of vascular complications from 1,350 cases

Pages
314–319
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The renovascular complication rate and overall conversion rate to open surgery were significantly higher in donors with MRAs (p<0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has been shown to be a safe approach with better morbidity results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: Patients who underwent hand-assisted LDNs between January 2007 and February 2018 were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The renovascular complication rate and overall conversion rate to open surgery were significantly higher in donors with MRAs (p<0.05).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has been shown to be a safe approach with better morbidity results. Impact of multiple renal arteries (MRAs) and anatomical variations has been reviewed by many authors. In our study, the relationship between the donors with MRAs and risk of perioperative vascular complications related to donor nephrectomy was investigated. Material and methods: Patients who underwent hand-assisted LDNs between January 2007 and February 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, side of donor nephrectomies, donors with MRAs, intraoperative vascular complications, conversion rates, hospitalization durations, and operative times were extracted. Risk factors for perioperative vascular complications were defined. Results: There were MRAs in 288 kidney donors (21.3%). The number of patients who underwent a right donor nephrectomy was 113 (8.4%). BMI, waist circumference, and postoperative hospital stay were not significantly different between donors with one artery and those with MRAs (p>0.05). The renovascular complication rate and overall conversion rate to open surgery were significantly higher in donors with MRAs (p<0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative safety of the kidney donors is of crucial importance. Surgeons performing LDNs must be aware of the potential risks. Our analysis suggests that procurement of kidneys from donors with MRAs is a risk factor for renovascular complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARPALI, E., KARATAŞ, C., AKYOLLU, B., YAPRAK, D., GÜNAYDIN, B., KOÇAK, B. (2020). Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in kidneys with multiple renal arteries versus a single renal artery: An analysis of vascular complications from 1,350 cases. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4, 314–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/379599

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995;60:1047-9.
  2. Wilson CH, Sanni A, Rix DA, Soomro NA. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011: CD006124. [CrossRef] Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, et al., Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008;247:58-70. [CrossRef] Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar JP, Wolfe BM, Perez RV. Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Arch Surg 2001;136:897-907. [CrossRef] Broudeur L, Karam G, Chelghaf I, De Vergie S, Rigaud J, Perrouin Verbe MA, et al. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in case of right kidney and multiple-renal artery kidney: a systematic review of the literature. World J Urol 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02821-8. [CrossRef] Kwapisz M, Kieszek R, Bieniasz M, Jedrzejko K, Nita M, Sulkowska K, et al., Do Anatomical Anomalies Affect the Results of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation? Transplant Proc 2018;50:1669-73. [CrossRef] Hsu TH, Su L, Ratner LE, Trock BJ, Kavoussi LR. Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 2003;61:323-7. [CrossRef] Leventhal JR, Deeik RK, Joehl RJ, Rege RV, Herman CH, Fryer JP, et al., Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy--is it safe? Transplantation 2000;70:602-6. [CrossRef] Brown SL, Biehl TR, Rawlins MC, Hefty TR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach. J Urol 2001;165:766-9. [CrossRef] 10. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 2004;171:47-51. [CrossRef] 11. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, et al., Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1494-9. [CrossRef] 12. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. A review of the first 5 years. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28:709-19. [CrossRef] 13. Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE. Should the indications for laparascopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as f