The technique in our institution seems to be more effective than routine pelvic MRI scans in the intestinal endometriosis.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The diagnosis of deep intestinal endometriosis is mandatory to plan treatment and for follow-up; however, there is no consensus worldwide in the use of rectal/vaginal opacification and anti-peristaltic agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, being defined as an option for the examination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The transvaginal ultrasound images of previous MRI with the standard protocol, and recent MRI in our institution with rectal/vaginal opacification with water and the anti-peristaltic agent are presented in four cases for comparison, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The technique in our institution seems to be more effective than routine pelvic MRI scans in the intestinal endometriosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Özet
The diagnosis of deep intestinal endometriosis is mandatory to plan treatment and for follow-up; however, there is no consensus worldwide in the use of rectal/vaginal opacification and anti-peristaltic agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, being defined as an option for the examination. The transvaginal ultrasound images of previous MRI with the standard protocol, and recent MRI in our institution with rectal/vaginal opacification with water and the anti-peristaltic agent are presented in four cases for comparison, respectively. The technique in our institution seems to be more effective than routine pelvic MRI scans in the intestinal endometriosis.
🔖
Cite This Article
GÜRSES, C., MULAYİM, B., ÇAĞLAR, M. (2019). The rectal vaginal opacification with water and the anti-peristaltic agent in magnetic resonance scanning of the intestinal endometriosis. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 208–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/376441
Guerriero S, Alcázar JL, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Perniciano M, Piras A, et al. Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Comparison Between 2-Dimensional Ultrasonography (US), 3-Dimensional US, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:1511-21
Chamié LP, Blasbalg R, Pereira RM, Warmbrand G, Serafini PC. Findings of pelvic endometriosis at transvaginal US, MR imaging, and laparoscopy. Radiographics 2011;31:E77-100
Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, Kinkel K, Cunha TM, Guerra A, et al. European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 2017;27:2765-75
Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FP, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:318-32
Bourdel N, Alves J, Pickering G, Ramilo I, Roman H, Canis M. Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale? Hum Reprod Update 2015;21:136-52
Thalluri AL, Knox S, Nguyen T. MRI findings in deep infiltrating endometriosis: A pictorial essay. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017;61:767-73
Türk Radyoloji Derneği (TRD ), MRG ve BT İnceleme Standartları,Pelvik MRG, TRD Standart 2018 Revizyonu,