Journals / Turkish Journal of Rheumatology(.)Archives of Rheumatology / 2012 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Tek Doz Indometazin Sağlıklı Genç Erişkinlerde Premotor Reaksiyon Zamanını Uzatmıyor: Randomize, Placebo Kontrollü, Çift Kör, Çapraz Geçişli Çalışma

A Single Dose of Indomethacin Does Not Prolong Premotor Reaction Time in Young, Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study

Pages
24–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This may suggest that indomethacin has no effect on the information processing speed in healthy adults.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the hypothesis that a single dose of indomethacin may affect information processing speed in healthy subjects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: In this cross-sectional, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, cross-over study, 30 healthy adults (8 males, 22 females; mean age 32.4±5.3 years; range 24 to 42 years) received a single dose of 25 mg indomethacin (Endol, oral capsule, DEVA Pharmaceutics, Kartepe, Turkey) and placebo.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This may suggest that indomethacin has no effect on the information processing speed in healthy adults.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the hypothesis that a single dose of indomethacin may affect information processing speed in healthy subjects. Patients and methods: In this cross-sectional, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, cross-over study, 30 healthy adults (8 males, 22 females; mean age 32.4±5.3 years; range 24 to 42 years) received a single dose of 25 mg indomethacin (Endol, oral capsule, DEVA Pharmaceutics, Kartepe, Turkey) and placebo. Premotor reaction and response times were measured electromyographically before and after the administration of preparations by a blinded researcher in the Electrophysiology Laboratory at Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara. Results: Premotor reaction time measurements before and after a single dose of indomethacin were 169.1±36.3 and 160.2±29.5 msec, respectively (p=0.113). Premotor reaction time measurements before and after a single dose of placebo were 158.7±35.5 and 161.5±36.3 msec, respectively (p=0.516). There was also no statistically significant difference between premotor reaction time measurements of the indomethacin and placebo groups. Conclusion: A single dose of indomethacin did not change premotor reaction time and response time in healthy adults. This may suggest that indomethacin has no effect on the information processing speed in healthy adults.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada sağlıklı bireylerde tek doz indometazinin bilgi işlem hızını etkileyebileceği hipotezi araştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Kesitsel, randomize, plasebo kontrollü, çift kör, çapraz geçişli bu çalışmada, 30 sağlıklı erişkin bireye (8 erkek, 22 kadın; ort. yaş 32.4±5.3 yıl; dağılım 24-42 yıl) tek doz 25 mg'lık indometazin (Endol, oral kapsül, DEVA İlaç, Kartepe, Türkiye) ve plasebo uygulandı. İlaç uygulamaları öncesi ve sonrası premotor reaksiyon zamanı ve tepki zamanı çalışmaya kör bir araştırmacı tarafından Ankara Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı Elektrofizyoloji Laboratuvarı'nda elektromiyografik olarak ölçüldü.Bulgular: Tek doz indometasin öncesi ve sonrası premotor reaksiyon zamanları sırasıyla 169.1±36.3 ve 160.2±29.5 msn (p=0.113) olarak ölçüldü. Tek doz plasebo öncesi ve sonrası premotor reaksiyon zamanları sırasıyla 158.7±35.5 ve 161.5±36.3 msn (p=0.516) olarak ölçüldü. İndometazin ve plasebo grupları arasında premotor reaksiyon zaman ölçümleri açısından istatistiksel anlamlı fark saptanmadı.Sonuç: Tek doz indometazin sağlıklı erişkinlerde premotor reaksiyon zamanı ve tepki zamanı ölçümlerini değiştirmedi. İndometazinin sağlıklı erişkinlerde bilgi işlem hızını etkilemediği düşünülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYEMİŞÇİ-TAŞKIRAN, Ö., CAN, A. G., GÜNENDİ, Z., BEYAZOVA, M. (2012). Tek Doz Indometazin Sağlıklı Genç Erişkinlerde Premotor Reaksiyon Zamanını Uzatmıyor: Randomize, Placebo Kontrollü, Çift Kör, Çapraz Geçişli Çalışma. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology(.)Archives of Rheumatology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 24–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/376076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Reynolds JEF, Parfitt K, Parsons AV, Sweetman SC, editors. In: Martindale the extra pharmacopoeia. 31st ed. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 1996. p. 51-4.
  2. Hoehn BD, Palmer TD, Steinberg GK. Neurogenesis in rats after focal cerebral ischemia is enhanced by indomethacin. Stroke 2005;36:2718-24.
  3. Bernardi A, Bavaresco L, Wink MR, Jacques-Silva MC, Delgado-Cañedo A, Lenz G, et al. Indomethacin stimulates activity and expression of ecto-5'- nucleotidase/CD73 in glioma cell lines. Eur J Pharmacol 2007;569:8-15.
  4. McGeer PL, Schulzer M, McGeer EG. Arthritis and anti- inflammatory agents as possible protective factors for Alzheimer's disease: a review of 17 epidemiologic studies. Neurology 1996;47:425-32.
  5. Tabet N, Feldman H. Indomethacin for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;CD003673. Rogers J, Kirby LC, Hempelman SR, Berry DL, McGeer PL, Kaszniak AW, et al. Clinical trial of indomethacin in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1993;43:1609-11. Michon A. The concept of mild cognitive impairment: relevance and limits in clinical practice. Front Neurol Neurosci 2009;24:12-9.
  6. Kutukcu Y, Marks WJ Jr, Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ. Simple and choice reaction time in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res 1999;815:367-72.
  7. Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Amdor G, Pillar T. Reaction and movement times in patients with hemiparesis for unilateral and bilateral elbow flexion. Phys Ther 1993;73:374-80.
  8. Günendi Z, Taskiran OO, Beyazova M. What is the optimal repetition number in electromyographic reaction time studies? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005;20:754-8.
  9. Ozyemisci-Taskiran O, Gunendi Z, Bolukbasi N, Beyazova M. The effect of a single session submaximal aerobic exercise on premotor fraction of reaction time: an electromyographic study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008;23:231-5.
  10. Ment LR, Peterson BS, Meltzer JA, Vohr B, Allan W, Katz KH, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the long-term influences of early indomethacin exposure on language processing in the brains of prematurely born children. Pediatrics 2006; 118:961-70.
  11. Upton RN, Rasmussen M, Grant C, Martinez AM, Cold GE, Ludbrook GL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indomethacin: effects on cerebral blood flow in anaesthetized sheep. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2008;35:317-23. Seideman P, von Arbin M. Cerebral blood flow and indomethacin drug levels in subjects with and without central nervous side effects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991;31:429-32.
  12. Taskin E, Ozcan K, Canacank