Journals / Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Anterior Open Scoring Otoplasty with Posterior Dermochondral Flap

Posterior Dermokondral Flep ve Açık Anterior Skoring Tekniği ile Otoplasti Uygulamalarımız

Pages
168–172
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The dermis which is preserved during open scoring otoplasty provides a reliable structural and vascular support to the attached antihelical cartilage

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: There are various methods (reportedly more than 200) described for correcting prominent ears.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Dermis preservation during posterior skin excision has been performed to decrease the risk of possible complications, particularly those associated with sutures, during otoplasty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The dermis which is preserved during open scoring otoplasty provides a reliable structural and vascular support to the attached antihelical cartilage
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: There are various methods (reportedly more than 200) described for correcting prominent ears. Dermis preservation during posterior skin excision has been performed to decrease the risk of possible complications, particularly those associated with sutures, during otoplasty. Material and Methods: We preserved the dermis during posterior elliptic excision to provide vascular and structural support to the antihelical cartilage. The study aimed to determine the reliability and advantages of this method. In this retrospective study, patients who underwent open scoring otoplasty with a preserved posterior dermis were analyzed. In total 55 patients were included.Results: Of the 55 patients (four had unilateral deformity) included, five (9.09%) had postoperative upper pole recurrence, one (12.5% of all asymmetric patients) had persistent asymmetry, one (1.82%) had a few open wounds with some granulation on the anterior skin, two (3.64%) had restrictive anterior skin sloughing, and two (3.6%) had mild antihelical cartilage irregularity. Satisfactory wound healing, antihelical contours, and symmetry were achieved in the remaining patients. Conclusion: Our results were comparable to those reported in recent studies that used similar techniques. The dermis which is preserved during open scoring otoplasty provides a reliable structural and vascular support to the attached antihelical cartilage

Özet

Amaç: Kepçe kulak operasyonları için çok sayıda yöntem tanımlanmıştır (bazı kaynaklara göre bu metotların sayısı 200'ün üzerindedir). Posterior deri eksizyonu sırasında dermisin korunması, komplikasyon oranını azaltmak için, özellikle de sadece sutür ile şekil verme operasyonlarında kullanılmıştır.Amaç: Posterior dermokondral flep ile açık scoring otoplasti tekniğinin güvenirliği ile kıkırdağa yapışık dermisin korunmasının avantajlarını incelemeyi ve sonuçlarımızı sunmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Sutür destekli anterior scoring uyguladığımız olgularda antihelikal yapıya vasküler ve yapısal destek vermek için posterior yüz kıkırdağa yapışık dermis operasyonun ilk aşamasında korundu. Bu yöntemin uygulandığı 55 kepçe kulak olgusu retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bulgular: Dört olguda tek taraflı, diğerlerinde çift taraflı sorun mevcuttu. Operasyon sonrası beş olguda (%9,09) üst polde rekürrens (dışa açılma), bir olguda asimetrik görünümün devam etmesi (tüm asimetrik olguların %12,5'i), bir olguda (%1,82) anterior yüzde deride açık yara ve granülasyon, iki olguda (%3,64) sınırlı yüzeysel deri nekrozu ve iki olguda (%3,64) hafif antihelikal kıkırdak düzensizliği saptandı. Diğer hastalarda memnuniyet verici iyileşme ve estetik sonuç elde edildi. Sonuç: Elde ettiğimiz bulgular, geçmiş araştırma sonuçları ile kıyaslanabilir olup anterior scoring tekniği sırasında posterior dermisin korunması antihelikal kıkırdağa çok önemli bir vasküler ve yapısal destek sağlamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ANLATICI, R., ÖZERDEM, Ö. R. (2017). Anterior Open Scoring Otoplasty with Posterior Dermochondral Flap. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 168–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/375877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Mustardé JC. The correction of prominent ears using mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg 1963
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968
  3. 42(3): 189-93. [CrossRef] 3. Converse JM, Wood-Smith D. Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Stenström SJ. A natural technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963
  5. 32(5): 509-18. [CrossRef] 5. Chongchet V. A method of antihelix reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1963
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Thomas SS, Fatah F. Closed anterior scoring for prominent ear correction revisited. Br J Plast Surg 2001
  7. 54(7): 581-7. [CrossRef] 7. Başat SO, Askeroğlu U, Aksan T, Alleyne B, Yazar M, Orman Ç, et al. new otoplasty approach: a laterally based postauricular dermal flap as an addition to mustarde and furnas to prevent suture extrusion and recurrence. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014
  8. 38(1): 83-9. [CrossRef] 8. Bulstrode NW, Huang S, Martin DL. Otoplasty by Percutaneous Anterior Scoring. Another twist to the story: a long-term study of 114 patients. Br J Plast Surg 2003
  9. 56(2): 145-9. [CrossRef] 9. Aygit AC. Molding the ears after anterior scoring and concha repositioning: a combined approach for protruding ear correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003
  10. 27(1): 77-81. [CrossRef] 10. Peker F, Celiköz B. Otoplasty: Anterior scoring and posterior rolling technique in adults. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002
  11. 26(4): 267-73. [CrossRef] 11. Erol OO. New modification in otoplasty: anterior approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001
  12. 107(1): 193-202. [CrossRef] 12. Yugueros P, Friedland JA. Otoplasty: the experience of 100 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001
  13. 108(4): 1045-51. [CrossRef] 13. Jeffery SL. Complications following correction of prominent ears: an audit review of 122 cases. Br J Plast Surg 1999
  14. 52(7): 588-90. [CrossRef] 14. Crikelair G, Cosman B. Another solution for the problem of the prominent ear. Ann Plast Surg 1964
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Daniel RK, Calvert JW. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004
  16. 113(7): 2156-71. [CrossRef]