Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2018 / Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 3

Demographic and clinical features and rehabilitation outcomes of patients with Friedreich ataxia: A retrospective study

Pages
230–238
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the rehabilitation program, all patients were discharged with functionally improved levels based onthe FAC, Hoffer Ambulation Scale (p<0.05), and Barthel Index (p<0.001), indicating a statistically significant difference.Conclusion: An appropriate and comprehensive rehabilitation program improves the ambulation level and independence level of dailyactivities in patients with Friedreich ataxia, which highlights the importance of rehabilitation in these patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the demographic and clinical features, and rehabilitation outcomes of Friedreich Ataxia patientsin the inpatient setting.Patients and methods: Between January 2000 and December 2012, a total of 37 Friedreich Ataxia patients (26 males, 11 females; mean age29.2±9.6 years; range, 16 to 53 years) were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Barthel Indexscores were used to assess daily living activities of the patients before and after the treatment.Results: The mean rehabilitation duration was 4.7±1.4 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the rehabilitation program, all patients were discharged with functionally improved levels based onthe FAC, Hoffer Ambulation Scale (p<0.05), and Barthel Index (p<0.001), indicating a statistically significant difference.Conclusion: An appropriate and comprehensive rehabilitation program improves the ambulation level and independence level of dailyactivities in patients with Friedreich ataxia, which highlights the importance of rehabilitation in these patients.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the demographic and clinical features, and rehabilitation outcomes of Friedreich Ataxia patientsin the inpatient setting.Patients and methods: Between January 2000 and December 2012, a total of 37 Friedreich Ataxia patients (26 males, 11 females; mean age29.2±9.6 years; range, 16 to 53 years) were included in the study. Demographic and clinical features of the patients and rehabilitation outcomeswere reviewed retrospectively. Duration of rehabilitation, age at onset of disease, first onset of extremity, were determined. The FunctionalAmbulation Category (FAC) and Hoffer Ambulation Scale levels were used to assess the ambulation levels of patients. The Barthel Indexscores were used to assess daily living activities of the patients before and after the treatment.Results: The mean rehabilitation duration was 4.7±1.4 weeks. There was cardiac involvement in nine (24.3%) patients and obstructive/restrictive pulmonary disease in five patients (13.5%). A total of 33 patients (89.2%) had severe ataxia, four (10.8%) had mild ataxia, 33 (89%)had dysarthria, 18 (48.6%) had scoliosis, 16 (43.2%) had kyphose, 15 (40.5%) had pes cavus, five (13%) had optic atrophy, and two (6%) hadnystagmus of all patients. At the end of the rehabilitation program, all patients were discharged with functionally improved levels based onthe FAC, Hoffer Ambulation Scale (p<0.05), and Barthel Index (p<0.001), indicating a statistically significant difference.Conclusion: An appropriate and comprehensive rehabilitation program improves the ambulation level and independence level of dailyactivities in patients with Friedreich ataxia, which highlights the importance of rehabilitation in these patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, M. D., ŞEN, S. B., YÜZER, G. F. N., ÖZGİRGİN, N. (2018). Demographic and clinical features and rehabilitation outcomes of patients with Friedreich ataxia: A retrospective study. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 3, 230–238. https://ajindex.com/articles/375210

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Brice A. Friedreich ataxia. Orphanet Encyclopedia. October 2004. Available from: http://www.orpha.net/data/patho/ GB/uk-friedreich.pdf Maring JR, Croarkin E. Presentation and progression of Friedreich ataxia and implications for physical therapist examination. Phys Ther 2007;87:1687-96.
  2. Schulz JB, Boesch S, Bürk K, Dürr A, Giunti P, Mariotti C, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Friedreich ataxia: a European perspective. Nat Rev Neurol 2009;5:222-34. Pandolfo M. Friedreich ataxia: the clinical picture. J Neurol 2009;256:3-8.
  3. Maurel N, Diop A, Gouelle A, Alberti C, Husson I. Assessment of upper limb function in young Friedreich ataxia patients compared to control subjects using a new three-dimensional kinematic protocol. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2013;28:386-94.
  4. Dulgeroglu D, Kurtaran A, Erkin G, Kaya K, Aybay C. General properties of patients with friedreich's ataxia and rehabilitation outcomes: A retrospective study. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2003;49:27-31.
  5. Gündüz A, Apaydın H. Progressive ataxias: Clinical features and differentiel diagnosis. J Parkinson Dis Mov Disord 2007;10:72. Gilroy J. Basic Neurology: Degenerative diseases. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2000.
  6. Dombovy ML, Pippin BA. Rehabilitation concerns in degenerative movement disorders the central nevous system: In: Braddom RL, Buschbacher RM, editors. Phys Med and Rehab. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1996. p. 1164-76. Harding AE. Friedreich's ataxia: a clinical and genetic study of 90 families with an analysis of early diagnostic criteria and intrafamilial clustering of clinical features. Brain 1981;104:589-620.
  7. Santos R, Lefevre S, Sliwa D, Seguin A, Camadro JM, Lesuisse E. Friedreich ataxia: molecular mechanisms, redox considerations, and therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal 2010;13:651-90.
  8. Croarkin E, Maring J, Pfalzer L, Harris-Love M, Siegel K, DiProspero N. Characterizing gait, locomotor status, and disease severity in children and adolescents with Friedreich ataxia. J Neurol Phys Ther 2009;33:144-9.
  9. Barthel Mahoney FL, Barthel DW. Functional Evaluation: Barthel Index. MD State Med J 1965;14:61-5.
  10. Granger CV, Kelly-Heyes M, Johnston M, Deutch A, Braun S, Fiedler RC. Quality and outcome measures for medical rehabilitations. In: Braddom RL, Buschbacher RM, editors. Phys Med and Rehab. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1996. p. 151-64.
  11. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation categ