Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the results of dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty

Pages
223–229
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Three patients who were found to have a decline inthe maximum voiding rate in the postoperative 3rd month were included in the dilation program.Conclusion: Single-stage dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty is a surgical option to beused in the treatment of long segment urethral strictures with high success and low complication rates inexperienced hands.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Evaluation of the results of dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty in patientswith a long- segment urethral strictures.Material and methods: Twenty male patients who underwent urethroplasty in our clinic between November 2015 and January 2017 were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were followed-up at 2nd-3rd weeks, 3rdand 6th months after the operation.Results: Mean age of the patients was 59.45±13.6 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Three patients who were found to have a decline inthe maximum voiding rate in the postoperative 3rd month were included in the dilation program.Conclusion: Single-stage dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty is a surgical option to beused in the treatment of long segment urethral strictures with high success and low complication rates inexperienced hands.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Evaluation of the results of dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty in patientswith a long- segment urethral strictures.Material and methods: Twenty male patients who underwent urethroplasty in our clinic between November 2015 and January 2017 were evaluated. The outcomes of single-stage dorsolateral buccal mucosalaugmentation urethroplasty were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were followed-up at 2nd-3rd weeks, 3rdand 6th months after the operation.Results: Mean age of the patients was 59.45±13.6 years. Mean length of the strictures was 4.59±1.99 cm(3-11 cm) and mean length of buccal mucosal graft was 6.8±1.98 cm (5-13 cm). Mean duration of operationwas 149.25±47.39 minutes (95-270 min) and mean blood loss was calculated as 165.5±63.05 mL (75-280mL). The success rate of dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty was calculated as 85%after a mean follow-up of 7.38±2.6 months. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications inthe urethroplasty region or the mouth except one patient. Three patients who were found to have a decline inthe maximum voiding rate in the postoperative 3rd month were included in the dilation program.Conclusion: Single-stage dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty is a surgical option to beused in the treatment of long segment urethral strictures with high success and low complication rates inexperienced hands.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, A., YENİCE, M. G., ŞEKER, K. G., ARIKAN, Y., ÇOLAKOĞLU, Y., ŞAM, E., TUĞCU, V. (2019). Evaluation of the results of dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 223–229. https://ajindex.com/articles/379549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Zimmerman WB, Santucci RA. Buccal mucosa urethroplasty for adult urethral strictures. Indian J Urol 2011
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Peterson AC, Webster GD. Management of urethral stricture disease: developing options for surgical inter¬vention. BJU Int 2004
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Waxman SW, Morey AF. Management of urethral strictures. Lancet 2006
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Levy ME, Elliott SP. Graft Use in Bulbar Urethroplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2017
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Barbagli G, De Stefani S, Annino F, De Carne C, Bianchi G. Muscle- and nerve-sparing bulbar urethroplasty: a new technique. Eur Urol 2008
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Kulkarni S, Barbagli G, Sansalone S, Lazzeri M. One-sided anterior urethroplasty: a new dorsal onlay graft technique. BJU Int 2009
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Morey A. Urethral stricture is now an open surgical disease. J Urol 2009
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Santucci RA, McAninch JW, Mario LA, Rajpurkar A, Chopra AK, Miller KS, et al. Urethroplasty in patients older than 65 years: indications, results, outcomes and suggested treatment modifications. J Urol 2004
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Verze P, De Nunzio C, Vitarelli A, Carmignani L. Contemporary urethral stricture characteristics in the developed world. Urology 2013
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Yalcinkaya F, Zengin K, Sertcelik N, Yigitbasi O, Bozkurt H, Sarikaya T, et al. Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in the Treatment of Urethral Strictures - Does the Stricture Length Affect Success?. Adv Clin Exp Med 2015
  11. [CrossRef] 11. El-Kasaby AW, Fath-Alla M, Noweir A, el-Halaby MR, Zaka¬ria W, el-Beialy MH. The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol 1993
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Bhargava S, Chapple CR. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int 2004
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Barbagli G, Vallasciani S, Romano G, Fabbri F, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. Morbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheek. Eur Urol 2010
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int 2004
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Barbagli G, Selli C, di Cello V, Mottola A. A one-stage dorsal free-graft urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures. Br J Urol 1996
  16. [CrossRef] 16. Asopa HS, Garg M, Singhal GG, Singh L, Asopa J, Nischal A. Dorsal free graft urethroplasty for urethral stricture by ventral s