SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2020 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 3

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (TR-SF-MPQ-2) in patients with chronic low back pain

Sanem Aslıhan AYKAN
Halil UÇAN
Pages
343–350
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The correlation coefficient between the mean VAS and the mean total score was 0.648.Conclusion: Our study results indicate that the Turkish version of the SF-MPQ-2 is a reliable and valid tool to assess pain in the Turkish patients with CLBP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the expanded and revised version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (TR-SF-MPQ-2) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and to investigate the relationship between TR-SF-MPQ-2 and etiology, pain scales, and disability index.Patients and methods: Between October 2014 and December 2014, a total of 194 patients with CLBP (66 males, 128 females; mean age 50±14.3 years; range, 35 to 65 years) attending to our outpatient clinic were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index were also used to test concurrent validity of the questionnaire.Results: For total score, Cronbach α was 0.912 and ICC was 0.973, ranging from 0.72 to 0.84 for Cronbach α and from 0.960 to 0.989 for ICC in subgroups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The correlation coefficient between the mean VAS and the mean total score was 0.648.Conclusion: Our study results indicate that the Turkish version of the SF-MPQ-2 is a reliable and valid tool to assess pain in the Turkish patients with CLBP.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the expanded and revised version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (TR-SF-MPQ-2) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and to investigate the relationship between TR-SF-MPQ-2 and etiology, pain scales, and disability index.Patients and methods: Between October 2014 and December 2014, a total of 194 patients with CLBP (66 males, 128 females; mean age 50±14.3 years; range, 35 to 65 years) attending to our outpatient clinic were included. To assess reliability, Cronbach alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were estimated for participants who completed the questionnaire in the morning and afternoon. The validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by analyzing the confirmatory factor analysis. The Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index were also used to test concurrent validity of the questionnaire.Results: For total score, Cronbach α was 0.912 and ICC was 0.973, ranging from 0.72 to 0.84 for Cronbach α and from 0.960 to 0.989 for ICC in subgroups. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit for each subgroup (c2/Df 0.95, CFI >0.90, NFI >0.90, and RMSEA <0.10). The correlation coefficient between the mean VAS and the mean total score was 0.648.Conclusion: Our study results indicate that the Turkish version of the SF-MPQ-2 is a reliable and valid tool to assess pain in the Turkish patients with CLBP.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYKAN, S. A., UÇAN, H. (2020). Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (TR-SF-MPQ-2) in patients with chronic low back pain. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 3, 343–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/375106

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Patrick N, Emanski E, Knaub MA. Acute and chronic low back pain. Med Clin North Am 2014;98:777-89
  2. Chou R. In the clinic. Low back pain. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:ITC6-1
  3. Mehra M, Hill K, Nicholl D, Schadrack J. The burden of chronic low back pain with and without a neuropathic component: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis. J Med Econ 2012;15:245-52
  4. Arnold LM, Choy E, Clauw DJ, Goldenberg DL, Harris RE, Helfenstein M Jr, et al. Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain Syndromes: A White Paper Detailing Current Challenges in the Field. Clin J Pain 2016;32:737-46
  5. Cedraschi C, Nordin M, Haldeman S, Randhawa K, Kopansky-Giles D, Johnson CD, et al. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities. Eur Spine J 2018;27(Suppl 6):828-37
  6. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277-99
  7. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1987;30:191-7
  8. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, Harding G, Coyne KS, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain 2009;144:35-42
  9. Adelmanesh F, Jalali A, Attarian H, Farahani B, Ketabchi SM, Arvantaj A, et al. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity measures of expanded and revised version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) in Iranian patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. Pain Med 2012;13:1631-6
  10. Buppha P, Tontisirin N, Numthavaj P, Sakdanuwatwong S, Sodsee W, Finlayson RJ, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Thai Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2). J Anesth Clin Res 2016;7:651
  11. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Trudeau JJ, Benson C, Biondi DM, Katz NP, et al. Validation of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in acute low back pain. J Pain 2015;16:357-66
  12. Gauthier LR, Young A, Dworkin RH, Rodin G, Zimmermann C, Warr D, et al. Validation of the shortform McGill pain questionnaire-2 in younger and older people with cancer pain. J Pain 2014;15:756-70
  13. Kachooei AR, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Erfani-Sayyar R, Salehi M, Salimi E, Razi S. Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2): A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study of the Persian Version in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2015;3:45-50
  14. Maruo T, Nakae A, Maeda L, Shi K, Takahashi K, Morris S, et al. Validi