Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2020 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 4

Factors affecting activities of daily living, physical balance, and prosthesis adjustment in non-traumatic lower limb amputees

Pages
405–412
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists should conduct a multidisciplinary evaluation, particularly in patients aged over 65 years and in transfemoral amputees to improve outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to identify the factors affecting the activities of daily living, balance, and prosthesis satisfaction in patients with non-traumatic lower limb amputation (LLA).Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 195 patients (120 males, 75 females; mean age 65.9±11.6 years; range, 40 to 90 years) who underwent LLA between January 2009 and April 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Prosthesis adjustment, physical balance ability, and daily living activities were assessed using the Turkish versions of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (NEADLS), respectively.results: There was no significant difference between male and female patients in terms of prosthesis and amputation adaptation, physical balance, and activities of daily living.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists should conduct a multidisciplinary evaluation, particularly in patients aged over 65 years and in transfemoral amputees to improve outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to identify the factors affecting the activities of daily living, balance, and prosthesis satisfaction in patients with non-traumatic lower limb amputation (LLA).Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 195 patients (120 males, 75 females; mean age 65.9±11.6 years; range, 40 to 90 years) who underwent LLA between January 2009 and April 2017. All patients were evaluated in terms of age, sex, amputation etiology, side, level, comorbidity, length of hospital stay, prosthesis adjustment, ambulation level, functional outcome, and complications. Prosthesis adjustment, physical balance ability, and daily living activities were assessed using the Turkish versions of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (NEADLS), respectively.results: There was no significant difference between male and female patients in terms of prosthesis and amputation adaptation, physical balance, and activities of daily living. The BBS, TAPES, and NEADLS scores were lower in the patients aged over 65 years (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). Prosthesis and amputation adaptation, physical balance, and daily living activities were also worse in this age group. Transfemoral amputees had lower BBS, TAPES, and NEADLS scores than the transtibial amputees (p=0.009, p=0.020, and p=0.004, respectively). Prosthesis and amputation adaptation, physical balance, and daily living activities were worse in the transfemoral amputees.conclusion: Age and amputation level affect physical balance, prosthesis satisfaction, and daily living activities after non-traumatic LLA. Therefore, orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists should conduct a multidisciplinary evaluation, particularly in patients aged over 65 years and in transfemoral amputees to improve outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAALİ, E., ÇİLOĞLU, O., DURAMAZ, A., YALIN, M., ATAY, M., ASLANTAŞ, F. Ç. (2020). Factors affecting activities of daily living, physical balance, and prosthesis adjustment in non-traumatic lower limb amputees. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 4, 405–412. https://ajindex.com/articles/375246

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Penn-Barwell JG. Outcomes in lower limb amputation following trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 2011;42:1474-9
  2. Iezzoni LI, Ronan LJ. Disability legacy of the Haitian earthquake. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:812-4
  3. Sinha R, Van Den Heuvel WJ. A systematic literature review of quality of life in lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:883-99
  4. Sinha R, van den Heuvel WJ, Arokiasamy P. Factors affecting quality of life in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011;35:90-6
  5. Dajpratham P, Tantiniramai S, Lukkapichonchut P, Kaewnaree S. Factors associated with vocational reintegration among the Thai lower limb amputees. J Med Assoc Thai 2008;91:234-9
  6. Knežević A, Salamon T, Milankov M, Ninković S, Jeremić Knežević M, et al. Assessment of quality of life in patients after lower limb amputation. Med Pregl 2015;68:103-8
  7. Akyol Y, Tander B, Goktepe AS, Safaz I, Kuru O, Tan AK. Quality of life in patients with lower limb amputation: Does it affect post-amputation pain, functional status, emotional status and perception of body image? Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 2013;21:334-40
  8. Topuz S, Ülger Ö, Yakut Y, Gül Şener F. Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scales (TAPES) in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011;35:201-6. 9. van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CA, Polomski W, Slootman JR, van der Woude LH, Houdijk H. Physical capacity and walking ability after lower limb amputation: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:999-1016
  9. Sansam K, O’Connor RJ, Neumann V, Bhakta B. Can simple clinical tests predict walking ability after prosthetic rehabilitation? J Rehabil Med 2012;44:968-74
  10. Wong CK, Young RS, Ow-Wing C, Karimi P. Determining 1-Yr prosthetic use for mobility prognoses for communitydwelling adults with lower-limb amputation: Development of a clinical prediction rule. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016;95:339-47
  11. Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, Kotevolu N, Sahin T, Kuran B. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Berg Balance Scale. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2008;31:32-7
  12. Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). Rehabilitation Psychology 2000;45:130-54
  13. Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, Kotevoglu N, Sahin T, Kuran B. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Aging Cli