Cosmologically this may have far-reachingconsequences, to the extent that existence of multimagnetic monopole black holes may become a reality in our universe.Infalling charged particle geodesics may reveal, through particular integrals, their inner secrets, which are screened fromour observation.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We extend the Majumdar{Papapetrou solution of the Einstein{Maxwell equations, which are implied generallyfor static electric charge in nonrotating metrics, to encompass equally well magnetic charges.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the absence of Higgs andnon-Abelian gauge elds, 'dyonic' is to be understood in this simpler sense.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cosmologically this may have far-reachingconsequences, to the extent that existence of multimagnetic monopole black holes may become a reality in our universe.Infalling charged particle geodesics may reveal, through particular integrals, their inner secrets, which are screened fromour observation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
We extend the Majumdar{Papapetrou solution of the Einstein{Maxwell equations, which are implied generallyfor static electric charge in nonrotating metrics, to encompass equally well magnetic charges. In the absence of Higgs andnon-Abelian gauge elds, 'dyonic' is to be understood in this simpler sense. Cosmologically this may have far-reachingconsequences, to the extent that existence of multimagnetic monopole black holes may become a reality in our universe.Infalling charged particle geodesics may reveal, through particular integrals, their inner secrets, which are screened fromour observation.
🔖
Cite This Article
MAZHARIMOUSAVI, S., HALİLSOY, M. (2016). Revisiting the dyonic Majumdar{Papapetrou black holes. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 163–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/377954
1]Majumdar, S. D.Phys. Rev.1947,72, 390-398. [2]Papapetrou, A.P. Roy. Irish. Acad. A1947,A51, 191-204. [3]Hartle J. B.; Hawking, S. W.Commun. Math. phys.1972,26, 87-101. [4]Kastor, D.; Traschen, J. H.Phys. Rev. D1993,47, 5370-5375. [5]Brill, D. R.; Horowitz, G. T.; Kastor, D.; Traschen, J. H.Phys. Rev. D1994,49, 840-852. [6]Gibbons, G. W.; Lu, H.; Pope, C. N.Phys. Rev. Lett.2005,94, 131602-131602. [7]Israel, W.; Wilson, G. A.J. Math. Phys.1972,13, 865-867. [8]Corless, R. M.; Gonnet, G. H.; Hare, D. E. G.; Jeffrey, D. J.; Knuth. D. E.Adv. Comput. Math.1996,5, 329-359.174