Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2018 / Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 4

Recurrence rate after pressure ulcer reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury in patients under control by a plastic surgery and physical medicine and rehabilitation team

Pages
322–327
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No statistically significant effect of clinical anddemographic risk factors was found on the risk of recurrence of PU.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that collaboration between plastic surgery and physical medicine and rehabilitation department witha strict follow-up protocol may help to prevent recurrences of PU after surgery in SCI patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the recurrence rate after reconstruction of the pressure ulcer (PU) in patients with spinal cord injury(SCI) treated by a team consisted of plastic surgery and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists.Patients and methods: Between February 2002 and December 2008, a total of 39 patients with SCI (32 males, 7 females; mean age38.1±6.7 years; range, 19 to 71 years) aged ≥18 years who were admitted to our rehabilitation unit and operated for PU were retrospectivelyanalyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patientswere followed for the PU recurrence after reconstruction.Results: The recurrence of PU was observed in nine patients (23.1%) with SCI.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No statistically significant effect of clinical anddemographic risk factors was found on the risk of recurrence of PU.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that collaboration between plastic surgery and physical medicine and rehabilitation department witha strict follow-up protocol may help to prevent recurrences of PU after surgery in SCI patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the recurrence rate after reconstruction of the pressure ulcer (PU) in patients with spinal cord injury(SCI) treated by a team consisted of plastic surgery and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists.Patients and methods: Between February 2002 and December 2008, a total of 39 patients with SCI (32 males, 7 females; mean age38.1±6.7 years; range, 19 to 71 years) aged ≥18 years who were admitted to our rehabilitation unit and operated for PU were retrospectivelyanalyzed. Demographic data and physical examination findings and potential risk factors for recurrence of PU were recorded. All patientswere followed for the PU recurrence after reconstruction.Results: The recurrence of PU was observed in nine patients (23.1%) with SCI. The most common recurrent PU was sacral ulcer (82.1%),followed by ischial ulcers (20.5%), trochanteric ulcers (15.4%), and others (2.6%). No risk factor was found to be statistically significantbetween the two groups in terms of both demographic risk factors and clinical risk factors. No statistically significant effect of clinical anddemographic risk factors was found on the risk of recurrence of PU.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that collaboration between plastic surgery and physical medicine and rehabilitation department witha strict follow-up protocol may help to prevent recurrences of PU after surgery in SCI patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAKER, N., BUĞDAYCI, D., GÖKŞENOĞLU, G., AKBAŞ, D., KORKUT, T. (2018). Recurrence rate after pressure ulcer reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury in patients under control by a plastic surgery and physical medicine and rehabilitation team. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 4, 322–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/375201

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Kruger EA, Pires M, Ngann Y, Sterling M, Rubayi S. Comprehensive management of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury: current concepts and future trends. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36:572-85. Gélis A, Dupeyron A, Legros P, Benaïm C, Pelissier J, Fattal C. Pressure ulcer risk factors in persons with spinal cord injury part 2: the chronic stage. Spinal Cord 2009;47:651-61.
  2. Byrne DW, Salzberg CA. Major risk factors for pressure ulcers in the spinal cord disabled: a literature review. Spinal Cord 1996;34:255-63. Krause JS. Skin sores after spinal cord injury: relationship to life adjustment. Spinal Cord 1998;36:51-6.
  3. Bardak AN, Erhan B, Gündüz B, Seyyah Ö, Boriçi S. Prevalance and risk factors of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injured patients. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2010;56:26-9.
  4. Verschueren JH, Post MW, de Groot S, van der Woude LH, van Asbeck FW, Rol M. Occurrence and predictors of pressure ulcers during primary in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 2011;49:106-12.
  5. Kovindha A, Kammuang-Lue P, Prakongsai P, Wongphan T. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Thai wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 2015;53:767-71. Sørensen JL, Jørgensen B, Gottrup F. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcers. Am J Surg 2004;188:42-51. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. In: Haesler E, editör. Osborne Park: Cambridge Media; 2014.
  6. Yamamoto Y, Tsutsumida A, Murazumi M, Sugihara T. Long-term outcome of pressure sores treated with flap coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:1212-7.
  7. Sameem M, Au M, Wood T, Farrokhyar F, Mahoney J. A systematic review of complication and recurrence rates of musculocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, and perforator-based flaps for treatment of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:67-77.
  8. Kuo PJ, Chew KY, Kuo YR, Lin PY. Comparison of outcomes of pressure sore reconstructions among perforator f laps, perforator-based rotation fasciocutaneous f laps, and musculocutaneous f laps. Microsurgery 2014;34:547-53.
  9. Sapountzis S, Park HJ, Kim JH, Chantes A, Beak RM, Heo CY. The ‘reading man flap’ for pressure sore reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:448-52.
  10. Tavakoli K, Rutkowski S, Cope C, Hassall M, Barnett R, Richards M, et al. Recurrence rates of ischial sores in paraand tetraplegics treated with hamstring flaps: an 8-year study. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:476-9. Relander