Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Major problems, current characteristics and future career plans of obstetrics and gynecology residents in Turkey

Pages
187–192
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most common future plan of the residents was to attend a subspecialty program in the field of obstetrics and gynecology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the current problems and future career plans of obstetrics and gynecology residents in Turkey.Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a survey was conducted with 143 trainees from 25 cities in different regions of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants’ responses.Results: The mean number of trainees in each hospital was 24 in education and research hospitals and 15 in university hospitals (p<0.001).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most common future plan of the residents was to attend a subspecialty program in the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To evaluate the current problems and future career plans of obstetrics and gynecology residents in Turkey.Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a survey was conducted with 143 trainees from 25 cities in different regions of Turkey. The questionnaire, which was sent via e-mail to all available trainees, consisted of four parts: information on hospitals, number and variety of surgical interventions, scientific activities, and current problems. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants’ responses.Results: The mean number of trainees in each hospital was 24 in education and research hospitals and 15 in university hospitals (p<0.001). Perinatology, oncology, and infertility clinics were present in about 70% of the hospitals, and there was no difference in this regard between public and university hospitals. Most trainees (68.5%) complained about being alone in an outpatient clinic. Third-year trainees from training and research hospitals performed a significantly higher number of vaginal births than those at universities (p=0.035). Most trainees complained about their workload during their residency in both training and research hospitals (74.4%) and university hospitals (66%). The three most common plans for the future were to attend a subspecialty program in the field of obstetrics and gynecology (28%), to pursue an academic career (23.1%), and to work in a private hospital (21%).Conclusion: Extremely long work hours, excessive workload, many monthly duties, and lack of supervision at outpatient clinics were found to be the major problems of the obstetrics and gynecology residents in Turkey. The most common future plan of the residents was to attend a subspecialty program in the field of obstetrics and gynecology.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKILINÇ, S., YASSA, M., ÇOŞKUN, B., İNCE, O., KARATEKE, A. (2019). Major problems, current characteristics and future career plans of obstetrics and gynecology residents in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 187–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/376240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Nunes F, Bevan R. The implementation of a European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ENTOG). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;87:199-201
  2. Barber MD, Maher C. Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1815-33
  3. Kafadar YT, Gode F, Demir C, Baloglu A. Current challenges of the gynecology assistants ın Turkey. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2013;10:37-41
  4. Tuncer AM, Tatar M, Şahin İ. University hospitals in Turkey: Structural crisis in financing or consequence of mismanagement? Journal of Hospital Administration 2017;6:52. 5. www.osym.gov.tr
  5. Stonehocker J, Muruthi J, Rayburn WF. Is There a Shortage of Obstetrician-Gynecologists? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2017;44:121-32
  6. Pulcrano M, Evans SR, Sosin M. Quality of Life and Burnout Rates Across Surgical Specialties: A Systematic Review. JAMA Surg 2016;151:970-8
  7. Becker JL, Milad MP, Klock SC. Burnout, depression, and career satisfaction: cross-sectional study of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1444-9
  8. Alston MJ, Autry AM, Wagner SA, Winkel A, Allshouse AA, Stephenson-Famy A. Obstetricians and Gynecologists of the Future: A Survey of Medical Students Applying to Residency. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:1-7
  9. Rodríguez D, Christopoulos P, Martins N, Pärgmäe P, Werner HM. Working conditions survey and trainees situation: new approach to auditing the situation of European trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology ten years later. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;147:130-4
  10. Prabhu AM, Chiang S, Schiff MA, Landis CA, Lee K, Reed SD. Effects of home call on obstetrics and gynecology resident sleep patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:409-10
  11. Alston MJ, Metz TD, Fothergill R, Meg Autry A, Wagner SA, Allshouse AA, et al. Factors Influencing Residency Program Selection by Medical Students Pursuing Obstetrics and Gynecology. J Grad Med Educ 2017;9:123-7
  12. Cadish LA, Muffly TM. Recent Ob/Gyn Residency Graduates’ Experience With Hysterectomy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;132:46S
  13. Alston MJ, Ehrig J, Autry AM, Wagner SA, Kohl-Thomas BM, Allshouse AA, et al. Career Expectations of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents and Future Residents. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:1-7
  14. Glaser LM, Alvi FA, Milad MP. Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:340.e1-340.e6
  15. Blanchard MH, Ramsey PS, Gala RB, Gyamfi Bannerman C, Srinivas SK, Hernandez-Rey AE. Impact of the medical