Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2020 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of bupivacaine alone and in a combination with lidocaine for caudal block in patients undergoing circumcision: A historical cohort study

Pages
243–248
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, we applied the multivariable logistic regression for fentanyl consumption adjusted for first mobilization and micturition time, unlike mobilization, a significantly increased risk for postoperative delayed micturition (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0–1.12; p=0.038) was found with intra-operative intravenous fentanyl use.Conclusion: Our results suggest that the caudal block with a lidocaine+bupivacaine combination decreases rescue analgesic consumption at day–case surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Optimal analgesia following ambulatory surgery is an important matter in patient satisfaction, and it reduces unnecessary hospital admissions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigated whether a caudal block with bupivacaine alone or in a combination with lidocaine can alter postoperative pain scores, complications, and peroperative and postoperative analgesic consumption.Material and methods: This is a retrospective study that included children who underwent elective circumcision surgery under general anesthesia and caudal analgesia between January and June 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, we applied the multivariable logistic regression for fentanyl consumption adjusted for first mobilization and micturition time, unlike mobilization, a significantly increased risk for postoperative delayed micturition (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0–1.12; p=0.038) was found with intra-operative intravenous fentanyl use.Conclusion: Our results suggest that the caudal block with a lidocaine+bupivacaine combination decreases rescue analgesic consumption at day–case surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Optimal analgesia following ambulatory surgery is an important matter in patient satisfaction, and it reduces unnecessary hospital admissions. This study investigated whether a caudal block with bupivacaine alone or in a combination with lidocaine can alter postoperative pain scores, complications, and peroperative and postoperative analgesic consumption.Material and methods: This is a retrospective study that included children who underwent elective circumcision surgery under general anesthesia and caudal analgesia between January and June 2018. Among the 103 children, 17 cases were not analyzed due to an unsuccessful caudal block and procedures simultaneously underwent another operation unrelated to circumcision. We divided the study participants into two groups according to the type of local anesthetic applied: 0.5 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) and 0.5 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mg/kg 1% lidocaine (Group BL) caudally.Results: Pain scores were similar between these groups and remained in the mild-to-moderate range throughout the hospitalization (p>0.05). There were significant differences regarding the rescue analgesic use, first micturition, and mobilization times (p<0.001). In addition, we applied the multivariable logistic regression for fentanyl consumption adjusted for first mobilization and micturition time, unlike mobilization, a significantly increased risk for postoperative delayed micturition (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0–1.12; p=0.038) was found with intra-operative intravenous fentanyl use.Conclusion: Our results suggest that the caudal block with a lidocaine+bupivacaine combination decreases rescue analgesic consumption at day–case surgery. In circumcision procedures, the caudal block is an effective and safe analgesic method for intraoperative and postoperative pain control with no side effects. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrals.gov, NCT03911648.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATASEVER, A. G., ERMİŞ, O., DEMİR, B. Ş., KAŞALİ, K., KARADENİZ, M. S. (2020). Comparison of bupivacaine alone and in a combination with lidocaine for caudal block in patients undergoing circumcision: A historical cohort study. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 243–248. https://ajindex.com/articles/379593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Brennan LJ. Modern day-case anaesthesia for children. Br J Anaesth 1999
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Bosenberg A. Pediatric regional anesthesia update. Paediatr Anaesth 2004
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Samol NB, Furstein JS, Moore DL. Regional anesth and Pain Management for the Pediatric Patient. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Brislin RP, Rose JB. Pediatric acute pain management. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2005
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Corliss A, Alyssa A, Timothy J, Hamilton DA. Buffered lidocaine and bupivacaine mixture-the ideal local anesthetic solution? Plast Surg 2015
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Inomata S, Tanaka E, Miyabe M, Kakiuchi Y, Nagashima A, Yamasaki Y, et al. Plasma lidocaine concentrations during continuous thorasic epidural anesthesia after clonidine premedication in children. Anesth Analg 2001
  7. [CrossRef] 7. De Jonghe B, Cook D, Appere-De-Vecchi C, Guyatt G, Meade M, Outin H. Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2000
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Graham AC, McClure JH. Quantitative assessment of motor block in labouring women receiving epidural analgesia. Anaesthesia 2001
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Hutchinson A, Schuster T, Santamaria N, Babl FE. Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months. BMJ Open 2017
  10. e016225. [CrossRef] 10. Jöhr M. Regional anaesthesia in neonates, infants and children: an educational review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Wang C, Slikker W Jr. Strategies and experimental models for evaluating anesthetics: effects on the developing nervous system. Anesth Analg 2008
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Lönnqvist PA, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, Suresh S, Ivani G. The European society of regional anesthesia and pain therapy and the American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine joint committee practice advisory on controversial topics in pediatric regional anesthesia I and II: what do they tell us? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Aouad MT, Moussa AR, Dagher CM, Muwakkit SA, Jabbour-Khoury SI, Zbeidy RA, et al. Addition of ketamine to propofol for initiation of procedural anesthesia in children reduces propofol consumption and preserves hemodynamic stability. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Köknel