Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Scrotal ultrasonographic findings in obese infertile patients and their correlations to semen and hormonal profile

Pages
7–11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite having comparable testicular size detectedon scrotal ultrasound, infertile obese men had significantly lower total testicular volume to body mass indexratio and this ratio correlated positively with semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count andserum testosterone but negatively with serum follicular stimulating hormone and estradiol levels.Conclusion: We therefore conclude that the incidence of subclinical varicocele, hydrocele and testicular microlithiasis was higher in obese infertile patients and the ratio between testicular volume assessed by scrotalultrasound and body mass index may be a new parameter that correlates with subfertility status in these men.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to compare scrotal ultrasonographic findings in obeseand normal weight infertile men and correlate these findings with semen parameters and hormonalprofile.Material and methods: A total of 188 men presented for infertility evaluation were included in this study.They were divided according to body mass indices into obese (n=96) and normal weight infertile patients(n=92).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ratio between testicular size measured by scrotal ultrasound and body mass index werecalculated.Results: Any significant differences were not observed in semen parameters, serum levels of follicularstimulating hormone and testosterone between obese and normal weight infertile men (p>0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite having comparable testicular size detectedon scrotal ultrasound, infertile obese men had significantly lower total testicular volume to body mass indexratio and this ratio correlated positively with semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count andserum testosterone but negatively with serum follicular stimulating hormone and estradiol levels.Conclusion: We therefore conclude that the incidence of subclinical varicocele, hydrocele and testicular microlithiasis was higher in obese infertile patients and the ratio between testicular volume assessed by scrotalultrasound and body mass index may be a new parameter that correlates with subfertility status in these men.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to compare scrotal ultrasonographic findings in obeseand normal weight infertile men and correlate these findings with semen parameters and hormonalprofile.Material and methods: A total of 188 men presented for infertility evaluation were included in this study.They were divided according to body mass indices into obese (n=96) and normal weight infertile patients(n=92). Basic infertility evaluation, semen analysis and scrotal duplex ultrasound examination in additionto measurement of serum levels of follicular stimulating hormone, testosterone and estradiol were donefor all cases. The ratio between testicular size measured by scrotal ultrasound and body mass index werecalculated.Results: Any significant differences were not observed in semen parameters, serum levels of follicularstimulating hormone and testosterone between obese and normal weight infertile men (p>0.05). Serumestradiol level was significantly higher in obese than normal weight infertile men (p<0.001). There is significant increase in subclinical varicocele, hydrocele and testicular microlithiasis detected by scrotal ultrasoundin obese infertile men than nonobese patients (p<0.05). Despite having comparable testicular size detectedon scrotal ultrasound, infertile obese men had significantly lower total testicular volume to body mass indexratio and this ratio correlated positively with semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count andserum testosterone but negatively with serum follicular stimulating hormone and estradiol levels.Conclusion: We therefore conclude that the incidence of subclinical varicocele, hydrocele and testicular microlithiasis was higher in obese infertile patients and the ratio between testicular volume assessed by scrotalultrasound and body mass index may be a new parameter that correlates with subfertility status in these men.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAHA, E. A., ALGAHLAN, H. A. A., ZIDAN, M., ABDELHAFEZ, A., FARAG, F. F. (2019). Scrotal ultrasonographic findings in obese infertile patients and their correlations to semen and hormonal profile. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 7–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/379550

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Cabler S, Agarwal A, Flint M, Du Plessis SS. Obesity: modern man’s fertility nemesis. Asian J Androl 2010;12:480-9. [CrossRef] Booth ML, Hunter C, Gore CJ, Bauman A, Owen N. The relationship between body mass index and waist circumference: implications for estimates of the population prevalence of overweight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:1058-61. [CrossRef] Magnusdottir EV, Thorsteinsson T, Thorsteinsdottir S, Heimisdottir M, Olafsdottir K. Persistent organochlorines, sedentary occupation, obesity and human male sub fertility. Hum Reprod 2005;20:208-15. [CrossRef] Katib A. Mechanisms linking obesity to male infertility. Cent European J Urol 2015;68:79-85. [CrossRef] Tsai EC, Matsumoto AM, Fujimoto WY, Boyko EJ. Association of bioavailable, free, and total T with insulin resistance, influence of sex hormone-binding globulin and body fat. Diabetes Care 2004;27:861-8. [CrossRef] Kort HI, Massey JB, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, Shapiro DB, Witt MA, Roudebush WE. Impact of body mass index values on sperm quantity and quality. J Androl 2006;27:450-2. [CrossRef] MacDonald AA, Herbison GP, Showell M, Farquhar CM. The impact of body mass index on semen parameters and reproductive hormones in human males: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:293-311. [CrossRef] Sermondade N, Faure C, Fezeu L, Shayeb AG, Bonde JP, Jensen TK, et al. BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:221-31. [CrossRef] Pierik FH, Dohle GR, van Muiswinkel JM, Vreeburg JT, Weber RF. Is routine scrotal ultrasound advantageous in infertile men? J Urol 1999;162:1618-20.
  2. Moon MH, Kim SH, Cho JY, Seo JT, Chun YK. Scrotal US for evaluation of infertile men with azoospermia. Radiology 2006;239:168-73. [CrossRef] Abdulwahed SR, Mohamed EE, Taha EA, Saleh MA, Abdelsalam YM, ElGanainy EO. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in predicting etiology of azoosperm. Urology 2013;81:967-71. [CrossRef] Walters RC, Marguet CG, Crain DS. Lower prevalence of varicoceles in obese patients found on routine scrotal ultrasound. J Urol 2012;187:599-601. [CrossRef] Paltiel HJ, Diamond DA, Di Canzio J, Zurakowski D, Borer JG, Atala A. Testicular volume: comparison of orchidometer and US measurements in dogs. Radiology 2002;222:114-9. [CrossRef] Sakamoto H, Ogawa Y, Yoshida H. Relationship between testicular volume and testicular function: comparison of the Prader orchidometric and ultrasonographic me