SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2015 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Mini-implant Usage in Orthodontic Practice

YASEMİN BAHAR ACAR
Civan Aved HERGEL
Mustafa ATEŞ
Nazan KÜÇÜKKELEŞ
Pages
1–6
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The orthodontists were asked to click on a link to complete an automated questionnaire of 27 multiple-choice questions.Results: It was found that mini-implants are used by a great majority of the participants and in various cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The present study was designed to investigate the general anchorage protocols and especially the tendencies duringmini-implant usage among Turkish orthodontists.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The orthodontists were asked to click on a link to complete an automated questionnaire of 27 multiple-choice questions.Results: It was found that mini-implants are used by a great majority of the participants and in various cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:General tendenciesduring mini-implant usage show compatibility with the literature.Conclusion: This survey displays the preferences of Turkish orthodontists regarding mini-implant usage in their clinical practice.Moreover, it is especially important for documenting the fact that mini-implants are being used more than once and also indifferent patients. (Turkish J Orthod 2015;28:1–6)
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The present study was designed to investigate the general anchorage protocols and especially the tendencies duringmini-implant usage among Turkish orthodontists. The main aim of the survey is to reveal if mini-implants are being used morethan once and in different patients.Materials and Method: This is a cross-sectional study conducted with orthodontists who are members of the Turkish OrthodonticSociety. The orthodontists were asked to click on a link to complete an automated questionnaire of 27 multiple-choice questions.Results: It was found that mini-implants are used by a great majority of the participants and in various cases. General tendenciesduring mini-implant usage show compatibility with the literature.Conclusion: This survey displays the preferences of Turkish orthodontists regarding mini-implant usage in their clinical practice.Moreover, it is especially important for documenting the fact that mini-implants are being used more than once and also indifferent patients. (Turkish J Orthod 2015;28:1–6)

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, Y. B., HERGEL, C. A., ATEŞ, M., KÜÇÜKKELEŞ, N. (2015). Mini-implant Usage in Orthodontic Practice. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/375089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:763–767
  2. Melsen B, Verna C. Miniscrew implants: the Aarhus anchorage system. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:24–31
  3. Herman R, Cope JB. Miniscrew implants: IMTEC mini ortho implants. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:32–39
  4. Crismani AG, Bernhart T, Bantleon HP, Cope JB. Palata implants: the Straumann Orthosystem. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11:16–23
  5. Maino BG, Mura P, Bednar J. Miniscrew implants: the spider screw anchorage system. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:40–46
  6. Maino BG, Maino G, Mura P. Spider screw: skeletal anchorage system. Prog Orthod. 2005;6:70–81
  7. Carano A, Velo S, Leone P, Siciliani G. Clinical applications of the miniscrew anchorage system. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39: 9–24
  8. Ohnishi H, Yagi T, Yasuda Y, Takada K. A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:444–452
  9. Park H, Bae S, Kyung H, Sung J. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35:417–428
  10. Park Y, Chu J, Choi Y, Choi N. Extraction space closure with vacuum-formed splints and miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:76–79
  11. Yun S, Lim W, Chun Y. Molar control using indirect miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:661–664
  12. Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Micro-implant anchorage for forced eruption of impacted canines. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38: 297–302
  13. Park H, Kyung H, Sung J. A simple method of molar uprighting with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:592–596
  14. Giancotti A, Muzzi F, Santini F, Arcuri C. Miniscrew treatment of ectopic mandibular molars. J Clin Orthod. 2004;37:380–383
  15. Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Uprighting second molars with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38:100– 103
  16. Park Y, Lee SY, Kim DH, Jee SH. Intrusion of posterior teeth using miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:690–694
  17. Paik C, Woo Y, Boyd R. Treatment of an adult patient with vertical maxillary excess using miniscrew fixation. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37:423–428
  18. Chang YJ, Lee HS, Chun YS. Microscrew anchorage for molar intrusion. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38:325–330
  19. Yao CC, Lee JJ, Chen HY, Chang ZC, Chang HF, Chen YJ. Maxillary molar intrusion with fixed appliances and miniimplant anchorage studied in three dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:754–760
  20. Bae SM, Kyung HM. Mandibular molar intrusion with miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2006;40:107–108
  21. Chung K, Kim S