Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

A phenomenological calculation for W+W− diboson production for the Large Hadron Collider and Future Circular Collider

Pages
737–741
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are obtained by CT14, MMHT2014, and MSTW2008 parton distribution functions.Finally, the advantage of increasing collision energy at hadron colliders is discussed by comparing the amount of datarecorded at different center-of-mass energies for the pp → W+W− process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN has been designed to collide beams of protons at 7, 8, 13, and14 TeV center-of-mass energies and a new hadron collider called the Future Circular Collider (FCC), which is larger andmore energetic than the LHC, is being planned for the near future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The maximum planned energy for FCC is 100 TeVcenter-of-mass energy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are obtained by CT14, MMHT2014, and MSTW2008 parton distribution functions.Finally, the advantage of increasing collision energy at hadron colliders is discussed by comparing the amount of datarecorded at different center-of-mass energies for the pp → W+W− process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN has been designed to collide beams of protons at 7, 8, 13, and14 TeV center-of-mass energies and a new hadron collider called the Future Circular Collider (FCC), which is larger andmore energetic than the LHC, is being planned for the near future. The maximum planned energy for FCC is 100 TeVcenter-of-mass energy. In this regard, we present the leading order and next-to-leading order cross-section predictions oftwo simultaneously produced opposite-sign W bosons at 7, 8, 13, 14, and 100 TeV center-of-mass energies by using theMCFM MC generator. The results are obtained by CT14, MMHT2014, and MSTW2008 parton distribution functions.Finally, the advantage of increasing collision energy at hadron colliders is discussed by comparing the amount of datarecorded at different center-of-mass energies for the pp → W+W− process.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLSİZ, K., OĞUL, H. (2018). A phenomenological calculation for W+W− diboson production for the Large Hadron Collider and Future Circular Collider. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 737–741. https://ajindex.com/articles/377857

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Barletta, W.; Battaglia, M.; Klute, M.; Mangano, M.; Prestemon, S.; Rossi, L.; Skands, P. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2014, 764, 352-368
  2. Aad, G.; Abajyan, T.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Khalek, S. A.; Abdelalim, A. A.; Abdinov, O.; Aben, R.; Abi, B.; Abolins, M. et al. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 716, 1-29
  3. Chatrchyan, S.; Khachatryan, V.; Sirunyan, A. M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Aguilo, E.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; Fabjan, C. et al. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 716, 30-61
  4. Herrero, M. NATO Sci. Ser. C 1999, 534, 1-59
  5. Evans, L.; Bryant, P. J. Instrum. 2008, 3, S08001
  6. Benedikt, M.; Zimmermann, F. CERN-ACC 2016, 0005
  7. Aad, G.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Khalek, S. A.; Abdelalim, A. A.; Abdesselam, A.; Abdinov, O.; Abi, B.; Abolins, M.; AbouZeid, O. S. et al. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 712, 289-308
  8. Campbell, J. M.; Ellis, R. K. In Nuclear Physics B Conference Proceedings: FERMILAB-CONF-10-244-T; Batavia, IL, USA, July 2010. pp. 10-15
  9. Dulat, S.; Hou, T.; Guzzi, M.; Huston, J.; Nadolsky, P.; Pumplin, J.; Schmidt, C.; Stump, D.; Yuan, C. P. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 033006
  10. Harland-Lang, L. A.; Martin, A. D.; Throne, R. S. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 204
  11. Martin, A. D.; Stirling, W. J.; Thorne, R. S.; Watt, G. Eur. Phys. J. C 2009, 63, 189-205
  12. Ogul, H.; Dilsiz, K.; Tiras, E.; Tan, P.; Onel, Y.; Nachtman, J. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 2016, 7865689
  13. Dilsiz, K.; Tiras, E. Turk. J. Phys. 2018, 42, 495-500.