Journals / Journal of International Environmental Application and Science / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Generation of Electricity and Sludge Reduction in a Microbial Fuel Cell

Pages
141–151
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental results showed higher SCOD removal efficiency in the aerobic batch reactor (41.2% and 42.7%) compared to MFC system (32% and 32%) during Run I and Run II, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the last few years, the attractiveness of renewable energy production from waste has increased attention for the use of microbial fuel cells.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Microbial fuel cell (MFC) has a set-up which generates electrical energy from the biochemical energy released by the catabolic reactions of microbial growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental results showed higher SCOD removal efficiency in the aerobic batch reactor (41.2% and 42.7%) compared to MFC system (32% and 32%) during Run I and Run II, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:sewage sludge · sludge reduction · cod removal

Abstract

In the last few years, the attractiveness of renewable energy production from waste has increased attention for the use of microbial fuel cells. Microbial fuel cell (MFC) has a set-up which generates electrical energy from the biochemical energy released by the catabolic reactions of microbial growth. An MFC system, equipped with two chambers having chromium-nickel plate electrodes, was used to investigate the electricity generation potential in parallel to sludge reduction and carbon removal. In the first stage of this study, activated sludge was cultivated for 1 month in a batch reactor prior to seeding into MFC. In the second stage, a lab-scale two- chambered MFC system was constructed. In the monitoring stage, the operation of MFC was examined in 2 different set of experiments, where MFC voltage generation (V) and digestion of sludge were recorded. Sludge reduction in MFC was compared with that of an aerobic sludge digester based on the decrease of volatile suspended solids (VSS) and filtered COD (SCOD). Experimental results showed higher SCOD removal efficiency in the aerobic batch reactor (41.2% and 42.7%) compared to MFC system (32% and 32%) during Run I and Run II, respectively. The observed decrease in VSS was 31.5% and 30.7% in the MFC system, 51.8% and 53.9% in the batch aerobic reactor during Run I and Run II, respectively. The last stage was conducted to observe electrical parameters. Experimental findings in this study show that, MFC performance is comparable to that of an aerobic sludge digester with the additional benefit of electrical energy generation.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARLİKANOVAİTE-BALIKÇI, A., ÖZGÜN, Ö. K. (2019). Generation of Electricity and Sludge Reduction in a Microbial Fuel Cell. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 141–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/376634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abourached C, Catal T, Liu H, (2014) Efficiency of single chamber microbial fuel cells for removal of cadmium and zinc with simultaneous electricity production. Water Research 51, 228-33. APHA-AWWA, (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 20th Ed., American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA. Athalathil S, Stüber F, Bengoa C, Font J, Fortuny A, Fabregat A, (2014) Characterization and performance of carbonaceous materials obtained from exhausted sludges for the anaerobic biodecolorization of the azo dye acid Orange II. J. Hazard. Mater. 267, 21–30.
  2. Biffinger JC, Pietron J, Bretschger O, Nadeau L, Johnson J, Glenn R.; Williams C, Nealson, K H, Ringeisen BR., (2008) The influence of acidity on microbial fuel cells containing Shewanella oneidensis, U.S. Navy Research 15. Buchanan JR, Seabloom RW (2004) Aerobic Treatment of Wastewater and Aerobic Treatment Units Text, University Curriculum Development for Decentralized Wastewater Management, National Decentralized Water Resource Capacity Development Project,University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. Cai I, Zhang H, Feng Y, Wang Y, Yu M, (2018) Sludge decrement and electricity generation of sludge microbial fuel cell enhanced by zero valent iron, J. Clean.Prod.174, 35-41.
  3. Catal T, Fana Y, Li K, Bermek H, Liu, H, (2008) Effects of furan derivatives and phenolic compounds on electricity generation in microbial fuel cells, J. Power Sourc, 180,162-166.
  4. Chen X, Jeyaseelan S, Graham N, (2002) Physical and chemical properties study of the activated carbon made from sewage sludge, Waste Manag. 22, 755–760.
  5. Chen Y, Zhang H, Wang, W. Lu, Z. Zhou,Y. Zhang, L.Ren, (2014) Influence ofpyrolysis temperature on characteristics and heavy metal adsorptive performance of biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge, Bioresour. Technol. 164, 47–54.
  6. Du Z, Li H,Gu T, (2007) A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells:a promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy. Biotechnol.Adv.25(5), 464-482.
  7. ElMekawy A, Srikanth S, Bajracharya S, Hegab HM, Nigam PS, Singh A, Mohan SV, Pant D (2015) Food and agricultural wastes as substrates for bioelectrochemical system (BES):the synchronized recovery of sustainable energy and waste treatment. Food Research International.73,213-15.
  8. Gajaraj S, Hu Z, (2014) Integration of microbial fuel cell techniques into activated sludge wastewater treatment processes to improve nitrogen remo