Journals / Turkish Journal of Rheumatology(.)Archives of Rheumatology / 2010 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Lateral Epikondilitli Hastalarda Ultrason Tedavisinin Kısa Dönem Etkinliÿi: Randomize, Tek Kör Plasebo Kontrollü, Prospektif Çalışma

Short-Term Effectiveness of Ultrasound Treatment in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis: Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Prospective Study

Pages
50–55
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In this study, it was found that US treatment for lateral epicondylitis improved pain and activities of daily living and resulted in high patient satisfaction

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound treatment in patients with lateral epicondylitis and to compare with placebo ultrasound treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All of the patients were randomized to two groups as: ultrasound (US) group (n=30) and placebo US group (n=30).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In this study, it was found that US treatment for lateral epicondylitis improved pain and activities of daily living and resulted in high patient satisfaction
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound treatment in patients with lateral epicondylitis and to compare with placebo ultrasound treatment. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with lateral epicondylitis were included. All of the patients were randomized to two groups as: ultrasound (US) group (n=30) and placebo US group (n=30). Continuous US was applied to the patients in the US group whereas placebo US was applied to those in the placebo group for 5 minutes over three weeks (totally 15 sessions). All patients used a static splint at night for the three weeks. Patients were assessed before the treatment (baseline), at the end of the treatment (3rd week) and after 15 days follow-up (5th week). The following parameters were evaluated: pain with the visual analog scale (VAS), hand grip strength using a hand dynamometer, activities of daily living using the Turkish version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-T) questionnaire, and quality of life using the Short-Form (SF)-36 questionnaires. In addition, patient satisfaction was examined. Results: VAS at rest and during motion had significantly improved in both groups at the end of treatment (3rd week) and in the follow-up (5th week), while improvement in the VAS was observed only in the 3rd week in placebo group (p<0.01). Pain with motion was significantly decreased in the 3rd and 5th weeks in the US group while it was increased in the 5th week in the placebo group (p<0.01). Hand grip strength were improved in the 3rd and 5th weeks in both groups (p<0.008). There was no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). No difference between the two groups was found in terms of general DASH-T scores at the end of the treatment and follow-up. However, improvement in DASH scores in the US group at the 3rd and 5th weeks was significantly higher than in the placebo group (p<0.017). Patient satisfaction scores increased in both groups, but satisfaction of patients in the US group was significantly higher than of those in the placebo group (p<0.001). Conclusion: In this study, it was found that US treatment for lateral epicondylitis improved pain and activities of daily living and resulted in high patient satisfaction

Özet

Amaç: Lateral epikondilit tanısı almış hastalarda ultrason tedavisinin etkinliğini araştırmak ve plasebo ultrason tedavisi ile karşılaştırmaktı.Yöntem ve Gereçler: Çalışmaya, lateral epikondilit tanısı konan 25-62 yaş (ort. yaş 46.7±8.1) arasında 60 hasta (40 kadın ve 20 erkek) dahil edildi. Hastalar randomize olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı: ultrason (US) grubu ve plasebo grubu. Ultrason grubundaki hastalara (n=30) sürekli ultrason; plasebo grubuna (n=30) ise çalışmayan başlığın kullanıldığı ultrason 5 dakika süreyle 3 hafta boyunca toplam 15 seans uygulandı. Tüm hastalara tedavi süresince (3 hafta) gece splinti verildi. Hastalar tedavi başlangıcı, sonu (3. hafta) ve 15 gün sonra (5. hafta ) değerlendirildi. İstirahat ve hareket ağrısı vizüel ağrı skalası (VAS) ile, el sıkma gücü el dinamometresi ile, günlük yaşam aktivite değerlendirmesi Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH-T) anketi Türkçe versiyonu ile, yaşam kalitesi Short-Form (SF)-36 ölçeği ile değerlendirildi Ayrıca hasta memnuniyeti de sorgulandı. Bulgular: İstirahat ağrısı (VAS); US grubunda hem tedavi sonunda (3. hafta) hem de 15 gün sonraki takipte (5. hafta) tedavi öncesine göre anlamlı düzelmişti, ancak plasebo grubundaki düzelme sadece 3. haftada gözlendi (p 0.05). DASH-T skorları açısından iki grup arasında tedavi sonunda ve 15 gün sonraki takipte fark yoktu. Tedavi öncesine göre 3. ve 5. haftalardaki DASH-T'taki değişim, US grubunda plasebo grubuna kıyasla anlamlı yüksekti (p<0.017). Hasta memnuniyeti her iki grupta da tedavi ile artmıştı, ancak US grubunda plasebo grubuna göre anlamlı oranda daha yüksekti (p<0.001). Sonuç: Bu çalışmada, ultrason tedavisinin, lateral epikondilitli hastalarda ağrı, günlük yaşam aktiviteleri ve hasta memnuniyetinde anlamlı düzelme sağladığı gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, C., ÖKEN, Ö., KÖSEOĞLU, F. B. (2010). Lateral Epikondilitli Hastalarda Ultrason Tedavisinin Kısa Dönem Etkinliÿi: Randomize, Tek Kör Plasebo Kontrollü, Prospektif Çalışma. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology(.)Archives of Rheumatology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 50–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/375557

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Finnoff JT. Musculoskeletal problems of the upper limb. In: Braddom RL (ed). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation WB Saunders Co. Philadelphia 2007: 825-53
  2. Klaiman M, Fink K. Connective tissue injuries of upper limb. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM (eds): Rehabilitation Mdicine Principles and Practice. J.B.Lipincott Co. Philadelphia 2007: 829-41
  3. Ernst E. Conservative therapy for tennis elbow. Br J Clin Pract. 1992; 46: 55-7
  4. Struijs PAA, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Assendelft WJJ, Van Dijk CN. Conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Brace versus physical therapy or a combination of both - a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 462-9
  5. Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon G, Cooper C. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 5: 642-51
  6. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validations of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic pain and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45-56
  7. Ertekin C. Ağrının nöroanatomi ve nörofizyolojisi. In: Yegül I (ed). Ağrı ve Tedavisi. İstanbul: Yapım Matbaacılık, 1993: 1-17
  8. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 222-6
  9. Dundar P, Fidaner C, Fidaner H, et al. Comparing the Turkish versions of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36, convergent validity of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36. Hippokratia 2002; 6: 27-43
  10. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Indust Med 1996; 29: 602-8
  11. Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç. The reliability and validity of Turkish version of DASH Questionnaire. Physiother Rehabil 2006; 17: 99-107
  12. Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 411-22
  13. Tan PK, Lam KS, Tan SK. Results of modified Basworth's operation for persistent and recurrent tennis elbow. Singapore Med J. 1989; 30: 359-62
  14. Özcan E. Lateral epikondilitte değerlendirme ve tedavi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 1990; 24: 74-6
  15. Moore G. Arthrocentesis technique and intraarticular therapy. In: Kopman W, Moreland L(eds). Arthritis and Allied Conditions. Lippincott WW. Philadelphia 2004: 775-86
  16. Kivi P. The etiology and conservative treatment of humeral epicondylitis. Scand J. Rehab