Journals / Turkish Journal of Rheumatology(.)Archives of Rheumatology / 2010 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Cerrahi ve Doÿal Menopozlu Kadınlarda Kemik Dansitometri ve Kemik Yıkım Marker Düzeylerinin Menopoz Tipi Ve Süresi ile ilişkisi

Relationship of Bone Densitometry and Bone Resorption Markers With Menopausal Type and Duration

Pages
29–33
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also suggest that there is not a longterm relationship between serum bone turnover markers or bone density and the etiology of menopause.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Menopause age and bone mineral density are positively related and there is a rapid bone loss in the early postmenopausal period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A ratio of 30% of post-menopausal women are affected from osteoporosis developing due to bone loss and this causes 40% risk of fracture in a 50- year old woman.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also suggest that there is not a longterm relationship between serum bone turnover markers or bone density and the etiology of menopause.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Menopause age and bone mineral density are positively related and there is a rapid bone loss in the early postmenopausal period. A ratio of 30% of post-menopausal women are affected from osteoporosis developing due to bone loss and this causes 40% risk of fracture in a 50- year old woman. Materials and Methods: In this sudy, serum osteocalcin and urine deoxypridinoline levels were analyzed in 102 postmenapausal and 48 healthy premenopausal controls who presented to gynecology outpatient clinic. Bone densitometry was obtained from all postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal patients were further divided into four groups according to time since menopause: <5 years, 5-9 years, 10-19 years and >20 years.Results: Mean (SD) age in 48 premenopausal women was 47.7 (3.7) while it was 56.5 (6.8) in 102 post-menopausal women. 34 out of 102 post-menopausal women had surgical menopause due to bilateral oopheroctomy+hysterectomy while the remaining had natural menopause. No significant difference was found in bone-turnover markers between women with surgical and natural menopause.Conclusion: Although there was not a statistically significant difference between bone-turnover markers, bone mineral density stays lower in surgical menopausal patients and this difference disappear only after about 20 years. Also bone turnover markers are usually high up to five years after surgical menopause and return to normal levels after then. Thus, our study suggested that oopheroctomy does not cause additional risk to hysterectomy. We also suggest that there is not a longterm relationship between serum bone turnover markers or bone density and the etiology of menopause.

Özet

Amaç: Kadınlarda menopoz yaşı ile kemik mineral yoğunluğu arasında pozitif bir ilişki mevcut olup menopoz sonrası erken dönemde hızlı bir şekilde kemik kaybı gerçekleşmektedir. Azalmış kemik yoğunluğu sonrası ortaya çıkan osteoporoz postmenopozal kadınların %30'unu etkileyerek 50 yaşındaki bir kadında %40 kırık riskine yol açmaktadır. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Çalışmamızda Kadın doğum polikliniğimize başvuran 102 postmenopozal ve kontrol grubunu oluşturan 48 premenopozal, toplam 150 hastanın serum ostekalsin ve idrar deoksipridinolin düzeylerine bakıldı. Post menopozal hastaların Kemik dansitometrileri ölçüldü. Çalışmaya alınan postmenopozal hastalar menopoz sürelerine göre 5 yıldan az, 5-9 yıl, 10-19 yıl ve 20 yıl üzeri olacak şekilde 4 gruba ayrıldı.Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan toplam 150 hastanın 48'i premenopozal olup yaş ortalamaları 47.7 (SD 3.7) , kalan 102 postmenopozal hasta ise 56,5 (SD 6.8) yaşındaydı. Postmenopozal 102 hastanın 34 'ü cerrahi menopoz olup bilateral ooferektomi + histerektomili, 68 hasta ise normal menopozlu hastaydı. Cerrahi menopozla doğal menopozlu kadınlarda kemik turnover markerları arasında anlamlı ilişki saptanmadı.Sonuç: Cerrahi menopozla normal menopozlu hastalar arasında istatiksel olarak anlamlı fark olmasa da kemik mineral yoğunlukları cerrahi menopozlularda daha düşük seyretmekte ve bu fark 20 yıldan sonra eşitlenmektedir. Kemik yıkım ürünleri cerrahi sonrası <5 yıl olan grupta yüksek olup sonraki dönemlerde bu fark ortadan kalkmaktadır. Sonuç olarak histerektomi yapılırken overlerin çıkarılması diğer toplumlarda yapılan çalışmaların çoğuna benzer şekilde bizim hasta populasyonumuzda da osteoporoz üzerine olumsuz bir risk katmamaktadır. Uzun dönem takibinde cerrahi menopozla normal menopoz arasında kemik yıkım ürünleri ve kemik mineral yoğunluğu açısından anlamlı fark yoktur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, N., BİLİR, C., CİNEMRE, H., PEKUZ, M., GÖKOSMANOĞLU, F. (2010). Cerrahi ve Doÿal Menopozlu Kadınlarda Kemik Dansitometri ve Kemik Yıkım Marker Düzeylerinin Menopoz Tipi Ve Süresi ile ilişkisi. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology(.)Archives of Rheumatology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 29–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/376107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E. Early menopause, number of reproductive years, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 983-8. Halmesmäki KH, Hurskainen RA, Cacciatore B, Tiitinen A, Paavonen JA. Effect of hysterectomy or LNG-IUS on serum inhibin B levels and ovarian blood flow. Maturitas 2007; 57: 279-85. Durães Simões R, Chada Baracat E, Szjenfeld VL, de Lima GR, José Gonçalves W, de Carvalho Ramos Bortoletto C. Effects of simple hysterectomy on bone loss. Sao Paulo Med J 1995; 113: 1012-5.
  2. Watson NR, Studd JW, Garnett T, Savvas M, Milligan P. Bone loss after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 72-7.
  3. Smeets-Goevaers CG, Lesusink GL, Papapoulos SE, Maartens LW, Keyzer JJ, Weerdenburg JP, et al. The prevalence of low bone mineral density in Dutch perimenopausal women: the Eindhoven perimenopausal osteoporosis study. Osteoporosis Int 1998; 8: 404-9.
  4. Tuppurainen M, Kröger H, Saarikoski S, Honkanen R, Alhava E. The effect of gynecological risk factors on lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in peri- and postmenopausal women. Maturitas 1995; 21: 137-45.
  5. Grainge MJ, Coupland CA, Cliffe SJ, Chilvers CE, Hosking DJ. Reproductive, menstrual and menopausal factors: which are associated with bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women? Osteoporosis Int 2001; 12: 777-87.
  6. Carranza-Lira S, Nájera Mojica JL, Herrera J, Ramos- Ponce D, Olivares-Segura A, Cardoso-Saldaña G, et al. Changes in hormones, lipids and symptoms after the administration of a commercial preparation with dehydroepiandrosterone in postmenopausal women. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 2002; 45: 181-3. Larcos G. Hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: effect on bone mineral density. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38: 452-4. Shilbayeh S. Prevalence of osteoporosis and its reproductive risk factors among Jordanian women: a cross-sectional study. Osteoporosis Int 2003; 14: 929-40.
  7. Fiore CE, Falcida E, Foti R, Motta M, Tamburino C. Differences in the time course of the effects of oophorectomy in women on parameters of bone metabolism, and interleukin-1levels in the circulation. Bone Miner 1993; 20: 79-85.
  8. Parker WH, Broder MS, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Farquhar C, Berek JS. Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 50: 354-61. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician- gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin 7. Washington, DC: AC