AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightThe FFI scores were also higher in the prolotherapy group than the controls at 42 and 90days of treatment; however, both groups had similar scores at 360 days.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that prolotherapy is an effective auxiliary method for treating chronic plantar fasciitis.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of prolotherapy injections for the treatment of plantar fasciitis.Material and methods: Between October 2014 and October 2015, 60 patients with symptomatic chronic plantar fasciitis were randomlydivided into two groups, as control (n=31) and prolotherapy (n=29) groups. In the prolotherapy group, ultrasound-guided prolotherapyinjections into the plantar fascia up to five different points were performed three times every 21 days. In the control group, the patientsreceived instructions for plantar fascia and Achilles tendon stretching exercises three times a week for three months. Additionally, all patientswere given heel lifts and instructed to refrain from heavy loading activity. The patients were evaluated via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS),Food and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Foot Function Index (FFI) at baseline and at 21, 42, 90, and 360 days during follow-up.Results: A total of 50 patients completed follow-up (26 patients in the prolotherapy group and 24 patients in the control group). The VAS,FAOS, and FFI scores were significantly improved in both groups (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the painand functional scores at 21 days of treatment between the groups. The VAS and FAOS scores were higher in the prolotherapy group than thecontrol group at 42, 90, and 360 days of treatment. The FFI scores were also higher in the prolotherapy group than the controls at 42 and 90days of treatment; however, both groups had similar scores at 360 days.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that prolotherapy is an effective auxiliary method for treating chronic plantar fasciitis.