Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2019 / Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 4

Does kinesiotaping affect standing balance in healthy individuals? A pilot, double-blind, randomized-controlled study

Pages
327–334
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anteroposterior, mediolateral, and overallstability indexes (APSI, MLSI, and OSI, respectively) were measured and given in relative treatment effect (RTE).Results: There was no statistically significant interaction between the intervention and time for all stability indexes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the immediate and short-term effects of kinesiotaping (KT) on balance, when applied to the anklesof healthy individuals.Patients and methods: In this pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, a total of 24 healthy male individuals(mean age 31.8 years; range, 22 to 40 years) were randomized into two groups as KT and sham between January 2014 to March 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The control group had a prespecified sham application.Balance testing was done before, immediately after and 24 hours after the application of KT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anteroposterior, mediolateral, and overallstability indexes (APSI, MLSI, and OSI, respectively) were measured and given in relative treatment effect (RTE).Results: There was no statistically significant interaction between the intervention and time for all stability indexes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the immediate and short-term effects of kinesiotaping (KT) on balance, when applied to the anklesof healthy individuals.Patients and methods: In this pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, a total of 24 healthy male individuals(mean age 31.8 years; range, 22 to 40 years) were randomized into two groups as KT and sham between January 2014 to March 2014. TheKT group had a therapeutic KT application which could provide the ankle stability. The control group had a prespecified sham application.Balance testing was done before, immediately after and 24 hours after the application of KT. Anteroposterior, mediolateral, and overallstability indexes (APSI, MLSI, and OSI, respectively) were measured and given in relative treatment effect (RTE).Results: There was no statistically significant interaction between the intervention and time for all stability indexes. The main effects wereevaluated. The main effect of time showed a significant difference in terms of RTE and mean ranks at all time points for the MLSI and OSI(p=0.034 and p=0.009, respectively). The KT of ankle had an immediate positive effect on standing balance of healthy individuals which didnot sustain after 24 hours. The main effect of group showed that there was a significant difference in the RTE levels between the interventiongroups for all indexes. Based on the rank means, the KT group had a better stability than the sham group for all indexes.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that KT of ankle has an immediate positive effect on standing balance of healthy individuals byincreasing mediolateral stability of the ankle.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, H., ATAR, M. Ö., ATEŞ, C., TUR, B. S. (2019). Does kinesiotaping affect standing balance in healthy individuals? A pilot, double-blind, randomized-controlled study. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 4, 327–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/375257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kase K, Tatsuyuki H, Tomoki O. Development of Kinesio™ tape Kinesio™ Taping Perfect Manual. Kinesio Taping Association 1996;6-10:117-8
  2. Fu TC, Wong AM, Pei YC, Wu KP, Chou SW, Lin YC. Effect of Kinesio taping on muscle strength in athletes-a pilot study. J Sci Med Sport 2008;11:198-201
  3. Thelen MD, Dauber JA, Stoneman PD. The clinical efficacy of kinesio tape for shoulder pain: a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008;38:389-95
  4. Lin JJ, Hung CJ, Yang PL. The effects of scapular taping on electromyographic muscle activity and proprioception feedback in healthy shoulders. J Orthop Res 2011;29:53-7
  5. Raymond J, Nicholson LL, Hiller CE, Refshauge KM. The effect of ankle taping or bracing on proprioception in functional ankle instability: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Sci Med Sport 2012;15:386-92
  6. Murray H, Husk L. Effect of kinesio taping on proprioception in the ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001;31:A37
  7. Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M-, Vaughn R, Lien J. The effects of kinesio™ taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med 2004;3:1-7
  8. Çeliker R GZ, Aydog T, Bagis S, Atalay A, Yagci HC, Korkmaz N. The kinesiologic taping technique and its applications. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2011;57:225-35
  9. Cortesi M, Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J. Effect of kinesio taping on standing balance in subjects with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study\m{1}. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:365-72
  10. Nakajima MA, Baldridge C. The effect of kinesio® tape on vertical jump and dynamic postural control. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013;8:393-406
  11. Shields CA, Needle AR, Rose WC, Swanik CB, Kaminski TW. Effect of elastic taping on postural control deficits in subjects with healthy ankles, copers, and individuals with functional ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34:1427-35
  12. Nunes GS, de Noronha M, Cunha HS, Ruschel C, Borges NG Jr. Effect of kinesio taping on jumping and balance in athletes: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27:3183-9
  13. Kim BJ, Lee JH, Kim CT, Lee SM. Effects of ankle balance taping with kinesiology tape for a patient with chronic ankle instability. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:2405-6
  14. Bicici S, Karatas N, Baltaci G. Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012;7:154-66
  15. Wilson V, Douris P, Fukuroku T, Kuzniewski M, Dias J, F