Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2020 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

The use of the three-dimensional printed segmented collapsible model of the pelvicalyceal system to improve residents’ learning curve

Pages
226–230
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The ability to select the optimal calyx for the primary and the second access became better by 60% and 55%, respectively (p<0.001).Conclusion: 3D printed segmented collapsible model of the PCS is promising for the improvement of the learning curve of residents and enables to optimize their clinical education, as well as compensate for their lack of experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the use of the three-dimensional (3D) printed segmented collapsible model of the pelvicalyceal system (PCS) to improve the learning curve of the residents.Material and methods: 3D printed models based on computed tomography (CT) images of 10 patients with a staghorn stone were developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The final stage was the printing of each separated detail.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The ability to select the optimal calyx for the primary and the second access became better by 60% and 55%, respectively (p<0.001).Conclusion: 3D printed segmented collapsible model of the PCS is promising for the improvement of the learning curve of residents and enables to optimize their clinical education, as well as compensate for their lack of experience.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the use of the three-dimensional (3D) printed segmented collapsible model of the pelvicalyceal system (PCS) to improve the learning curve of the residents.Material and methods: 3D printed models based on computed tomography (CT) images of 10 patients with a staghorn stone were developed. Used images of patients were obtained from CT scans in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format. The area of interest was extracted and saved in stereolithography format. Further, the bioengineer performed virtual segmentation corresponding to the level of each calyces group that was defined by an experienced urologist. The final stage was the printing of each separated detail. Special questionnaire for evaluating the effectiveness of 3D models during both the examination of PCS anatomy and planning percutaneous nephrolithotomy was invented.Results: The determination of the anterior and posterior calyces of the upper group was improved by 61% and 69%, the difference in the determination of the calyces of the middle group was 60% and 51%, and the answers regarding the number of the anterior and posterior calyces of the lower group became better by 67% and 74%, respectively (p<0.001). The ability to select the optimal calyx for the primary and the second access became better by 60% and 55%, respectively (p<0.001).Conclusion: 3D printed segmented collapsible model of the PCS is promising for the improvement of the learning curve of residents and enables to optimize their clinical education, as well as compensate for their lack of experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

GULİEV, B., KOMYAKOV, B., TALYSHİNSKİİ, A. (2020). The use of the three-dimensional printed segmented collapsible model of the pelvicalyceal system to improve residents’ learning curve. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 226–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/379566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Belien H, Biesmans H, Steenwerckx A, Bijnens E. Prebending of osteosynthesis plate using 3D printed models to treat symptomatic os acromiale and acromial fracture. J Exp Orthop 2017;4:34-8. [CrossRef] 2. Citak M, Kochsiek L, Gehrke T, Haasper C, Suero EM, Mau H. Preliminary results of a 3D printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects. Hip Int 2018;28:266-71. [CrossRef] 3. Archip N, Clatz O, Whalen S, Kacher D, Fedorov A, Kot A, et al. Non-rigid alignment of pre-operative MRI, fMRI, and DT-MRI with intraoperative MRI for enhanced visualization and navigation in image-guided neurosurgery. Neuroimage 2007;35:609-24. [CrossRef] 4. Ghizoni E, de Souza JP, Raposo-Amaral CE, Denadai R, de Aquino HB, Raposo-Amaral CA, et al. 3D-printed craniosynostosis model: new simulation surgical tool. World Neurosurg 2018;109:356-61. [CrossRef] 5. Turney BW. A new model with an anatomically accurate human renal collecting system for training in fluoroscopy guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy access. J Endourol 2014;28:360-3. [CrossRef] 6. Bernhard JC, Isotani S, Matsugasumi T, Duddalwar V, Hung AJ, Suer E, et al. Personalized 3D printed model of kidney and tumor anatomy: a useful tool for patient education. World J Urol 2016;34:337-45. [CrossRef] 7. Atalay H, Canat H, Ülker V, Alkan İ, Özkuvanci Ü, Altunrende F. Impact of personalized three-dimensional (3D) printed pelvicalyceal system models on patient information in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy surgery: a pilot study. Int Braz J Urol 2017;43:470-5. [CrossRef] 8. Wong NC, Hoogenes J, Guo Y, Quantz MA, Matsumoto ED. Utility of a printed bladder model for teaching minimally invasive urethrovesical anastomosis. Can Urol Assoc J 2017;11:321-2. [CrossRef] 9. Alyaev YG, Sirota ES, Bezrukov EA, Ali SK, Bukatov MD, Letunovskiy AV, et al. Non-biological 3D printed simulator for training in percutaneous nephro- lithotripsy. Urologiia 2018;1:10-4. [CrossRef] 10. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:475-82. [CrossRef] 11. Ghani KR, Andonian S, Bultitude M, Desai M, Giusti G, Okhunov Z, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: update, trends and future directions. Eur Urol 2016;70:382-96. [CrossRef] 12. Olcott EW, Sommer FG, Napel S. Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: In vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography and nephrotomography. Radiology 1997;204:19-25. [CrossRef