SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2018 / Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 3

Spinal cord stimulation may improve not only intractable pain but also necrotic wounds

Atilla YILMAZ
Mustafa Turgut YILDIZGÖREN
İSMET MURAT MELEK
ORHAN VELİ DOĞAN
Pages
288–290
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Herein, we report a 59-year-old femalepatient with persistent neuropathic pain and peripheral arterial disease in the lower limb which was treated successfully with SCS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), an implantable neuromodulation modality, is one of the most exciting developments in chronic painsyndromes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, SCS may improve intractable pain and may help ischemic wound healing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Herein, we report a 59-year-old femalepatient with persistent neuropathic pain and peripheral arterial disease in the lower limb which was treated successfully with SCS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), an implantable neuromodulation modality, is one of the most exciting developments in chronic painsyndromes. In addition, SCS may improve intractable pain and may help ischemic wound healing. Herein, we report a 59-year-old femalepatient with persistent neuropathic pain and peripheral arterial disease in the lower limb which was treated successfully with SCS.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A., YILDIZGÖREN, M. T., MELEK, İ. M., DOĞAN, O. V. (2018). Spinal cord stimulation may improve not only intractable pain but also necrotic wounds. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 3, 288–290. https://ajindex.com/articles/375228

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965;150:971-9.
  2. Foreman RD, Linderoth B. Neural mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation. Int Rev Neurobiol 2012;107:87-119.
  3. Linderoth B, Meyerson B. Spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms of action. In: Burchiel K, editor. Surgical Management of Pain. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme Verlag; 2014. p. 319-33. Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004;100:254-67.
  4. Özdemir İ, Akbaş M1, Yeğin A, Dağıstan G, Erkan DÖ. Spinal cord stimulation in 62 patients: Retrospective evaluation. [Article in Turkish] Agri 2017;29:25-32.
  5. Zhu J, Gutman G, Collins JG, Colonna J. A review of surgical techniques in spinal cord stimulator implantation to decrease the post-operative infection rate. J Spine 2014;4:202. Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation 2014;17:515-50.
  6. De Caridi G, Massara M, David A, Giardina M, La Spada M, Stilo F, et al. Spinal cord stimulation to achieve wound healing in a primary lower limb critical ischaemia referral centre. Int Wound J 2016;13:220-5.
  7. De Caridi G, Massara M, Benedetto F, Tripodi P, Spinelli F, David A, et al. Adjuvant spinal cord stimulation improves wound healing of peripheral tissue loss due to steal syndrome of the hand: clinical challenge treating a difficult case. Int Wound J 2016;13:72-6.