Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Effects of cooling rate on the atomic structure and glass formation process of $Co_{90}Zr_{10}$

Pages
11–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We haveseen that Co-centered Voronoi polyhedrals such as ⟨ 0,2,8,2⟩ , ⟨ 0,0,12,0⟩ , and ⟨ 0,1,10,2⟩ play a dominant role in thedevelopment of the icosahedral order of the Co90 Zr10 alloy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the atomic structure and the glass formation process of Co90 Zr10 metallic glass alloy werestudied by molecular dynamic simulation based on the embedded atom method using four different cooling rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Theaverage atomic volume and the potential energy of the system were observed to be strongly dependent on the coolingrate during rapid solidification, and the glass transition temperature decreased with decreasing cooling rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We haveseen that Co-centered Voronoi polyhedrals such as ⟨ 0,2,8,2⟩ , ⟨ 0,0,12,0⟩ , and ⟨ 0,1,10,2⟩ play a dominant role in thedevelopment of the icosahedral order of the Co90 Zr10 alloy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, the atomic structure and the glass formation process of Co90 Zr10 metallic glass alloy werestudied by molecular dynamic simulation based on the embedded atom method using four different cooling rates. Theaverage atomic volume and the potential energy of the system were observed to be strongly dependent on the coolingrate during rapid solidification, and the glass transition temperature decreased with decreasing cooling rate. The radialdistribution functions and the structure factors derived from molecular dynamics simulations at 300 K agreed well withthe experimental and other molecular dynamics results. The coordination numbers calculated at 300 K were consistentwith the experimental results in the literature. The local structural atomic orders of the system have been characterizedby Honeycutt–Andersen indices and the Voronoi tessellation method. We realized that the FCC and icosahedral shortrangeorder increases with decreasing cooling rate, the icosahedral clusters are predominant in the Co90 Zr10 metallicglass, and the fraction of the icosahedral polyhedra increases with decreasing cooling rate and temperature. We haveseen that Co-centered Voronoi polyhedrals such as ⟨ 0,2,8,2⟩ , ⟨ 0,0,12,0⟩ , and ⟨ 0,1,10,2⟩ play a dominant role in thedevelopment of the icosahedral order of the Co90 Zr10 alloy.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELTEK, M., ŞENGÜL, S. (2019). Effects of cooling rate on the atomic structure and glass formation process of $Co_{90}Zr_{10}$. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 11–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/375943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Chen, H. Acta Metall. 1974, 22, 1505-1511
  2. Inoue, A. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 279-306
  3. Karasu, B; Yanar, A. O.; Erdoğan, O.; Kartal, S.; Ak, G.; Pirangil, S. E. Şişecam Teknik Bülten 2017, 45, 5-17 (in Turkish)
  4. Klement, W.; Willens R. H.; Duwez, P. Nature 1960, 187, 869-870
  5. Miracle, D. B. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 697-702
  6. Malozemoff, A. P.; Williams, A. R.; Terakura, K.; Moruzzi, V. L.; Fukamichi, K. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1983, 35, 192
  7. Suran, G.; Naili, M.; Rivoire, M. J. Appl. Phys. 1990, 67, 5649
  8. Mohammed Idrus, R.; Grundy, P. J. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1986, 19, 1245-1255
  9. Babanova, Y. A.; Sidorenko, A. F.; Ryazhkin, A. V.; Shvetsov, V. R.; Kronmueller, H. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. A 1998, 405, 400-402
  10. Saito, T. Mater. Trans. 2003, 44, 1713-1716
  11. Daw, M. S.; Baskes, M. I. Phsical Rev. B 1984, 29, 6443-6453
  12. Zhou, X. W.; Johnson, R. A; Wadley, H. N. G. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 144113
  13. Smith, W.; Forester, T. R. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 136-141
  14. Zhang, Y.; Mattern, N.; Eckert, J. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 053520
  15. Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Yu, C.; Lu, Z. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 141, 59-67
  16. Cheng, Y. Q.; Sheng, H. W.; Ma, E. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 78, 1-7
  17. Cohen, M. H.; Grest, G.S. Phys. Rev. B 1979, 20, 1077-1098
  18. Haile, J. M. Molecular Dynamics Simulation—Elementary Methods; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1992
  19. Sengul, S.; Celtek, M.; Domekeli, U. Vacuum 2017, 136, 20-27
  20. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, NY, USA, 1991
  21. Zhang, K.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Bian, X. F. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 1-5
  22. Waseda, Y. The Structure of Non-Crystalline Materials-Liquids and Amorphous Solids. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1981
  23. Rößler, U.; Teichler, H. Phys. Rev. E. Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 2000, 61, 394-402
  24. Celtek, M.; Sengul, S. Philos. Mag. 2018, 98, 783-802
  25. Honeycutt, J. D.; Andersen, H. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 4950-4963
  26. Celik, F. A. Phys. Lett. A 2014, 378, 2151-2156
  27. Celtek, M.; Sengul, S.; Domekeli, U.; Canan, C. Eur. Phys. J. B 2016, 89, 1-6
  28. Celtek, M.; Sengul, S.; Domekeli, U. Intermetallics 2017, 84, 62-73
  29. Doye, J. P. K.; Wales, D. J. Science 1996, 271, 484-487
  30. Finney, J. L. Nature 1977, 266, 309-314. [31] ten Wolde, P. R.; Ruiz-Montero, M. J.; Frenkel, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 9932. [32