SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2020 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of mobilization with supervised exercise for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome

Ferit PEKGÖZ
Hanifegül TAŞKIRAN
EBRU KAYA MUTLU
Ayçe ATALAR
Reyhan ÇELİKLER
Pages
184–192
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patient satisfaction with treatment was similar in both groups (p=0.28).Conclusion: Based on our study results, mobilization and supervised exercise yield comparable outcomes in patients with SAIS

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of joint mobilization with supervised exercise in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS).Patients and methods: This prospective, randomized-controlled study included a total of 40 patients (18 males, 22 females; mean age 43.52 years; range, 27 to 67 years) with SAIS of more than six weeks between June 2014 and June 2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (n=20) received joint mobilization and neuromuscular electrical stimulation and Group 2 (n=20) received a supervised exercise program and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patient satisfaction with treatment was similar in both groups (p=0.28).Conclusion: Based on our study results, mobilization and supervised exercise yield comparable outcomes in patients with SAIS
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of joint mobilization with supervised exercise in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS).Patients and methods: This prospective, randomized-controlled study included a total of 40 patients (18 males, 22 females; mean age 43.52 years; range, 27 to 67 years) with SAIS of more than six weeks between June 2014 and June 2015. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (n=20) received joint mobilization and neuromuscular electrical stimulation and Group 2 (n=20) received a supervised exercise program and neuromuscular electrical stimulation. The outcome measures included the range of motion, pain intensity, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form-patient self-report section, Short Form-36, and Global Rating of Change Questionnaire. Pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS).Results: In both groups, the mean VAS scores significantly decreased and the range of motion significantly increased after treatment (p 0.05). Patient satisfaction with treatment was similar in both groups (p=0.28).Conclusion: Based on our study results, mobilization and supervised exercise yield comparable outcomes in patients with SAIS

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKGÖZ, F., TAŞKIRAN, H., MUTLU, E. K., ATALAR, A., ÇELİKLER, R. (2020). Comparison of mobilization with supervised exercise for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 2, 184–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/375137

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Steuri R, Sattelmayer M, Elsig S, Kolly C, Tal A, Taeymans J, et al. Effectiveness of conservative interventions including exercise, manual therapy and medical management in adults with shoulder impingement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:1340-7
  2. Kuhn JE. Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:138-60
  3. Hawk C, Minkalis AL, Khorsan R, Daniels CJ, Homack D, Gliedt JA, et al. Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017;40:293-319
  4. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Doukas WC, Murphy KP. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1898-903
  5. Institute for Work and Health. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure. Available at: http:// www.dash.iwh.on.ca/. [Accessed: December 25, 2018]
  6. Dutton M. Orthopedic examination, evaluation and intervention. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004
  7. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14:128-46
  8. Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, Yörükan S, Semin Bilgütay B, Ayhan Ç, et al. Kol,Omuz ve El sorunları (Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder and Hand - DASH) Anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 2006;17:99-107
  9. Tate AR, McClure PW, Young IA, Salvatori R, Michener LA. Comprehensive impairment-based exercise and manual therapy intervention for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:474-93
  10. Michener LA, Snyder Valier AR, McClure PW. Defining substantial clinical benefit for patient-rated outcome tools for shoulder impingement syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:725-30
  11. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:587-94
  12. Celik D, Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Dirican A. Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish ASES questionnaire. Knee Surg