Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

East-West and Radial Anisotropy in Cosmic Ray Modulation

Pages
187–192
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For semi-diurnal anisotropy, it is found that the magnitude of the 3-Hr component is larger than the 6-Hr component during the positive polarity epoch; which results in shifting the anisotropy vector towards earlier hours, but the same does not hold good for the negative polarity epoch i.e., the magnitude of 6-Hr component is not always found to be greater than the 3-Hr component.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The cosmic ray (CR) data observed with the Deep River neutron monitoring station has been harmonically analyzed for the period 1964--95 to obtain the diurnal and semi-diurnal components of cosmic ray intensity on geomagnetically 60 quiet days.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The annual diurnal anisotropy vectors have been resolved into two components: one along the 12-Hr direction, the radial anisotropy component; and the other along 18-Hr direction, east-west anisotropy component.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For semi-diurnal anisotropy, it is found that the magnitude of the 3-Hr component is larger than the 6-Hr component during the positive polarity epoch; which results in shifting the anisotropy vector towards earlier hours, but the same does not hold good for the negative polarity epoch i.e., the magnitude of 6-Hr component is not always found to be greater than the 3-Hr component.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cosmic rays · diurnal · semi-diurnal

Abstract

The cosmic ray (CR) data observed with the Deep River neutron monitoring station has been harmonically analyzed for the period 1964--95 to obtain the diurnal and semi-diurnal components of cosmic ray intensity on geomagnetically 60 quiet days. The annual diurnal anisotropy vectors have been resolved into two components: one along the 12-Hr direction, the radial anisotropy component; and the other along 18-Hr direction, east-west anisotropy component. It is observed that when the polarity of solar poloidal magnetic field (SPMF) in northern hemisphere (NH) is positive, the radial anisotropy component increases; whereas, the east-west anisotropy component decreases. This results in shifting the diurnal anisotropy vector towards earlier hours during the positive polarity epoch. During the negative polarity epoch, the east-west anisotropy component attains its maximum and the radial anisotropy component attains its minimum, which results in shifting the anisotropy vector gradually towards later hours. For semi-diurnal anisotropy, it is found that the magnitude of the 3-Hr component is larger than the 6-Hr component during the positive polarity epoch; which results in shifting the anisotropy vector towards earlier hours, but the same does not hold good for the negative polarity epoch i.e., the magnitude of 6-Hr component is not always found to be greater than the 3-Hr component.

Özet

The cosmic ray (CR) data observed with the Deep River neutron monitoring station has been harmonically analyzed for the period 1964--95 to obtain the diurnal and semi-diurnal components of cosmic ray intensity on geomagnetically 60 quiet days. The annual diurnal anisotropy vectors have been resolved into two components: one along the 12-Hr direction, the radial anisotropy component; and the other along 18-Hr direction, east-west anisotropy component. It is observed that when the polarity of solar poloidal magnetic field (SPMF) in northern hemisphere (NH) is positive, the radial anisotropy component increases; whereas, the east-west anisotropy component decreases. This results in shifting the diurnal anisotropy vector towards earlier hours during the positive polarity epoch. During the negative polarity epoch, the east-west anisotropy component attains its maximum and the radial anisotropy component attains its minimum, which results in shifting the anisotropy vector gradually towards later hours. For semi-diurnal anisotropy, it is found that the magnitude of the 3-Hr component is larger than the 6-Hr component during the positive polarity epoch; which results in shifting the anisotropy vector towards earlier hours, but the same does not hold good for the negative polarity epoch i.e., the magnitude of 6-Hr component is not always found to be greater than the 3-Hr component.

🔖

Cite This Article

MISHRA, R. A., MISHRA, R. K. (2005). East-West and Radial Anisotropy in Cosmic Ray Modulation. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 187–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/378774

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. E. Antonucci, D. Marocchi and G.E. Perona, Astrophys. J. (USA), 220, (1978), 915. W.R. Webber and J.A.Lockwood, J. Geophys. Res. (USA), 93, (1988), 8735. K. Nagashima and K. Fujimoto, Planet. Space Sci. (France), 37, (1989), 1421. S. Kumar, S.K. Shrivastava, S.K. Dubey, M.K. Richhariya and U. Gulati, Ind. J. Radio and Space Phys. (India),, (1998), 150. I. Sabbah, 26thInt. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Utah), 7, (1999a), 272. Sabbah I., Solar Phys. (Netherlands), 188, (1999b) 403. Y. Munakata, S. Tatsuoka, S. Yasues, K. Munakata, S. Mori, Z. Fujii, S. Sakakibara, H. Ueno and K. Fujimoto, thInt. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Rome), 4, (1995), 615. H.S. Ahluwalia and M.M. Fikani, J. Geophys. Res. (USA), 101, (1996), 11087. A. Hashim and Thambyahpillai, Planet. Space Sci., 17, (1969), 1879. Rao, U.R., Ananth, A.G. and Agrawal, S.P., Planet. Space Sci., 20, 1799. H. Mavromichalaki, Astrophys. and Space Sci., 68, (1980b), 137. M.A. Forman and L.J. Glesson, Astrophys. and Space Sci., 32, (1975), 77. H. Mavromichalaki, Astrophys. and Space Sci., 80, (1979), 59. H. Mavromichalaki, Astrophys. and Space Sci., 71, (1980a), 101. H. Mavromichalaki, Earth, Moon and Planets, 47, (1989), 61. M.A. El-Borie, I. Sabbah, A. Darwish and A. Bishara, 24thInt. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Rome), 4, (1995a), 603. M.A. El-Borie, I. Sabbah, A. Darwish and A. Bishara, 24thInt. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Rome), 4, (1995b), 619. H.S. Ahluwalia, J. Geophys. Res. (USA), 99, (1994a), 11561. H.S. Ahluwalia, J. Geophys. Res. (USA), 101, (1996), 13549. K. Nagashima and I. Morishita, 16thInt. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Kyoto), MG 3-29, (1979), 13. K. Munakata and K. Nagashima, Int. Symp. Cosmic Rays (Awate), (1984), 144. J.R. Jokipii, E.H. Levy and W.B. Hubbard, Astrophys. J. (USA), 213, (1977), 861. M.L.Van Staden and M.S. Potgieter, Planet. Space Sci. (France), 39, (1991), 1237. H.S. Ahluwalia, J. Geophys. Res. (USA), 99, (1994b), 23515. H.S. Ahluwalia, Geophys. Res. Lett. (USA), 15, (1988), 287. M.S. Potgieter, H. Moraal, B.C. Rasbenheimer and P.H. Stoker, S. Afr. J. Phys. (South Africa), 3, (1980), 90. M.L. Duldig, 22ndInt. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Ireland ), 3, (1991), 437.